Capsule Endoscopy for HEmorrhage in the ER

NCT ID: NCT03458000

Last Updated: 2023-06-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-17

Study Completion Date

2020-09-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-center randomized controlled trial examining the use of Video Capsule Endoscopy (VCE) to discharge low-moderate risk patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeds (UGIB) from the Emergency Department (ED.) The investigators will enroll 100 subjects at 4 sites who present with signs of hemodynamically stable UGIBs and compare VCE risk assessment to an Active Control (AC) group who receive inpatient upper endoscopy (EGD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) was initially approved in 2001 by the Food and Drug Administration. VCE offers potential advantages over traditional EGD including the ability to be performed 24 hours a day without sedation and interpreted at the bedside by emergency physicians. In addition, VCE is much less invasive, is painless, and enables the patient to pursue normal daily activities after the procedure.

Our primary goal is to test whether ED Video Capsule Endoscopy (VCE) is able to safely discharge low risk patients for outpatient evaluation and management. Our secondary objective is to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of VCE compared to subsequent EGD in the detection of serious bleeding lesions in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Research Coordinator will screen potential patients with signs of upper GI bleeding. Patients who screen as eligible will be approached about potential interest, to review of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and obtain informed consent. Research Coordinator will calculate traditional risk stratification scores and once enrolled, all subjects will be randomized to either Active Control (AC) \[admission plus EGD within hospital stay\] or experimental Capsule Endoscopy Risk Assessment (CERA) in ED. Only patients randomized to the experimental arm will receive video capsule endoscopy in the emergency department.Within 2 hours of presenting to the ED, patient will ingest video capsule-- RC will monitor progress on real-time viewer for passage through pylorus. Upon passing the pylorus, we will record 5 more minutes of video or until battery runs out - whichever occurs first. Patient data will be completed using a standardized data collection tool including the following elements: chief complaint of patient, history of present illness, past medical history, pertinent lab findings, current medications, vital signs, focused physical exam findings and all relevant treatments administered during the ED and hospital stay.

For Active Control (AC) group each patient will be admitted. During hospital admission, EGD will be performed on all subjects and hemostasis therapy applied as necessary. The study team decided against mandating that EGD be performed within 24 hours of hospital admission.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Control

Video Capsule Endoscopy will be administered during ED, but video will not be read until after inpatient EGD. Subject will have hospital admission with an EGD conducted during hospital stay.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard of Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient was admitted to hospital for care and received in-patient EGD.

Experimental

Subject will have Video Capsule Endoscopy read during ED length of stay, disposition will be determined using Capsule Endoscopy Risk Assessment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PillCam UGI

Intervention Type DEVICE

An esophageal capsule endoscope which is designed to visualize the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PillCam UGI

An esophageal capsule endoscope which is designed to visualize the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard of Care

Patient was admitted to hospital for care and received in-patient EGD.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SOC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1\. Individuals aged ≥ 18 years presenting to the Emergency Department with likely upper GI bleed (bloody emesis and/or coffee ground vomiting and/or melena) that has occurred within the previous 48 hours.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Upper GI Bleed with hemodynamic instability (BP\<90 mmHg, pulse\>120 beats per minute, and Hgb \< 9 g/dL)
2. High Risk Upper GI Bleed (Glasgow Blatchford Score\* ≥ 6)
3. Signs, symptoms or history of liver cirrhosis or liver failure
4. Signs, symptoms or history of decompensated heart failure or congestive heart failure
5. Presumed Pregnant, trying to conceive or breastfeeding
6. Known history of gastric cancer
7. Known history of gastric or esophageal varices
8. GI surgery within the last 6 months
9. Prior enrollment in the CHEER Study
10. Prisoner or Ward of State
11. Trouble swallowing, suspected bowel obstruction or perforation, per treating clinician
12. Past UGI tract surgery (e.g., Bilroth I or II, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, bariatric procedure) that changes Gastrointestinal anatomy
13. Known history of gastroparesis, esophageal stricture or Crohn's disease
14. Altered mental status that limits the ability to swallow a capsule
15. Expected to have Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination within 7 days
16. Consumed medications within the past 12 hours that may coat the upper GI tract such as antacids or sucralfate or Maalox and potentially limits capsule visualization
17. Patient either refuses or is unable to get traditional EGD
18. Patient does not have reliable contact information - no phone, no permanent address
19. Patient refuses
20. Unable to provide written consent
21. Non-English speaker
22. Suspected middle or lower GI bleeding
23. Treating ED Physician is not amenable to admission or discharge based on randomization or Video Capsule Endoscopy results. \* As a modification, the GBS Score modified from the traditional GBS score to reduce the Hemoglobin cut-off for 6 points from 10g/dL to 9 g/dL (see Appendix B, CHEER 4; patient screening)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

George Washington University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrew Meltzer

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew Meltzer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

George Washington University- Department of Emergency Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

George Washington University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Duke University School of Medicine

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Temple University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Meltzer AC, Ali MA, Kresiberg RB, Patel G, Smith JP, Pines JM, Fleischer DE. Video capsule endoscopy in the emergency department: a prospective study of acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):438-443.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.008.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23398660 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB #041707

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ISR-2016-10770

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT01371591

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Emergency Capsule Endoscopy in Severe GI-bleeding
NCT01584869 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3