Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
NCT ID: NCT07314554
Last Updated: 2026-01-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-20
2029-02-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
BACKGROUND: Gastric and intestinal polyps are common digestive diseases with potential for malignant transformation. Although endoscopic resection is the standard treatment, recurrence rates range from 10-50%, and the mechanisms and risk factors remain unclear.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary: To assess short-term (1-year) and long-term (3-year) recurrence rates after endoscopic polyp resection Secondary: To identify independent risk factors and develop a recurrence risk prediction model
DESIGN: Mixed retrospective-prospective cohort study
* Retrospective cohort: Patients who underwent polyp resection from 2021-2022, with follow-up data through 2024
* Prospective cohort: Patients enrolled from 2024-2025, with standardized follow-up through 2028
SETTING: Single tertiary referral center with \>10,000 endoscopic polyp resections performed since 2021
PARTICIPANTS: Approximately 1,600-1,800 adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent complete endoscopic resection of gastric or intestinal polyps
FOLLOW-UP:
* Short-term: 1 year post-resection (±2 months)
* Long-term: 3 years post-resection (±3 months)
MAIN OUTCOME: Recurrence rate defined as new polyp detection at original or different sites during endoscopic surveillance
POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS: Patient demographics, polyp characteristics (size, number, location, pathology), resection method, Helicobacter pylori status, lifestyle factors, and medication use
EXPECTED IMPACT: Results will inform personalized surveillance strategies and optimize resource allocation for post-polypectomy follow-up.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Web-Mediated Risk Assessment for Endoscopic Screening of Colorectal Polyps
NCT03750617
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598
The Real-time Optical Diagnosis Value of Optical Enhancement Endoscopy in Colorectal Sessile Serrated Adenomas/Polyps
NCT03238573
Six Versus Twelve Month Index Follow-up After Large Colon Polyp Resection
NCT07198945
Influencing Factors in Patients With Colorectal and Gastric Polyps a Retrospective Study
NCT04444947
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retrospective Cohort
Patients who underwent endoscopic polyp resection from January 2021 to December 2022, with retrospective data collection and follow-up through December 2025
No interventions assigned to this group
Prospective Cohort
Patients undergoing endoscopic polyp resection from October 2024 to December 2025, with prospective standardized data collection and follow-up through December 2028
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* First-time endoscopic examination (gastroscopy or colonoscopy) at the study center
* Pathologically confirmed polyp of any type (adenomatous, hyperplastic, inflammatory, fundic gland polyp, hamartomatous, serrated lesion)
* Complete endoscopic resection performed (including EMR, ESD, snare polypectomy, hot biopsy forceps, or argon plasma coagulation)
* Negative resection margins or complete resection assessed by pathology
* At least one follow-up endoscopic examination completed (for retrospective cohort) or willingness to complete follow-up (for prospective cohort)
* Complete baseline clinical data available
Exclusion Criteria
* Inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease)
* Previous history of gastric or colorectal cancer
* Cancer detected at initial resection (stage T1b or higher)
* Non-polyp pathology (e.g., submucosal tumors, normal mucosa)
* Incomplete resection with positive margins that were not re-treated
* Lost to follow-up with no available surveillance data (for retrospective cohort)
* Pregnancy at time of enrollment
* Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent (for prospective cohort)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
LanZhou University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhaofeng Chen
Clinical Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sekiguchi M, Kakugawa Y, Matsumoto M, Matsuda T. A scoring model for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia in a screened population of asymptomatic Japanese individuals. J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;53(10):1109-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1433-7. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, Knebel P, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2014 Mar;146(3):709-17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
Click B, Pinsky PF, Hickey T, Doroudi M, Schoen RE. Association of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence. JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):2021-2031. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5809.
Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Jiang R, Ahnen DJ, Bond JH, Church TR, Robertson DJ, Smith-Warner SA, Jacobs ET, Alberts DS, Greenberg ER. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):832-41. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.007. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LDYYczf2025121801
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.