Efficacy of Hemostatic Powder in Preventing Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in High-risk Patients: A Prospective Randomized Control Study

NCT ID: NCT03169569

Last Updated: 2020-03-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

143 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-01

Study Completion Date

2019-05-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial gastric neoplasm is minimally invasive and achieves curative resection with an acceptable rate of adverse events. Although the safety of ESD has been demonstrated, the procedure is associated with a substantial risk of adverse events, including bleeding, perforation, and stricture.

Post-ESD bleeding is the most frequent adverse events and the incidence of post-ESD bleeding in previous studies ranges from 1.8% to 15.6%. Several studies identified that antithrombotic agents and large resection size were strong risk factors for post-ESD bleeding. Moreover, the incidence of bleeding in high-risk patients has been reported to be as high as 61.5%, depending on the definition of high-risk patients. The number of patients at high risk for post-ESD bleeding is increasing worldwide. In addition, as the indications for ESD have been expanding, more patients with large lesions undergo ESD. Therefore, it is important to prevent post-ESD bleeding in high-risk patients.

Although several previous studies have attempted to prevent post-ESD bleeding using surgical material, there is no definite prophylactic treatment to prevent re-bleeding after ESD. To date, coagulation of remnant vessels on the post-resection ulcer surface and administration of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after ESD are practical methods to prevent post-ESD bleeding.

Polysaccharide hemostatic powder (Endo-Clot™) is a new topical hemostatic method recently used for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This study aimed to identify the efficacy of hemostatic powder in preventing post-ESD bleeding in high-risk patients. This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study

* High-risk patients of post-ESD bleeding will be prospectively enrolled in the study. High-risk of post-ESD bleeding is defined as patients with taking antithrombotic agents or with large resection (specimen size ≥ 40mm).
* All ESDs were performed according to the standard procedure sequence in the hemostatic powder group and control group. The Only difference between two groups was hemostatic powder (Endo-clot™) application after standard hemostasis using hemostatic forceps in the hemostatic powder group. For patients in the study group, after hemostasis on the post-resection ulcer using conventional method and removal of specimen, Endo-clot™ (EndoClot Plus, Unc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was applied immediately onto the post-resection surface.
* Bleeding rate of study group within 4 weeks after ESD will be compared with the control group. "

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High-risk Patients for Post-ESD Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All procedures were performed according to the standard procedure sequence in the hemostatic powder group and control group. The Only difference between two groups was hemostatic powder (Endo-clot™) application after standard hemostasis using hemostatic forceps in the hemostatic powder group. For patients in the study group, after hemostasis on the post-resection ulcer using conventional method and removal of specimen, Endo-clot™ (EndoClot Plus, Unc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was applied immediately onto the post-resection surface.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
Randomization immediately after ESD

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hemostatic powder group (Endo-clot™ group)

Patients who will undergo ESD with Endo-clot™ (EndoClot Plus, Unc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) after hemostasis on the post-resection ulcer using conventional method and removal of specimen.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endo-clot™ (EndoClot Plus, Unc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For patients in the study group, after hemostasis on the post-resection ulcer using conventional method and removal of specimen, Endo-clot™ (EndoClot Plus, Unc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was applied immediately onto the post-resection surface.

Hemostatic forceps Only (Coagrasper®, Olympus, Japan) group

For patients in the control group, hemostasis with conventional method (electrical coagulation and/or clip, Coagrasper®, Olympus, Japan) will be done.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hemostatic forceps Only (Coagrasper®, Olympus, Japan) group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All ESDs were performed according to the standard procedure sequence in the hemostatic group and control group except hemostatic powder application.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endo-clot™ (EndoClot Plus, Unc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) group

For patients in the study group, after hemostasis on the post-resection ulcer using conventional method and removal of specimen, Endo-clot™ (EndoClot Plus, Unc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was applied immediately onto the post-resection surface.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hemostatic forceps Only (Coagrasper®, Olympus, Japan) group

All ESDs were performed according to the standard procedure sequence in the hemostatic group and control group except hemostatic powder application.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Endo-clot™ group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older than 19 years old and younger than 85 years old
* Pathologically confirmed gastric adenoma and/or early gastric cancer
* Iatrogenic gastric ulcer after ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection) more than 40mm (at prediction)
* Patients who is taking antithrombotic drug such as aspirin and/or coumadin (and other anti-coagulation medication)
* ECOG performance status 0 or 1
* Adequate renal function (serum creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dL or calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min)
* Adequate liver function (total bilirubin \< 1.5 X the upper limits of normal (ULN), AST and ALT \<3 X UNL, and alkaline phosphatases \< 3 X ULN or \< 5 x ULN in case of liver involvement)
* Adequate BM function (WBC ≥ 3,500/µl, absolute neutrophil cell count ≥ 1,500 /µl, platelet count ≥ 100,000/µl)
* Subjects who given written informed consent after being given a full description of the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Previously treated by radical gastrectomy
* Adverse effect on this medication
* Pregnant or on breast feeding
* Patients who are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent, such as those with psychiatric problem, drug abuse or alcoholism
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Internal Medicine,

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jung DH, Moon HS, Park CH, Park JC. Polysaccharide hemostatic powder to prevent bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in high risk patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2021 Oct;53(10):994-1002. doi: 10.1055/a-1312-9420. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33200808 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2016-1147

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.