Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
112 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-01
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding arising from malignant tumors is increasingly recognized as a result of oncological advances and improved detection methods. However, conventional endoscopic hemostatic methods are not reliable to control bleeding. It has a trend to be an effective hemostasis method for active GI bleeding from tumor, however, in view of the lack of RCTs and large-scale studies, the efficacy of TC-325 is still inconclusive.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of TC325 in endoscopic hemostasis treatment for malignant gastrointestinal hemorrhage.The 24-hour, 72-hour, 30-day, 90-day and 180-day rebleeding rate were assessed as the outcomes of treatment as well as 6-month mortality.
Study design: Single-blinded, multi-center, randomized-control trial study The intervention (experimental) arm: TC-325 alone (define failure if continued bleeding despite application of 1 syringes) The control arm: Standard of (traditional) endoscopic treatments
\*\* Crossover is possible. Inclusion criteria: Patients with acute upper or lower GIB from a lesion that is actively bleeding at index endoscopy (spurting or oozing) and is suspected to be malignant or diagnosed as malignancy from previous tissue diagnosis.
Exclusion criteria: Patients less than 18 years old, previously included in the trial, ECOG score 3 or 4, pregnancy/lactation, and/or bleeding from GI sources suspected of not being malignant. If an endoscopist is unsure of the malignant likelihood of the lesion, he/she will not be enrolled.
Sample size: 112 in total
Duration of participation for each volunteer: 180 days
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TC-325 (HEMOSPRAY™) VS. CURRENT STANDARD OF CARE IN MANAGING MALIGNANT GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING: A PILOT STUDY TO INFORM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
NCT02135627
Hemostatic Powder Versus Clinical Management for the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding From Tumor Lesions
NCT02820077
Prognostic Factors in Malignant GI Bleeding Treated With Hemostatic Powder
NCT03066700
Role of Hemostatic Powder (Endo-clotTM) in Success and Prevention of Bleeding Within Gastric Cancer Patients With Bleeding
NCT02732483
Efficacy of Hemostatic Powder in Preventing Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in High-risk Patients: A Prospective Randomized Control Study
NCT03169569
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TC-325
The intervention (experimental) arm patients are treated initially with TC-325 alone. Treatment failure for TC-325 is defined as endoscopists cannot achieve hemostasis with 1 syringe (20gm) of TC-325.
TC-325
TC-325 compounds of inorganic, non-absorbable powder which acts locally at the mucosal tissue. When spraying the powder on to the blood, it will become a stable barrier sheet because of the effect of clotting factors accumulation and, then the normal healing process can be promoted.
Traditional treatment (Control group)
Control group patients initially receive usual standard of (traditional) endoscopic treatment (SET) as defined by injection therapy with another modality or sole/combination use of thermal or mechanical modalities. Crossovers to either treatment arm are permitted if immediate haemostasis does not achieved with standard endoscopic or TC-325 application.Treatment failure of SET is defined as endoscopists cannot achieve hemostasis by selected SET.
TC-325
TC-325 compounds of inorganic, non-absorbable powder which acts locally at the mucosal tissue. When spraying the powder on to the blood, it will become a stable barrier sheet because of the effect of clotting factors accumulation and, then the normal healing process can be promoted.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TC-325
TC-325 compounds of inorganic, non-absorbable powder which acts locally at the mucosal tissue. When spraying the powder on to the blood, it will become a stable barrier sheet because of the effect of clotting factors accumulation and, then the normal healing process can be promoted.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Endoscopy shows actively bleeding at index endoscopy (spurting or oozing)
* Bleeding from malignancy
Exclusion Criteria
* Previously included in the trial
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 3 or 4
* Pregnancy/lactation
* Bleeding from GI sources suspected of not being malignant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rapat Pittayanon
Principle investigator, Gastrointestinal Unit
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rapat Pittayanon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Bangkok, , Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pittayanon R, Khongka W, Linlawan S, Thungsuk R, Aumkaew S, Teeratorn N, Maytapa J, Kimtrakool S, Pakvisal P, Kongtub N, Rerknimitr R, Barkun A. Hemostatic Powder vs Standard Endoscopic Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor Bleeding: A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2023 Sep;165(3):762-772.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.05.042. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RP014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.