Performance of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to the Sedation Method
NCT ID: NCT01806753
Last Updated: 2014-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
157 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Midazolam Premedication on the Satisfaction Levels of Patients After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT02504164
Comparison of the Effects of Target-Controlled Infusion Method and Manual Propofol Administration on Respiratory Function, Recovery, and Electroencephalogram in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Cases
NCT07305857
The Efficacy and Safety of the COMBO Endoscopy Oropharyngeal Airway in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedure
NCT06081647
Efficacy of Bispectral Index Monitoring for Midazolam and Meperidine Induced Sedation During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT01157598
Pain After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT02254889
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
midazolam/propofol injection
Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist
Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist
In this arm1, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by endoscopists.
First, pethidine 50 mg with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.
When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, endoscopists should check the Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS).
If MOAAS is 5 or 6, propofol 0.25 mg/kg will be injected. Otherwise, pethidine 12.5 mg will be injected.
propofol infusion
Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration
Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration
In this arm2, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by anesthesiologists.
First, remifentanil 0.5 ug/kg with propofol 0.5 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.
Then, remifentanil 0.08 ug/kg/min and propofol 2 mg/kg/h are infused continuously.
When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, anesthesiologists should check the MOAAS.
If MOAAS is 5 or 6, infusion rate of propofol will be increased by 0.5 mg/kg/h. Otherwise, infusion rate of remifentanil will be increased by 0.02 ug/kg/min.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist
In this arm1, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by endoscopists.
First, pethidine 50 mg with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.
When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, endoscopists should check the Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS).
If MOAAS is 5 or 6, propofol 0.25 mg/kg will be injected. Otherwise, pethidine 12.5 mg will be injected.
Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration
In this arm2, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by anesthesiologists.
First, remifentanil 0.5 ug/kg with propofol 0.5 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.
Then, remifentanil 0.08 ug/kg/min and propofol 2 mg/kg/h are infused continuously.
When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, anesthesiologists should check the MOAAS.
If MOAAS is 5 or 6, infusion rate of propofol will be increased by 0.5 mg/kg/h. Otherwise, infusion rate of remifentanil will be increased by 0.02 ug/kg/min.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Early gastric cancer or adenoma, which is indicated by endoscopic submucosal dissection
3. ECOG performance status 0 or 1
4. American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status 1, 2, or 3
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous gastrostomy
3. Repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection
4. Three or more synchronous lesions
5. Allergy to midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, or remifentanil
6. Pregnancy or breast milk feeding
7. Active infection
8. Significant cardiopulmonary disease
9. Active hepatitis or severe hepatic dysfunction
10. Severe renal dysfunction
11. Severe bone marrow dysfunction
12. Severe neurologic or psychotic disorder
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Severance Hospital
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Park CH, Shin S, Lee SK, Lee H, Lee YC, Park JC, Yoo YC. Assessing the stability and safety of procedure during endoscopic submucosal dissection according to sedation methods: a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0120529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120529. eCollection 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2012-0661
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.