Cold Snare Versus Cold Forceps Polypectomy for Small Lesions
NCT ID: NCT06970808
Last Updated: 2025-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
312 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-31
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the cold forceps guarantee a complete endoscopic resection rate?
* How many adverse events could the jumbo forceps reduce in comparison to CSP?
* Does the lesion retrieval rate increase?
* Does the polypectomy duration decrease? Participants will be randomized to one or to the other group when a polypoid or non-polypoid lesion is identified. If multiple polyps are found in the same patient, they will be removed using the same polypectomy technique.
If polypectomy cannot be performed using the indicated technique, a crossover will be done according to the best practice of care principles.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal
NCT04727918
Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Forceps for Obtaining Cold Biopsy Polypectomy for Small Sessile Colorectal Polyps Less Than 6 mm in Diameter
NCT00855790
Biopsy Forceps Versus Cold Snare for the Resection of Small Colonic Polyps
NCT02239549
Cold Snare Polypectomy
NCT03501849
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesize a less number of adverse events with CFP, an increased lesion retrieval rate and a less duration of the polypectomy procedure.
All patients will be contacted, 30 days post-polypectomy, by blinded medical staff assessing for possible complications.
All consecutive patients with polyp lesions can be enrolled, the participation is voluntary and randomization will be performed using the "minimization technique".
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cold snare polypectomy group
For CSP, a 10 mm cold snare will be used (cold snare, Boston Scientific Corporation®, Marlborough, Massachusetts and cold snare, Meditalia S.A.S.®, Palermo, Italy); for CFP, a dedicated forceps will be used (Leviathan® cold forceps, 10 mm opening; Meditalia S.A.S., Palermo, Italy)
Sampling from the resection margins
After polypectomy, the base will be irrigated and assessed by the endoscopist, who may also use virtual or vital chromoendoscopy, if needed.
Any residual adenomatous tissue will be removed using the same technique. To confirm the completeness of each polypectomy, two biopsies will be taken from the resection margins for polyps ≤ 5 mm, and three biopsies for polyps 6-9 mm, using standard biopsy forces.
Cold forceps polypectomy group
For CFP, Leviathan® will be used (Meditalia S.A.S., Palermo, Italy). The opening jaw reaches a 10 mm diameter, and the central section of each jaw has an enlarged diameter up to 3.6 mm compared to the oval axis, enhancing its capacity
Sampling from the resection margins
After polypectomy, the base will be irrigated and assessed by the endoscopist, who may also use virtual or vital chromoendoscopy, if needed.
Any residual adenomatous tissue will be removed using the same technique. To confirm the completeness of each polypectomy, two biopsies will be taken from the resection margins for polyps ≤ 5 mm, and three biopsies for polyps 6-9 mm, using standard biopsy forces.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sampling from the resection margins
After polypectomy, the base will be irrigated and assessed by the endoscopist, who may also use virtual or vital chromoendoscopy, if needed.
Any residual adenomatous tissue will be removed using the same technique. To confirm the completeness of each polypectomy, two biopsies will be taken from the resection margins for polyps ≤ 5 mm, and three biopsies for polyps 6-9 mm, using standard biopsy forces.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to provide informed consent;
* Presence of at least one colorectal polypoid/non-polypoid lesion \< 10 mm
Exclusion Criteria
* Improper interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy and/or antiplatelet therapy with P2Y12 receptor antagonists (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) and/or anticoagulant therapy;
* Chronic inflammatory bowel diseases;
* Inpatients undergoing colonoscopy;
* Colonoscopy as part of regional colorectal cancer screening;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda USL Modena
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Mauro Manno
Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mauro Manno
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AUSL Modena
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AUSL Modena
Carpi, Modena, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04-2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.