Study On Safety Of Endoscopic Resection For 2-5cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

NCT ID: NCT04751591

Last Updated: 2021-11-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

260 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-15

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research is a prospective, multi-center trial for endoscopic resection and laparoscopic partial gastrectomy in patients with 2-5cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the early operative morbidity and mortality and determine the safety of endoscopic resection compared with laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for 2-5cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The second purpose is to evaluate the recovery course and compare the postoperative hospital stay of the patients enrolled in this study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) originate from interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and are the most common tumors derived from mesenchymal tissues of the digestive tract. GISTs can occur in any part of the digestive tract, among which gastric stromal tumors are the most common, accounting for about 60%. The incidence of GIST has been increasing in recent years, partly due to the gradual popularity of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Many early GISTs with smaller tumors have also received early diagnosis and treatment intervention. Due to the potential malignancy of GISTs, complete resection of the tumor is the first and only radical treatment option currently.

Many studies have shown that laparoscopy is safe and effective approach in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors. In principle, as long as the tumor can be completely resected (neither residue macro nor microscopic) with intact tumor capsule and without tumor rupture, laparoscopic surgery is definite an option. Studies showed both short-term and long-term results of laparoscopic surgery were comparable to conventional open surgeries.

On the other hand, endoscopic resection showed promising results in recent years. Endoscopic submucosal dissection endoscopic full-thickness resection are both reported with promising results in terms of safety and short-term efficacy.

Though endoscopic resection has been suggested as one of the treatment options for gastric GISTs, No randomized controlled trial for endoscopic resection versus laparoscopic partial gastrectomy exists at this moment. This research is a prospective, multi-center trial for endoscopic resection and laparoscopic partial gastrectomy in patients with 2-5cm gastric GISTs. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the early operative morbidity and mortality and determine the safety of endoscopic resection compared with laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for 2-5cm gastric GISTs. The second purpose is to evaluate the recovery course and compare the postoperative hospital stay of the patients enrolled in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric GIST

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic resection

The endoscopist will perform endoscopic resection for patients enrolled in this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for patients with 2-5cm gastric GISTs

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy

The endoscopist will perform laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for patients enrolled in this group.

Group Type OTHER

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for patients with 2-5cm gastric GISTs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic resection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for patients with 2-5cm gastric GISTs

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy

Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for patients with 2-5cm gastric GISTs

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients diagnosed with gastric GISTs in imaging examinations including contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic CT, EGD examination and endoscopic ultrasound examination
* The maximum diameter of the tumor is \> 2cm and ≤ 5cm
* No history of upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
* No history of neoadjuvant therapy or targeted therapy
* Preoperative performance status (ECOG,Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) of 0 or 1
* Preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) scoring: I-III
* Sufficient organ functions
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Gastric GISTs with completely extra-luminal growth pattern
* Metastases found in preopreative examinations
* History of simultaneous malignancies or heterochronous malignancies within 5 years
* Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Severe heart and lung disease, severe renal insufficiency, unable to perform laparoscopic surgery
* Body temperature ≥ 38℃ before surgery or infectious disease with a systemic therapy indicated
* Severe mental disease
* Severe respiratory disease
* Severe hepatic and renal dysfunction
* Unstable angina pectoris or history of myocardial infarction within 6 months
* History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months
* Patients with other diseases who can be surgically intervened at the same time
* Continuous systemic steroid therapy within 1 month (except for topical use)
* Patients are participating or have participated in another clinical trial (within 6 months)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pinghong Zhou

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fudan University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tianyin Chen

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +862164041990

Email: [email protected]

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kwon JG, Hwang SJ, Hennig GW, Bayguinov Y, McCann C, Chen H, Rossi F, Besmer P, Sanders KM, Ward SM. Changes in the structure and function of ICC networks in ICC hyperplasia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):630-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.031. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19032955 (View on PubMed)

Heinrich MC, Rubin BP, Longley BJ, Fletcher JA. Biology and genetic aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: KIT activation and cytogenetic alterations. Hum Pathol. 2002 May;33(5):484-95. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.124124.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12094373 (View on PubMed)

