Polypectomy With Hot vs Cold Snare in Small Colonic Lesions
NCT ID: NCT03783156
Last Updated: 2020-05-13
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
300 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2019-02-18
Study Completion Date
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Colonoscopy is the technique of choice for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The identification and extirpation of adenomas decreases the incidence of CRC by up to 76%. More than 70% of the excised lesions are less than 10 mm. There is controversy about the technique to be used (resection with cold vs hot snare) in lesions of 5-9mm. Both use a polypectomy snare. The cold snare cuts by friction, while the hot snare uses electrical current. We propose a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing both endoscopic techniques. At least 394 injuries per group will be included, randomizing patients to whom a diagnostic colonoscopy is requested for symptoms, screening or revision protocols. Randomization will be performed stratified by center. The primary objective is the proportion of incomplete polypectomies, which will be analyzed centrally from random biopsies of the edges of the lesion. As secondary objectives, we will compare the proportion of immediate and delayed hemorrhagic complications, the evolution of postprocedural abdominal pain and the factors associated with incomplete excision in each group and the factors associated with a failed cold polypectomy. The analysis of the primary objective will be carried out by means of the z test of homogeneity without using the correction of Yates, estimating the confidence interval of the difference between both groups. The analysis will be carried out by intention to treat and per protocol.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection In Colon
NCT03803891
Colon Neoplasm, Malignant
Colo-rectal Cancer
Colonic Cancer
+7 more
UNKNOWN
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT00763425
Colorectal Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of Cold and Hot Snare Resection for Colorectal Polyps Sized 10-19mm.
NCT04451512
Colonic Polyps/Colonoscopy/Colorectal Neoplasms
UNKNOWN
A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy for 5-15 mm Colorectal Polyps
NCT04061005
Adenomatous Polyps
UNKNOWN
NA
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147
Polyp of Large Intestine
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that in 2008, 1233,000 new cases were diagnosed and more than 600,000 people died for this reason throughout the world. Colonoscopy is the technique of choice for both diagnosis and prevention, since the identification and removal of colonic adenomas reduces the incidence of CRC by up to 76%.
Different endoscopic techniques have been developed for the removal of adenomas; The choice of some over others is made according to the size, morphology and location of the lesion.
2. Hypothesis
Conceptual hypothesis:
Cold snare polypectomy presents a proportion of incomplete polypectomies similar to polypectomy with hot snare.
Operational hypothesis:
Two endoscopic techniques will be compared from two groups created by a random assignment to one or another type of polypectomy, evaluating the proportion of non-excised polypoid tissue after it. This will be done from random biopsies of the edges of the lesion and possible macroscopic remnants
3. Objectives.
Primary objective:
To compare the proportion of incomplete polypectomies in both types of polypectomy (cold snare vs. hot snare).
Secondary objectives:
Comparing the proportion of immediate and delayed bleeding complications, total and according to the severity that they present according to the American Society of Gastroenterology (ASGE) classification.
Comparing the evolution of abdominal pain in the 5 hours postprocedure between both groups.
Evaluating factors associated with an incomplete extirpation in each group. Evaluating factors associated with a failed cold polypectomy.
4. Design
Multicenter randomized clinical trial
5. Methods
Study population Patients scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy in a non-urgent setting. Patients will be invited to participate before performing the colonoscopy.
Randomization It will be done once the patient agrees to participate in the work and the first candidate polyp has been identified. Each patient will be randomized (regardless of the number of lesions per patient) so all lesions of each patient will be removed in the same way. It will be stratified by center.
Intervention Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and do not present any exclusion criteria (pre-endoscopic) will be invited to participate in the study. The informed consent will be completed according to the Spanish law 41/2002 of autonomy of the patient.
1. Endoscopic procedure The interventions will be carried out in each of the participating centers. The examinations will be performed under sedation according to the protocols established in each center. Once the first lesion is identified, the method of extirpation of the lesion will be randomized.
