A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps

NCT ID: NCT03647176

Last Updated: 2020-03-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-03

Study Completion Date

2020-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cause of death from cancer worldwide. Colonoscopy allows removal of adenomatous polyps is the best colorectal cancer screening, according to the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Recent studies have reported approximately 30% of interval cancer may be incomplete polyp resection. Complete polyp resection may be particularly important when implementing new methods for surveillance colonoscopies. Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is considered to be a safer procedure for removing subcentimeter lesions than conventional hot snare polypectomy (HSP). CSP removal of polyps sized ≤5 mm have recommended by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline as the preferred technique. Previous report said that the complete resection rate of CSP for adenomatous polyps 4-9 mm in size was comparable to that of HSP, and in the foreseeable future CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps. However, data on complete resection of colorectal polyps 1.0-1.5 mm in size is sparse. Investigators are interested in comparison of the resection rate of cold snare polypectomy for large (10-15 mm) and small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps using CSP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participantswho meet inclusion criteria will be asked to participate, investigators will include all patients with resectable polyps, but only adenomatous polyps will be included for analysis. See also inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Colonoscopy, after bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol solution was performed using standard colonoscopes (CF-HQ290I, CF-Q260AI) and polypectomy snares(13mm Captivator and 10mm Captivator II).

All procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists (each with over 1000 colonoscopies performed) including CSP. All polyps between 5 and 15mm will be removed with a polypectomy snare. Polyp size will be measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5mm). Difficulty of resection will be grade by polyp resection time. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, for large lesions (10-15mm) 4 biopsies will be performed from all four quadrants of resection margins, for small lesions (5-9mm) biopsies were performed from two marginal sites located symmetrically on the left and right of the mucosal defects to confirm residual polyp tissue.

If polyp resection is complicated by bleeding (not self-sustained), no biopsies will be taken and any additional polyps that will be found during the remaining examination will be excluded from analysis. Severe bleeding that will complicate resection margins examination will be excluded from analysis, Endoscopic haemostasis will be performed when active haemorrhage continued for ≥30s.

A single research subject may have many eligible polyps. To avoid taking many biopsies, the investigators will not include more than 5 eligible polyps (the first 5 that are detected) per patient in the study.

Laboratory Analysis:

The polyps will be evaluated by experienced pathologists according to Vienna classification. Resection margins for each polyp will be recorded as: R0= adenomatous tissue free, R1=adenomatous tissue detection. Investigators will only include adenomatous polyps in the analysis. for financial requests of the resection margin biopsies. The pathological diagnosis of the biopsies will become part of the medical record. If biopsies contain adenomatous tissue the participants will be ask to return for a follow-up colonoscopy within six month.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adenomatous Polyps

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

small polyps

Cold snare polypectomy ; Polyp size will be measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5mm).Small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps will be removed with a polypectomy snare. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, biopsies were performed from two marginal sites located symmetrically on the left and right of the mucosal defects to confirm residual polyp tissue.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cold snare polypectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

cold snare polypectomy (CSP), which does not include electrocautery to do a polypectomy with a snare

large polyps

Cold snare polypectomy; Polyp size will be measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5mm). Large (10-15 mm) colorectal polyps will be removed with a polypectomy snare. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, 4 biopsies will be performed from all four quadrants of resection margins.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cold snare polypectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

cold snare polypectomy (CSP), which does not include electrocautery to do a polypectomy with a snare

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cold snare polypectomy

cold snare polypectomy (CSP), which does not include electrocautery to do a polypectomy with a snare

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient ≥40 and \<85
* Provide written informed consent
* Patients are found to have colorectal polyps between 5 and 15mm in size

Exclusion Criteria

* History of inflammatory bowel disease
* Polyposis of the alimentary tract
* Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy 5 days before the procedure
* Pregnancy
* Haemodialysis
* An American Society of Anaesthesiologists class III or higher
* Depressed lesions and lesions highly suspected to be cancerous based on endoscopic appearance
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yuqi He

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yuqi He

Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

tianyang zhang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital

Beijing, Dongcheng District, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S, Yokota I, Akamine E, Kato M, Akamatsu T, Tada K, Komeda Y, Iwatate M, Kawakami K, Nishikawa M, Watanabe D, Yamauchi A, Fukata N, Shimatani M, Ooi M, Fujita K, Sano Y, Kashida H, Hirose S, Iwagami H, Uedo N, Teramukai S, Tanaka K. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1950-1957. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28970290 (View on PubMed)

Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Ito T, Aoi K, Nagai K, Kanesaka T, Matsui F, Fujii M, Akasaka T, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Tomita Y, Ito Y, Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N. Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):251-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-100215. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28192823 (View on PubMed)

Ma X, Feng X, Li Y, Du Y, Wang J, Wu Y, Jin H, Xie X, Wang X, Jin P, Yang L, Wang H, Leung J, Sheng J, He Y. A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34798334 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PLA GH-CSP-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.