Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection or Conventional Polypectomy
NCT ID: NCT01950117
Last Updated: 2014-11-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to compare the incomplete resection rate of neoplastic large polyps after EMR or conventional polypectomy. The EMR technique is preferable to conventional polypectomy for the complete resection of the large polyps (\>15 mm in diameter)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Submucosal Injection EMR vs. Underwater EMR for Colorectal Polyps
NCT01712048
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Versus Standard Therapy of the Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT03868605
Improving Complete Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT01471756
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598
Prospective Comparison of Cold Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents
NCT01553565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional polypectomy
Colorectal polyps from 10 mm to 25 mm was found. Submucosal injection of saline solution before removal was not performed for polypectomy. The snare used for polypectomy was a dual loop wire snare with a loop size of 33/16 mm (SN-3316LX, Medico's Hirata Inc., Osaka, Japan). An ERBE ICC200 (Amco, Tokyo, Japan) was used in the Endocut mode with the effect 3 current set at output limit 120W and forced coagulation current set at output limit 35W for conventional polypectomy. Prophylactic clipping after polyp removal was routinely performed.
Conventional polypectomy
Nonpedunculated neoplastic colorectal polyps from 10 mm to 25 mm in diameter were resected using conventional polypectomy. Submucosal injection of saline solution before removal was not performed.
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Colorectal polyp from 10 mm to 25 mm was found. Submucosal injection of saline solution before removal was performed for EMR. The snare used for EMR was a dual loop wire snare with a loop size of 33/16 mm (SN-3316LX, Medico's Hirata Inc., Osaka, Japan). An ERBE ICC200 (Amco, Tokyo, Japan) was used in the Endocut mode with the effect 3 current set at output limit 120W and forced coagulation current set at output limit 35W for EMR. Prophylactic clipping after polyp removal was routinely performed.
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Nonpedunculated neoplastic colorectal polyps from 10 mm to 25 mm in diameter were resected after submucosal injection of saline solution before removal.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Nonpedunculated neoplastic colorectal polyps from 10 mm to 25 mm in diameter were resected after submucosal injection of saline solution before removal.
Conventional polypectomy
Nonpedunculated neoplastic colorectal polyps from 10 mm to 25 mm in diameter were resected using conventional polypectomy. Submucosal injection of saline solution before removal was not performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Showa Inan General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Akira Horiuchi
Chief, Digestive Disease Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Showa Inan General Hospital
Komagane, Nagano, Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EMR vs. polypectomy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.