* Cold Group: polypectomy with a cold snare will be carried out according to the usual standards recommended by international societies. The lesion should be placed if possible in the position equivalent to 5 o'clock on the dial, the end of the snare will be placed several millimeters from the lesion and the tip of the catheter will be angled downwards, without aspiration at any time to avoid entrapment of the submucosa.
* Hot Group: polypectomy with snare connected to the electrosurgical unit according to the standards recommended by international societies, using a mixed current (cut-coagulation). Once the lesion is captured, the snare is pulled up to slightly separate it from the surrounding mucosa before polypectomy. Elevation of the lesion prior to polypectomy will not be performed.
* Common evaluation: once the polypectomies are completed, the base of the polypectomies will be evaluated, taking biopsies from any suggestive area and also 2 random biopsies at the base of the polypectomy.
2. Postendoscopic follow-up After a minimum of 21 days and a maximum of 28 days from the endoscopic examination, the patient will be contacted by telephone to collect the form about the evolution of the abdominal symptoms and to collect data about the appearance of complications (questions will be asked about visits to the hospital and in a targeted manner about the most frequent symptoms of the usual complications (fever, hemorrhage, abdominal pain).
3. Histological analysis The analysis of the specimens of the polypectomies will be carried out in each center according to their usual protocol. The analysis of the biopsies of the base of the polyp will be carried out centrally by a pathologist with more than 5 years of experience in digestive pathology. Samples from the base of the polyp will be sent periodically from each center to the Salamanca university hospital through a messenger service. The pathologist will be blinded regarding the histological diagnosis of the excised polyp and the type of polypectomy (although it is true that it is difficult to blind this last point since the presence of heat artifacts in those removed with a hot handle is very frequent). The samples sent for centralized analysis will not be stored, but will be destroyed once the study is completed according to standard protocols.
Sample size Assuming a proportion of incomplete polypectomies in both groups of 10% (using the taking of biopsies as a diagnostic pattern) and setting an equivalence limit of 7%, a total of 315 lesions per group are estimated to have an α risk of 5% and a power of 80%. Assuming a proportion of losses (polyps not recovered for histological study, polypectomies of the failed Cold group of 20%), an estimated 394 lesions per group are needed, with a total of 788 lesions in total.
Data Collection All the variables concerning the characteristics of the endoscopist, the patient and the injuries included will be collected in each center. The variables related to the histological diagnosis will be collected in the same way in the respective center. The variables concerning the follow-up will be collected in a centralized manner, through a telephone call that will be made between 3 and 4 weeks from the procedure. The variable related to the histological study of the base of the polyp will be collected in a centralized manner by the pathologist in charge of the analysis of the samples.
6\. Data management
Data from the data collection notebooks will be merged by the main researcher or collaborating researchers anonymously, encrypted and dissociated from the clinical information by means of a patient identification code (ID), in an online database. A copy of the database will be used in each participating center, which will be merged after completing the data collection. The responsible researcher will define an ID for each participant. The data entered in the database will be anonymous and the database will be protected with a password to which only the researchers will have access.
The unified file will be kept at the Río Hortega University Hospital and will be maintained until the end of the study. Regarding the application of the Organic Law on Data Protection 15/1999 and 1720/2007 that develops it, it should be noted that the protocol defined in the project oriented to epidemiological analysis, determines that the files will record information completely anonymized
7\. Statistical analysis
The Access program (Microsoft Corporation, Edmond, USA) will be used for the realization of the database and the statistical analysis of them will be carried out through the STATA program (StataCorp, 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, StataCorp LP). In the quantitative variables, the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation will be calculated (variables that do not follow a normal distribution according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be described with median, minimum, maximum and interquartile range), and the qualitative ones will be expressed as percentages and your 95% confidence intervals.
The analysis of the primary objective, the proportion of incomplete polypectomies in both groups will be compared by means of the z test of homogeneity without using the correction of Yates.
