Randomised Comparison of 2 Cold Snare Polypectomy Techniques
NCT ID: NCT02208401
Last Updated: 2014-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
112 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT01646242
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT00763425
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650
Clinical Study to Compare Cold Snare Underwater Polypectomy to Cold Snare Conventional Polypectomy for Colon Polyps [COLDWATER Study]
NCT05273697
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
conventional cold snare polypectomy
conventional cold snare polypectomy
conventional cold snare polypectomy
conventional cold snare polypectomy
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
conventional cold snare polypectomy
conventional cold snare polypectomy
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant
* Inadequate bowel preparation
* On anticoagulants or clopidogrel
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shawinder Johal, MBChB, PhD, MRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Din S, Ball AJ, Riley SA, Kitsanta P, Johal S. A randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy versus a suction pseudopolyp technique. Endoscopy. 2015 Nov;47(11):1005-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392533. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STH17227
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.