Bamboat ZM, Dematteo RP. Updates on the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012 Apr;21(2):301-16. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2011.12.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22365521 (View on PubMed)

Steigen SE, Eide TJ. Trends in incidence and survival of mesenchymal neoplasm of the digestive tract within a defined population of northern Norway. APMIS. 2006 Mar;114(3):192-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2006.apm_261.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16643186 (View on PubMed)

Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Apr;8 Suppl 2(0 2):S1-41; quiz S42-4. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0116.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20457867 (View on PubMed)

Pucci MJ, Berger AC, Lim PW, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL, Palazzo F. Laparoscopic approaches to gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an institutional review of 57 cases. Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3509-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2374-5. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22684977 (View on PubMed)

Ohtani H, Maeda K, Noda E, Nagahara H, Shibutani M, Ohira M, Muguruma K, Tanaka H, Kubo N, Toyokawa T, Sakurai K, Yamashita Y, Yamamoto A, Hirakawa K. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Anticancer Res. 2013 Nov;33(11):5031-41.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24222147 (View on PubMed)

He Z, Sun C, Zheng Z, Yu Q, Wang T, Chen X, Cao H, Liu W, Wang B. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagus and stomach. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Feb;28(2):262-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12056.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23190047 (View on PubMed)

Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Qin XY, Cai MY, Xu MD, Zhong YS, Chen WF, Zhang YQ, Qin WZ, Hu JW, Liu JZ. Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2926-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1644-y. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21424195 (View on PubMed)

Chen T, Zhou PH, Chu Y, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, Ji Y, Yao LQ, Xu MD. Long-term Outcomes of Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors. Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):363-369. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001650.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28059965 (View on PubMed)

ASGE Technology Committee; Aslanian HR, Sethi A, Bhutani MS, Goodman AJ, Krishnan K, Lichtenstein DR, Melson J, Navaneethan U, Pannala R, Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Sullivan SA, Thosani N, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT. ASGE guideline for endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection. VideoGIE. 2019 Jun 29;4(8):343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.03.010. eCollection 2019 Aug.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31388606 (View on PubMed)

Wang C, Gao Z, Shen K, Cao J, Shen Z, Jiang K, Wang S, Ye Y. Safety and efficiency of endoscopic resection versus laparoscopic resection in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;46(4 Pt A):667-674. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.030. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31864827 (View on PubMed)

Wang H, Feng X, Ye S, Wang J, Liang J, Mai S, Lai M, Feng H, Wang G, Zhou Y. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3357-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4612-0. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26497947 (View on PubMed)

Yin X, Yin Y, Chen H, Shen C, Tang S, Cai Z, Zhang B, Chen Z. Comparison Analysis of Three Different Types of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors </=5 cm. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):58-64. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0305. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29083255 (View on PubMed)

Wu CR, Huang LY, Guo J, Zhang B, Cui J, Sun CM, Jiang LX, Wang ZH, Ju AH. Clinical Control Study of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection and Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Gastric Tumors Arising from the Muscularis Propria. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Jun 5;128(11):1455-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.157651.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26021500 (View on PubMed)

Huang LY, Cui J, Wu CR, Zhang B, Jiang LX, Xian XS, Lin SJ, Xu N, Cao XL, Wang ZH. Endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of gastric stromal tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 7;20(25):8253-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8253.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25009400 (View on PubMed)

Chen L, Zhang Q, Li FY, Yang L, Zhang DC, Wang LJ, Wang WZ, Li Z, Xu JH, He ZY, Xu KJ, Chen M, Xu H, Xu ZK. Comparison of treatment outcomes between laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeries for relatively small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;27(4):737-742. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30449501 (View on PubMed)

Zhao Y, Pang T, Zhang B, Wang L, Lv Y, Ling T, Zhang X, Huang Q, Xu G, Zou X. Retrospective Comparison of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Versus Laparoscopic or Surgical Resection of Small (</= 5 cm) Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Dec;24(12):2714-2721. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04493-6. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31823317 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SK2020-032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id