Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) vs Cold EMR With Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)
NCT ID: NCT05041478
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-19
2028-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Lateral Spreading Lesions - A Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT04138030
Soft Coagulation for the Prevention of Adenoma Recurrence
NCT01789749
Cold EMR Vs Standard EMR for the Treatment of Large Nonpedunculated Homogeneous Colorectal Lesions
NCT04418843
Cold or Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10-19mm Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05545787
Recurrences After Standard EMR vs Plus Thermal Ablation EMR
NCT05121805
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conventional EMR is well-established for the resection of lateral-spreading adenomas and has been shown to be highly efficacious with adjuvant STSC. Cauterisation-related complications occur relatively frequently and while endoscopically treatable, still carry morbidity not seen in current cold snare polypectomy data.
Cold snare polypectomy has an excellent safety profile for smaller polyps, without cauterisation-related adverse events. Limited data on cold EMR for large adenomatous laterally-spreading lesions shows minimal complications. Efficacy, however, is yet to be evaluated in prospective randomised trials. Observational data demonstrates recurrence rates exceeding conventional EMR. Since STSC causes significant reduction in recurrence in conventional EMR, the safety and efficacy of this adjuvant technique, when compared to isolated cold snare EMR, has theoretical advantages in both safety and efficacy.
The safety and efficacy of these two techniques will therefore be compared in a randomised controlled trial.
Hypothesis:
Cold snare EMR of 15-40mm lateral-spreading adenomas with adjuvant STSC is expected to be superior regarding complete resection and adenoma recurrence rates as compared to cold snare EMR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cold EMR with adjuvant STSC to margins
Standard cold EMR technique with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation to defect margins
Cold Snare Endoscopic mucosal resection with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation
Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare. Following this defect margins are treated with electrocautery to create a rim of ablated tissue.
Cold EMR
Standard Cold EMR resection technique
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cold Snare Endoscopic mucosal resection with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation
Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare. Following this defect margins are treated with electrocautery to create a rim of ablated tissue.
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Localisation in the colon or rectum
* Benign adenomatous surface features (Kudo III / IV, Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) 2a)
* Granular or non-granular topography
* Paris classification 0-IIa/IIb +/- Is
* If present, sessile component may be no greater than 10mm in size.
* Polyp size ranging from 15 to 40mm
Exclusion Criteria
* Known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy.
* Pregnancy
* History of inflammatory bowel disease
* Previously attempted or otherwise non-lifting lesions
* Endoscopic features suggestive of submucosal invasion (Kudo Vi/n, JNET 2b / 3) or concurrent colorectal cancer
* Lesions involving the ileocaecal valve (ICV), appendiceal oriface or anorectal junction (ARJ)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Western Sydney Local Health District
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Professor Michael Bourke
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Bourke, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Westmead Hospital (WSLHD)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Westmead Endoscopy Unit
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ETH11029
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.