Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Gastrectomy

NCT ID: NCT02216110

Last Updated: 2015-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastrectomy is curative treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been accepted as standard treatment in selected patients with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. However, there are limited data regarding the long-term outcomes of ESD in comparison with surgery. This protocol aims to compare overall survival rate, tumor recurrence, development of metachronous cancers after ESD and surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The prevalence of gastric cancer is high in Asia, especially in Korea and Japan. In Korea, the detection rate of EGC has increased with mass screening for the prevention of gastric cancer-related death. EGC is defined as mucosal or submucosal cancer, regardless of regional lymph node metastasis. The presence of lymph node metastasis has been reported to range from 2% to 18%. For this reason, radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection was considered as the only curative treatment. In EGC patients, surgical outcome demonstrated excellent 5-year survival rate above 90%.

In 2000, EGC subgroups with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis were proposed on the basis of large scale retrospective data. Thereafter, the result was adopted as expanded criteria for endoscopic resection of EGC. ESD is useful technique to dissect the tumor along the submucosal layer using various endoscopic knives. Compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD achieved a higher complete resection rate and a lower local tumor recurrence rate.

Although curative resection is pathologically achieved by ESD, post-resection surveillance is needed to confirm the presence of nodal metastasis. Recently, several studies reported that 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rate were highly favorable in EGC patients who underwent curative ESD. However, there is no comparative study about long-term outcomes after ESD and gastrectomy. Therefore, this protocol aims to evaluate overall survival rate, tumor recurrence, development of metachronous cancers between ESD and surgery groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgery group

Patients who underwent surgery as treatment of early gastric cancer

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery for early gastric cancer includes distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and wedge resection

ESD group

Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as treatment of early gastric cancer, instead of surgery

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery

Surgery for early gastric cancer includes distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and wedge resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* differentiated type mucosal cancer without ulceration, regardless of tumor size
* differentiated type mucosal cancer with ulceration ≤ 3 cm in diameter
* superficial (SM1 \< 500 μm) submucosal cancer ≤ 3 cm in diameter
* undifferentiated type mucosal cancer without ulceration ≤ 2 cm in diameter

Exclusion Criteria

* early gastric cancer in a remnant stomach
* gastrectomy due to metachronous lesions during follow-up period
* post-ESD additional surgery due to high risk of lymph node metastasis or the possibility of residual tumor
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Soonchunhyang University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jun-Hyung Cho

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jun-Hyung Cho, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Soonchunhyang University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCHDDC-2014-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.