Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-12-31
2018-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The bigger a polyp is the greater the chance is of it being malignant. During colonoscopy polyp size can be estimated visually by comparing the polyp with an opened biopsy forceps. The span of an opened forceps is 7 mm. Prior to using this technique, the forceps has to be inserted into the colon through a small working channel of the endoscope. Information on the actual adenoma size is crucial as surveillance recommendations depend on the size of the resected polyps. Moreover current guidelines contain the possibilities to disregard hyperplastic polyps in the sigmoid colon if the polyp size is below 5 mm. This means that diminutive hyperplastic polyps (\< 5mm) do not necessarily require resection due to their benign dignity. However, there is increasing evidence that large human bias effects exist in estimating the size of polypoid lesions. For example, it has been shown that endoscopists exhibit terminal digit preferences leading to an exaggeration of estimated polyp size. In consequence the human bias problem might lead to wrong adenoma surveillance decisions.
There is no doubt that technical devices are needed which can support endoscopists in finding the right declaration of polyp sizes. The aim of the current project is to create a computer program that is able to automatically measure polyp sizes during colonoscopy.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients \>= 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* indication for colonoscopy: inflammatory bowel disease
* indication for colonoscopy: polyposis syndrome
* indication for colonoscopy: emergency colonoscopy e.g. acute bleeding
* contraindication for polyp resection e.g. patients on warfarin
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Technical University of Munich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
II Medizinische Klinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Peter Klare, MD
Role: primary
Stefan von Delius, Prof.
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAMP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id