The confidence interval of the difference between the two groups will also be estimated. The analysis will be carried out by intention to treat, regardless of the type of polypectomy performed and per protocol (assigning the lesions assigned to the group Cold that are extirpated with hot snare to the Hot group). To evaluate possible confounding factors (endoscopist, nurse, snare type, location ...), the STATA confound user command will be used, defining as a significant change that which conditions a change in the odds ratio greater than 10% with respect to the one obtained with the complete model. In case several models do not present differences greater than 10%, the most parsimonious will be chosen.
Within the secondary objectives, the proportion of complications in both groups will be verified by the de2 test. To evaluate the factors associated with incomplete polypectomies and those associated with failed cold polypectomy, multivariate logistic regression techniques will be used.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that in 2008, 1233,000 new cases were diagnosed and more than 600,000 people died for this reason throughout the world. Colonoscopy is the technique of choice for both diagnosis and prevention, since the identification and removal of colonic adenomas reduces the incidence of CRC by up to 76%.
Different endoscopic techniques have been developed for the removal of adenomas; The choice of some over others is made according to the size, morphology and location of the lesion.
2. Hypothesis
Conceptual hypothesis:
Cold snare polypectomy presents a proportion of incomplete polypectomies similar to polypectomy with hot snare.
Operational hypothesis:
Two endoscopic techniques will be compared from two groups created by a random assignment to one or another type of polypectomy, evaluating the proportion of non-excised polypoid tissue after it. This will be done from random biopsies of the edges of the lesion and possible macroscopic remnants
3. Objectives.
Primary objective:
To compare the proportion of incomplete polypectomies in both types of polypectomy (cold snare vs. hot snare).
Secondary objectives:
Comparing the proportion of immediate and delayed bleeding complications, total and according to the severity that they present according to the American Society of Gastroenterology (ASGE) classification.
Comparing the evolution of abdominal pain in the 5 hours postprocedure between both groups.
Evaluating factors associated with an incomplete extirpation in each group. Evaluating factors associated with a failed cold polypectomy.
4. Design
Multicenter randomized clinical trial
5. Methods
Study population Patients scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy in a non-urgent setting. Patients will be invited to participate before performing the colonoscopy.
Randomization It will be done once the patient agrees to participate in the work and the first candidate polyp has been identified. Each patient will be randomized (regardless of the number of lesions per patient) so all lesions of each patient will be removed in the same way. It will be stratified by center.
Intervention Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and do not present any exclusion criteria (pre-endoscopic) will be invited to participate in the study. The informed consent will be completed according to the Spanish law 41/2002 of autonomy of the patient.
1. Endoscopic procedure The interventions will be carried out in each of the participating centers. The examinations will be performed under sedation according to the protocols established in each center. Once the first lesion is identified, the method of extirpation of the lesion will be randomized.
* Cold Group: polypectomy with a cold snare will be carried out according to the usual standards recommended by international societies. The lesion should be placed if possible in the position equivalent to 5 o'clock on the dial, the end of the snare will be placed several millimeters from the lesion and the tip of the catheter will be angled downwards, without aspiration at any time to avoid entrapment of the submucosa.
* Hot Group: polypectomy with snare connected to the electrosurgical unit according to the standards recommended by international societies, using a mixed current (cut-coagulation). Once the lesion is captured, the snare is pulled up to slightly separate it from the surrounding mucosa before polypectomy. Elevation of the lesion prior to polypectomy will not be performed.
* Common evaluation: once the polypectomies are completed, the base of the polypectomies will be evaluated, taking biopsies from any suggestive area and also 2 random biopsies at the base of the polypectomy.
2. Postendoscopic follow-up After a minimum of 21 days and a maximum of 28 days from the endoscopic examination, the patient will be contacted by telephone to collect the form about the evolution of the abdominal symptoms and to collect data about the appearance of complications (questions will be asked about visits to the hospital and in a targeted manner about the most frequent symptoms of the usual complications (fever, hemorrhage, abdominal pain).
