Comparison of Adenoma Detection Rate in 3D vs. 2D Surveillance Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT07076966

Last Updated: 2025-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is substantial evidence confirming that identifying and removing colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy helps prevent the development of colorectal cancer. Among the quality indicators for colonoscopy, adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the most important, as it is closely related to the patient's future risk of colorectal cancer. Recent studies have further demonstrated that improving ADR can reduce future mortality from colorectal cancer. Notably, non-polypoid lesions (such as flat or depressed lesions) are more likely to be missed during traditional colonoscopy, making these lesions a leading cause of post-colonoscopy interval colorectal cancer.

In a prospective trial conducted by our team comparing the ADR of 3D colonoscopy with standard 2D colonoscopy, we found that 3D colonoscopy significantly improved overall ADR and the detection rate of non-polypoid adenomas.

According to current international guidelines, after an index colonoscopy, patients are recommended to undergo surveillance colonoscopy 1 to 10 years later, depending on their findings at index colonoscopy. Since these patients represent the majority in clinical practice, increasing the ADR during surveillance colonoscopy not only allows for more precise recommendations for the timing of the next colonoscopy but also effectively reduces the risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC).

Therefore, this multicenter, prospective, randomized trial aims to compare the clinical performance of 3D colonoscopy and standard 2D colonoscopy in the context of surveillance colonoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Rate Three Dimensional Colon Polyps and Adenomas

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

3D colonoscopy versus standard 2D colonoscopy
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3D colonoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3D device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use 3D machine to generate the 3D image

2D colonoscopy

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3D device

Use 3D machine to generate the 3D image

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects who are 40 years of older
* Subjects who receive colonoscopy and polypectomy more the 1 year
* Subjects who need surveillance colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication for colonoscopy
* Subjects with familiar or hereditary polyposis
* Subjects with history of colectomy
* Inadequate bowel cleansing level
* Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Statistical Center, NTUHCTC

Attending physician, Department of Internal Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu Branch

Hsinchu, Taiwan, Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

National Taiwan University Cancer Center

Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Li-Chun Chang, MD. PhD.

Role: CONTACT

886-9-72-651-258

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hsuan-Ho Lin, MD, MSc

Role: primary

886-2-23123456

Hao-Che Chang, MD

Role: primary

886-2-23123456

Li-Chun Chang, MD. PhD.

Role: primary

886-9-72-651-258

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202311019DIPC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of AI on Trainee ADR
NCT05423964 UNKNOWN NA