Performance of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to the Sedation Method

NCT ID: NCT01806753

Last Updated: 2014-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

157 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although proper sedation is mandatory for endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, the effects of sedation on ESD performance and complications have not been fully evaluated. In the investigators previous retrospective study, en bloc resection and complete resection rates, and procedure time could be improved by sedation with continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration by anesthesiologists. However, there are several limitations to the study including retrospective design. The investigators aimed to evaluate the relationship among sedation methods, satisfaction of endoscopists or patients, clinical outcomes, and complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Gastric Cancer Gastric Adenoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

midazolam/propofol injection

Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this arm1, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by endoscopists.

First, pethidine 50 mg with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.

When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, endoscopists should check the Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS).

If MOAAS is 5 or 6, propofol 0.25 mg/kg will be injected. Otherwise, pethidine 12.5 mg will be injected.

propofol infusion

Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this arm2, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by anesthesiologists.

First, remifentanil 0.5 ug/kg with propofol 0.5 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.

Then, remifentanil 0.08 ug/kg/min and propofol 2 mg/kg/h are infused continuously.

When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, anesthesiologists should check the MOAAS.

If MOAAS is 5 or 6, infusion rate of propofol will be increased by 0.5 mg/kg/h. Otherwise, infusion rate of remifentanil will be increased by 0.02 ug/kg/min.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist

In this arm1, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by endoscopists.

First, pethidine 50 mg with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.

When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, endoscopists should check the Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS).

If MOAAS is 5 or 6, propofol 0.25 mg/kg will be injected. Otherwise, pethidine 12.5 mg will be injected.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration

In this arm2, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by anesthesiologists.

First, remifentanil 0.5 ug/kg with propofol 0.5 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.

Then, remifentanil 0.08 ug/kg/min and propofol 2 mg/kg/h are infused continuously.

When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, anesthesiologists should check the MOAAS.

If MOAAS is 5 or 6, infusion rate of propofol will be increased by 0.5 mg/kg/h. Otherwise, infusion rate of remifentanil will be increased by 0.02 ug/kg/min.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age, between 20 and 80
2. Early gastric cancer or adenoma, which is indicated by endoscopic submucosal dissection
3. ECOG performance status 0 or 1
4. American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status 1, 2, or 3

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous subtotal gastrectomy
2. Previous gastrostomy
3. Repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection
4. Three or more synchronous lesions
5. Allergy to midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, or remifentanil
6. Pregnancy or breast milk feeding
7. Active infection
8. Significant cardiopulmonary disease
9. Active hepatitis or severe hepatic dysfunction
10. Severe renal dysfunction
11. Severe bone marrow dysfunction
12. Severe neurologic or psychotic disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Severance Hospital

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Park CH, Shin S, Lee SK, Lee H, Lee YC, Park JC, Yoo YC. Assessing the stability and safety of procedure during endoscopic submucosal dissection according to sedation methods: a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0120529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120529. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25803441 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2012-0661

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.