Endocuff Vision Assisted vs. Standard Polyp Resection in the Colorectum

NCT ID: NCT03117114

Last Updated: 2019-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-01

Study Completion Date

2019-06-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Adenomas are premalignant polyps of the colon that should be resected endoscopically. Complete resection of adenomatous polyps is the major task of colonoscopy. In some cases polyp may be poorly accessible making endoscopic resection difficult. Polypectomy may be conducted using the so-called piece meal technique in these cases. However, leaving polyp residual polyps in the colon bears the risk of malignant degeneration as colorectal cancer may arise form adenomatous remnants. In case of difficult polyp locations endoscopic resection may also be time consuming. On the other hand endoscopists are facing an increased time pressure due to rising numbers of procedures during the last decades.

The Endocuff Vision device (EVD) is a cap that can be mounted to the tip of a standard endoscope. The EVD has small flexible branches on its outside. The branches turn out during withdrawal. By that the branches are getting in contact with colonic wall. This mechanism leads to a more stabilized position of the colonoscope in the bowel. It is hypothesized that resection circumstances may be improved by using an EVD. In addition, stabilizing the scope during resection may result in a reduced time effort. Until now no controlled trials exist investigating the effect of EVD on the time effect during polyp resection. Therefore a randomized controlled trial needed comparing standard polypectomy versus polypectomy using the EVD during routine colonoscopy procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Polyp

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Arm

Standard colonoscopy without mounted Endocuff Vision device. Therefore standard polypectomy in case of polyp resection.

Group Type OTHER

Standard polypectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

Absence of an EVD, standard polypectomy

Endocuff Vision Arm

Endocuff Vision device mounted to the endoscope prior to the beginning of the procedure. Therefore EVD assisted polypectomy in case of polyp resection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endocuff Vision assisted polypectomy

Intervention Type DEVICE

EVD mounted to the tip of the endoscope, therefore EVD assisted polypectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endocuff Vision assisted polypectomy

EVD mounted to the tip of the endoscope, therefore EVD assisted polypectomy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard polypectomy

Absence of an EVD, standard polypectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* indication for colonoscopy
* age ≥ 40 years

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV or higher
* pregnant women
* indication for colonoscopy: inflammatory bowel disease
* indication for colonoscopy: polyposis syndrome
* indication for colonoscopy: emergency colonoscopy e.g. acute bleeding
* contraindication for polyp resection e.g. patients on warfarin


\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Klare, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Technical University of Munich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

von Figura G, Hasenohrl M, Haller B, Poszler A, Ulrich J, Brown H, Abdelhafez M, Schmid RM, von Delius S, Klare P. Endocuff vision-assisted vs. standard polyp resection in the colorectum (the EVASTA study): a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy. 2020 Jan;52(1):45-51. doi: 10.1055/a-1018-1870. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31614373 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EVASTA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Real Life AI in Polyp Detection
NCT04335318 COMPLETED NA