Effectiveness Study of the BioVac Direct Suction Device in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
NCT ID: NCT02150941
Last Updated: 2016-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A new device has been approved by Health Canada that attaches to the endoscope and helps prevent blockage. It is believed that this device will help doctors suck out blood clots and potentially improve visualization, identification of the cause of bleeding, and possibly health outcomes, although this has never been proven. The purpose of the this clinical trial is to test whether the device works and whether it can help patients with this type of bleeding.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a randomized double blind clinical trial of the BioVac suction device versus standard endoscopy suction for UGIB. The study will be performed at London Health Sciences Center Victoria Campus and University Campus with an anticipated recruitment period of 2.5 years.
STUDY POPULATION:
All patients over the age of 18 admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of UGIB will be considered for recruitment. Patients already admitted to hospital with another diagnosis who develop UGIB will also be included.
INTERVENTION:
Patients will undergo EGD for UGIB as per standard clinical practice. If the bleeding source is not found within the first 5 minutes (timer starts once EGD passes upper esophageal sphincter) due to blood clots, the patient may benefit from additional suctioning. The patient will be randomized in blocks of 2-6 stratified by site to either the BioVac device or endoscopy suction. Those randomized to the BioVac device will use it to irrigate and suction as much blood as possible until the bleeding source is found or until the endoscopist feels that additional time would not help. Those randomized to endoscopy suction will do the same without the BioVac device. Due to the suctioning power of the study device, a placebo is not possible. Our original intention was to record the endoscopy video to blindly assess the outcome. Unfortunately, this ended up not being possible for technical reasons.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BioVac Direct Suction Device
Experimental arm
BioVac Direct Suction Device
The BioVac Direct Suction Device (US Endoscopy) is an endoscopic device that enhances the suction power of the gastroscope.
Standard Endoscopy Suction
Control arm
Standard Endoscopy Suction
Standard Endoscopy Suction refers to the suction provided on the gastroscope (Olympus EVIS EXERA III).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BioVac Direct Suction Device
The BioVac Direct Suction Device (US Endoscopy) is an endoscopic device that enhances the suction power of the gastroscope.
Standard Endoscopy Suction
Standard Endoscopy Suction refers to the suction provided on the gastroscope (Olympus EVIS EXERA III).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with hematochezia and hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg) or tachycardia (heart rate \> 110 beats per minute)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age \< 18.
3. No endoscopy was performed.
4. Endoscopy previously performed for current episode of UGIB.
5. Patients unable to consent and who do not have a substitute decision maker.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Sai Lai Sey, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael SL Sey, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
London Health Sciences Centre-Victoria Campus, Western University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
London Health Sciences Center
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
105394
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id