3. Histological analysis The analysis of the specimens of the polypectomies will be carried out in each center according to their usual protocol. The analysis of the biopsies of the base of the polyp will be carried out centrally by a pathologist with more than 5 years of experience in digestive pathology. Samples from the base of the polyp will be sent periodically from each center to the Salamanca university hospital through a messenger service. The pathologist will be blinded regarding the histological diagnosis of the excised polyp and the type of polypectomy (although it is true that it is difficult to blind this last point since the presence of heat artifacts in those removed with a hot handle is very frequent). The samples sent for centralized analysis will not be stored, but will be destroyed once the study is completed according to standard protocols.
Sample size Assuming a proportion of incomplete polypectomies in both groups of 10% (using the taking of biopsies as a diagnostic pattern) and setting an equivalence limit of 7%, a total of 315 lesions per group are estimated to have an α risk of 5% and a power of 80%. Assuming a proportion of losses (polyps not recovered for histological study, polypectomies of the failed Cold group of 20%), an estimated 394 lesions per group are needed, with a total of 788 lesions in total.
Data Collection All the variables concerning the characteristics of the endoscopist, the patient and the injuries included will be collected in each center. The variables related to the histological diagnosis will be collected in the same way in the respective center. The variables concerning the follow-up will be collected in a centralized manner, through a telephone call that will be made between 3 and 4 weeks from the procedure. The variable related to the histological study of the base of the polyp will be collected in a centralized manner by the pathologist in charge of the analysis of the samples.
6\. Data management
Data from the data collection notebooks will be merged by the main researcher or collaborating researchers anonymously, encrypted and dissociated from the clinical information by means of a patient identification code (ID), in an online database. A copy of the database will be used in each participating center, which will be merged after completing the data collection. The responsible researcher will define an ID for each participant. The data entered in the database will be anonymous and the database will be protected with a password to which only the researchers will have access.
The unified file will be kept at the Río Hortega University Hospital and will be maintained until the end of the study. Regarding the application of the Organic Law on Data Protection 15/1999 and 1720/2007 that develops it, it should be noted that the protocol defined in the project oriented to epidemiological analysis, determines that the files will record information completely anonymized
7\. Statistical analysis
The Access program (Microsoft Corporation, Edmond, USA) will be used for the realization of the database and the statistical analysis of them will be carried out through the STATA program (StataCorp, 2013. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, StataCorp LP). In the quantitative variables, the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation will be calculated (variables that do not follow a normal distribution according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be described with median, minimum, maximum and interquartile range), and the qualitative ones will be expressed as percentages and your 95% confidence intervals.
The analysis of the primary objective, the proportion of incomplete polypectomies in both groups will be compared by means of the z test of homogeneity without using the correction of Yates.
The confidence interval of the difference between the two groups will also be estimated. The analysis will be carried out by intention to treat, regardless of the type of polypectomy performed and per protocol (assigning the lesions assigned to the group Cold that are extirpated with hot snare to the Hot group). To evaluate possible confounding factors (endoscopist, nurse, snare type, location ...), the STATA confound user command will be used, defining as a significant change that which conditions a change in the odds ratio greater than 10% with respect to the one obtained with the complete model. In case several models do not present differences greater than 10%, the most parsimonious will be chosen.
Within the secondary objectives, the proportion of complications in both groups will be verified by the de2 test. To evaluate the factors associated with incomplete polypectomies and those associated with failed cold polypectomy, multivariate logistic regression techniques will be used.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Polyp of Colon
Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Colonic Adenoma
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Participants
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
hot snare
polypectomy with hot snare
Group Type
OTHER
hot snare
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
polypectomy with hot snare
cold snare
polypectomy with cold snare
Group Type
OTHER
cold snare
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
polypectomy with cold snare
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
hot snare
polypectomy with hot snare
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
cold snare
polypectomy with cold snare
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients older than 18 years scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Absence of lesions of 5-9 mm.
