Full Thickness Resection or Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Difficult Colorectal Lesions.

NCT ID: NCT05502276

Last Updated: 2022-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection a full thickness (EFTR) with Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) System versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG), "no lift" lesions colon and residual / relapse on scars from previous resections endoscopic colon. The dimensional cut off of these lesions is ≤30mm

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

The Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) procedures will be performed with the devices commonly used at the Services of Endoscopy of the Centers participating in the study. There are several models of knives on the market, produced by different companies, all considered equally effective by international guidelines.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection using standard procedure described in international guidelines.

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR)

The FTRD® (Full Thickness Resection Device; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) is the only over-the-scope device designed to undergo Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR) using a "clip-and-cut" technique. It consists of a 14 mm modified over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) mounted on the outside of a 23 mm cap, which has a preloaded 13 mm monofilament loop at the end. This device received the CE mark for the lower digestive tract in September 2014 and its efficacy and safety have been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Full Thickness Endoscopic Resection using the FTRD Ovesco Device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR)

Full Thickness Endoscopic Resection using the FTRD Ovesco Device

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

Standard Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection using standard procedure described in international guidelines.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients of age \>18 years
* Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG) ≤ 3cm in diameter
* "no-lift" colic injuries ≤ 3cm in diameter
* residual / recurrence on the scar of previous endoscopic resections of the colon ≤ 3cm in diameter

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnant women
* failure to accept or understand the consent to participate in the study
* patients with severe coagulopathies
* patients with short life expectancy (Charlson comorbidity index ≥8)
* patients with expired general clinical conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giulio Antonelli

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale Dei Castelli

Ariccia, Rome, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andrisani G, Hassan C, Pizzicannella M, Pugliese F, Mutignani M, Campanale C, Valerii G, Barbera C, Antonelli G, Di Matteo FM. Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Dec;98(6):987-997.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37390864 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RESECT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.