Submucosal Injection EMR vs. Underwater EMR for Colorectal Polyps

NCT ID: NCT01712048

Last Updated: 2020-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two standard methods of polypectomy (polyp removal), submucosal injection-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and full water emersion (without submucosal injection) EMR, for large colorectal polyps.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The endoscopic resection of benign colon polyps (polypectomy) plays a vital role in the prevention of colo-rectal cancer. While, small pedunculated polyps are removed with ease, large flat lesions pose a greater challenge. As a result, special techniques have been developed to assist in the removal of these difficult polyps.

During conventional colonoscopy with polypectomy, the colon lumen is insufflated with air, which flattens polyps and thins the wall of the colon. These two factors increase the risk of procedural complications such as bleeding and perforation. In order to counter these drawbacks a technique, which involves the injection of saline into the submucosal area beneath the polyp, is commonly used for the resection of large flat polyps. Theoretically, the injection creates a "safety cushion" that reduces the risks of accidental ensnarement of the muscularis propria, which can lead to iatrogenic perforation and thermal injury to the deeper tissue layers. However, the submucosal injection technique is cumbersome in patients with particularly large polyps as multiple injections are often necessary, which can blur the line between normal and abnormal tissue.

Water emersion colonoscopy is a well-established alternative to conventional "air" colonoscopy and is in fact preferred by many endoscopists. Studies have shown that using water instead of air decreases the discomfort of colonoscopy, measured by the amount of sedative and pain medication used, time to complete the colonoscopy, and recovery time, and increases cecal intubation rates. Interventional Endoscopy Services (IES) at CPMC has taken the concepts of water emersion colonoscopy one step further in order to developed a novel method of "underwater" EMR. This technique was inspired by the observation that the muscularis propria of the colon retains its native thickness (1-2 mm) and circular configuration during underwater EUS examination. Furthermore, water immersion "floats" mucosal lesions away from the deeper wall layers, eliminating the need for a "safety cushion" created by submucosal injection. One drawback to the underwater technique is that in the case of poor preps, residual feces in the colon is suspended in the water, interfering with visualization. Additionally, the use of water often causes soiling of the gurney as a result of water seepage from the rectum during the procedure, which requires additional sanitary attention during the procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonic Polyps Rectal Polyps

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Submucosal Injection EMR

For patients who are randomized to the "submucosal injection" arm polypectomy will be performed with selective saline injection to the layer of tissue underneath the polyp in order to create a "safety cushion" for resection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Submucosal Injection EMR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Selective saline injection is applied to the layer of tissue underneath the polyp in order to create a "safety cushion" for resection. EMR is then performed with a standard snare.

Underwater EMR

For patients who are randomized to the "underwater" arm polypectomy with water will be performed under full water emersion without the use of submucosal injection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Underwater EMR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Polypectomy is performed under full water emersion without the use of submucosal injection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Submucosal Injection EMR

Selective saline injection is applied to the layer of tissue underneath the polyp in order to create a "safety cushion" for resection. EMR is then performed with a standard snare.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Underwater EMR

Polypectomy is performed under full water emersion without the use of submucosal injection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients age \>18 years that are scheduled for endoscopic resection of large colo-rectal lesions who consent to this study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unable to provide informed consent.
* Patients with lesions showing adenoma invasion into the muscularis propria on EUS.
* Patients without at least one colo-rectal lesions ≥ 20mm.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kenneth Binmoeller

Interventional Endoscopy Program Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth Binmoeller, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

California Pacific Medical Center

Christopher Hamerski, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

California Pacific Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

California Pacific Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

ROSENBERG N. Submucosal saline wheal as safety factor in fulguration or rectal and sigmoidal polypi. AMA Arch Surg. 1955 Jan;70(1):120-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1955.01270070122021. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13217613 (View on PubMed)

Norton ID, Wang L, Levine SA, Burgart LJ, Hofmeister EK, Rumalla A, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT. Efficacy of colonic submucosal saline solution injection for the reduction of iatrogenic thermal injury. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jul;56(1):95-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.125362.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12085042 (View on PubMed)

Nelson DB. Techniques for difficult polypectomy. MedGenMed. 2004 Oct 25;6(4):12. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15775839 (View on PubMed)

Zarchy T. Risk of submucosal saline injection for colonic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jul;46(1):89-90. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70222-0. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9260717 (View on PubMed)

Kudo S, Kashida H, Nakajima T, Tamura S, Nakajo K. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 1997 Sep;21(7):694-701. doi: 10.1007/s002689900293.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9276699 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012.070-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PULSed Field ablAtion of coloRectal Polyps
NCT06317727 NOT_YET_RECRUITING