Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT ID: NCT01646242
Last Updated: 2014-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598
Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps
NCT02239536
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT00763425
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cold snare polypectomy
removal of eligible polyps using cold snare polypectomy technique
Snare polypectomy using a mini (10 mm open diameter) size electrosurgical snare without application of electrocautery
Double biopsy polypectomy
removal of eligible polyps using double biopsy technique
Cold forceps polypectomy using a standard- capacity forceps with double biopsy technique (two bites per one forceps pass)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
removal of eligible polyps using cold snare polypectomy technique
Snare polypectomy using a mini (10 mm open diameter) size electrosurgical snare without application of electrocautery
removal of eligible polyps using double biopsy technique
Cold forceps polypectomy using a standard- capacity forceps with double biopsy technique (two bites per one forceps pass)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Known existing bleeding tendency (thrombocytopenia or prolonged INR)
* Inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis)
* ASA class III or more
* Pregnancy
* Any condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, places the patient at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kyunghee University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chang Kyun Lee
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chang Kyun Lee, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kyung Hee University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kyunghee University Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Apr;47(4):481-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0078-6. Epub 2004 Mar 4.
Draganov PV, Chang MN, Alkhasawneh A, Dixon LR, Lieb J, Moshiree B, Polyak S, Sultan S, Collins D, Suman A, Valentine JF, Wagh MS, Habashi SL, Forsmark CE. Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.019.
Efthymiou M, Taylor AC, Desmond PV, Allen PB, Chen RY. Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy. 2011 Apr;43(4):312-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256086. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CPP2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.