Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT ID: NCT00763425
Last Updated: 2015-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-30
2009-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is expected to be more effective than conventional polypectomy.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
cold polypectomy
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using cold snare polypectomy.
2
conventional polypectomy
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using conventional polypectomy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cold polypectomy
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using cold snare polypectomy.
conventional polypectomy
The removal of small colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is performed using conventional polypectomy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Overweight (body weight \> 100 kg)
* Allergic to the drugs used or its components (soybeans or eggs)
* Poor bowel preparation or post-colorectal surgery.
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Showa Inan General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Akira Horiuchi
Digestive Disease Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Showa Inan General hospital
Komagane, Nagano, Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
200888
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id