* Contraindication for polypectomy (anticoagulant treatment, treatment with clopidogrel, coagulopathy or severe thrombocytopenia)
* Loss of polypectomy specimen
* Refusal to participate
* Contraindication for polypectomy (anticoagulant treatment, treatment with clopidogrel, coagulopathy or severe thrombocytopenia)
* Loss of polypectomy specimen
* Refusal to participate
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital del Rio Hortega
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marina de Benito Sanz
Principal investigator
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marina de Benito, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Río Hortega
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Rio Hortega
Valladolid, , Spain
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Spain
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S, Yokota I, Akamine E, Kato M, Akamatsu T, Tada K, Komeda Y, Iwatate M, Kawakami K, Nishikawa M, Watanabe D, Yamauchi A, Fukata N, Shimatani M, Ooi M, Fujita K, Sano Y, Kashida H, Hirose S, Iwagami H, Uedo N, Teramukai S, Tanaka K. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1950-1957. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Noda H, Ogasawara N, Sugiyama T, Yoshimine T, Tamura Y, Izawa S, Kondo Y, Ebi M, Funaki Y, Sasaki M, Kasugai K. The Influence of Snare Size on the Utility and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy for the Removal of Colonic Polyps in Japanese Patients. J Clin Med Res. 2016 Sep;8(9):662-6. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2646w. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Din S, Ball AJ, Riley SA, Kitsanta P, Johal S. A randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy versus a suction pseudopolyp technique. Endoscopy. 2015 Nov;47(11):1005-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392533. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, Anderson P, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Levy LC, Toor A, Mackenzie TA, Rosch T, Robertson DJ. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):74-80.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.043. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pattullo V, Bourke MJ, Tran KL, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Bailey AA, Alexander S, Mishra A, Co J. The suction pseudopolyp technique: a novel method for the removal of small flat nonpolypoid lesions of the colon and rectum. Endoscopy. 2009 Dec;41(12):1032-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215294. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion. 2011;84(1):78-81. doi: 10.1159/000323959. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Aslan F, Camci M, Alper E, Akpinar Z, Arabul M, Celik M, Unsal B. Cold snare polypectomy versus hot snare polypectomy in endoscopic treatment of small polyps. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;25(3):279-83. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2014.5085.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
The Effectiveness of an Exclusive Cold Snare Polypectomy Snare for the Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02036047
COMPLETED
NA
Cold Snare Polypectomy
NCT03501849
COMPLETED
NA
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598
COMPLETED
NA
Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT01646242
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal
NCT04727918
COMPLETED
NA
Cold Snare,Hot Snare and APC Polypectomy for the Complete Removal of Small Left Sided Colon Polyps
NCT02479893
COMPLETED
Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
NCT04232176
COMPLETED
Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps
NCT02239536
COMPLETED
NA
Prospective Comparison of Cold Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents
NCT01553565
COMPLETED
NA
A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps
NCT03647176
COMPLETED
NA
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650
COMPLETED
NA
Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT03373136
COMPLETED
NA
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT02476747
UNKNOWN
NA
Cold EMR Vs Standard EMR for the Treatment of Large Nonpedunculated Homogeneous Colorectal Lesions
NCT04418843
COMPLETED
NA
Improving Complete Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT01471756
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Injured Submucosal Arteries After CSP for 10-19 mm Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps.
NCT05930041
COMPLETED
NA
Surveillance Intervals After Piecemeal Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions ≥20mm
NCT06791616
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Randomised Comparison of 2 Cold Snare Polypectomy Techniques
NCT02208401
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of EMR-P With Conventional EMR
NCT04191473
UNKNOWN
NA
Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT06271941
RECRUITING
NA
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06937047
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Efficacy and Safety Research of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Hot Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of 4-9 mm Diameter Colorectal 0-Isp and 0-Ip Polyps: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study(FAST -REST Study)
NCT06658561
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (C-EMR) Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (H-EMR) for Large Colorectal Polyps (10-20 mm)
NCT06180798
RECRUITING
NA
Comparison of Prophylactic Clip and Detachable Snare
NCT01406379
COMPLETED
NA
Underwater EMR vs. Conventional EMR for Large Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyp
NCT03567746
UNKNOWN
NA