Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Large Recto-sigmoid Lesions Under Spinal Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT06316401

Last Updated: 2024-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators collected data on all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for recto-sigmoid laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) \>35 mm under SA between January 2021 and March 2024. The investigators evaluated the technical success and safety of SA in terms of ARAEs, and pain, measured via visual assessment scale (VAS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and study aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of large colorectal lesions requires the patient to be in a still position for a long time. Both deep sedation and general anesthesia carry a substantial risk of anesthesia-related adverse events (ARAEs), especially in frail patients. Conversely, mild-to-moderate sedation does not prevent involuntary movements of the patient. Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe and simple technique that provides analgesia and motor block without systemic drug administration or orotracheal intubation. As the use of SA in colorectal endoscopic resections has not been described so far, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of SA in large (\>35 mm) recto-sigmoid lesion ESD.

Patients and methods: The investigators collected data on all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for recto-sigmoid laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) \>35 mm under SA between January 2021 and March 2024. The investigators evaluated the technical success and safety of SA in terms of ARAEs, and pain, measured via visual assessment scale (VAS). The secondary endpoints were as follows: intra- and post-procedural need for additional opioid or other analgesic drug administration, ESD-related adverse eventss, length of hospital stay, and median ESD duration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal (Colon or Rectal) Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection under spinal anesthesia

We collected data on all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for recto-sigmoid laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) \>35 mm under SA.

SA was carried out in a sitting position, following a strictly aseptic technique. After recognition of L2-L3 intervertebral space through landmark technique, a 25 Gauge needle was inserted and the correct positioning was confirmed by detecting free flow of cerebrospinal fluid. Subsequently, 10-12 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine + sufentanil 2 mcg according to the decision of the anesthetist was administered intrathecally without barbotage.

Subsequently, the patient underwent ESD of the colorectal lesion.

ESD of large LSTs under SA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal lesions under spinal anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ESD of large LSTs under SA

endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal lesions under spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age ≥18 years
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score I-IV
* ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* age \<18 years
* ASA score V
* allergy to medications used for spinal anesthesia
* pregnancy
* breastfeeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda USL Modena

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Mauro Manno

Directore Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mauro Manno, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AUSL Modena

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mauro Manno

Carpi, MO, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

03-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.