Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) vs Cold EMR With Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)

NCT ID: NCT05041478

Last Updated: 2025-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-19

Study Completion Date

2028-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomised controlled trial comparing cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with cold snare EMR and adjuvant margin STSC in the complete resection of 15-40mm lateral-spreading adenomas

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale:

Conventional EMR is well-established for the resection of lateral-spreading adenomas and has been shown to be highly efficacious with adjuvant STSC. Cauterisation-related complications occur relatively frequently and while endoscopically treatable, still carry morbidity not seen in current cold snare polypectomy data.

Cold snare polypectomy has an excellent safety profile for smaller polyps, without cauterisation-related adverse events. Limited data on cold EMR for large adenomatous laterally-spreading lesions shows minimal complications. Efficacy, however, is yet to be evaluated in prospective randomised trials. Observational data demonstrates recurrence rates exceeding conventional EMR. Since STSC causes significant reduction in recurrence in conventional EMR, the safety and efficacy of this adjuvant technique, when compared to isolated cold snare EMR, has theoretical advantages in both safety and efficacy.

The safety and efficacy of these two techniques will therefore be compared in a randomised controlled trial.

Hypothesis:

Cold snare EMR of 15-40mm lateral-spreading adenomas with adjuvant STSC is expected to be superior regarding complete resection and adenoma recurrence rates as compared to cold snare EMR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Polyp Colon Adenoma Colon Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomised Controlled Trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Blinding

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cold EMR with adjuvant STSC to margins

Standard cold EMR technique with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation to defect margins

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cold Snare Endoscopic mucosal resection with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare. Following this defect margins are treated with electrocautery to create a rim of ablated tissue.

Cold EMR

Standard Cold EMR resection technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cold Snare Endoscopic mucosal resection with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare. Following this defect margins are treated with electrocautery to create a rim of ablated tissue.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Use of injected chromogelofusine solution to raise a lesion prior to polypectomy. Lesion then removed with a stiff thin-wired snare.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient undergoing colonoscopy who is older than 18 years of age, has a written consent for trial participation and has at least one laterally spreading lesion meeting the following description:
* Localisation in the colon or rectum
* Benign adenomatous surface features (Kudo III / IV, Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) 2a)
* Granular or non-granular topography
* Paris classification 0-IIa/IIb +/- Is
* If present, sessile component may be no greater than 10mm in size.
* Polyp size ranging from 15 to 40mm

Exclusion Criteria

* Current use of antiplatelet (excluding aspirin) or anticoagulants which have not appropriately been interrupted according to the guidelines.
* Known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy.
* Pregnancy
* History of inflammatory bowel disease
* Previously attempted or otherwise non-lifting lesions
* Endoscopic features suggestive of submucosal invasion (Kudo Vi/n, JNET 2b / 3) or concurrent colorectal cancer
* Lesions involving the ileocaecal valve (ICV), appendiceal oriface or anorectal junction (ARJ)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Western Sydney Local Health District

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Professor Michael Bourke

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Bourke, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Westmead Hospital (WSLHD)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Westmead Endoscopy Unit

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Michael Bourke, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Clarence Kerrison, MBBS

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ETH11029

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.