Clinical Impact of Second-look Endoscopy After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplasm

NCT ID: NCT02005809

Last Updated: 2013-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

268 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastroenterologists often follow up second look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) of gastric neoplasms because they want to prevent bleeding of procedure sites. But Goto suggested in his retrospective analysis that a second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm may be unnecessary. So, the investigators try to identify the hypothesis prospectively in this study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Neoplasms

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection gastric neoplasm second look endoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Second look endoscopy

This group is performed second look endoscopy about 24 hours later from endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

second look endoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Second look endoscopy includes observation or prophylactic bleeding control of ESD site.

without second look endoscopy

This group is not performed second look endoscopy after ESD

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

second look endoscopy

Second look endoscopy includes observation or prophylactic bleeding control of ESD site.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* histological confirmed patients(gastric adenoma or adenocarcinoma)
* performed gastric ESD patients about 24 hours before

Exclusion Criteria

* perforation after ESD
* piecemeal resection of ESD specimen
* hemostatic agent or proton pump inhibitor users before ESD
* heparin or antiplatelet agent users
* Serious concurrent infection or nonmalignant illness that is uncontrolled
* Psychiatric disorder that would preclude compliance
* Allergy history to proton pump inhibitor
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Inje University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kosin University Gospel Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Park Moo In

Department of internal medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kosin University Gospel Hospital

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Moo In Park, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 82519905061

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

KiHwan Ku, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Boku N, Ohtu A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S. New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife. Endoscopy. 2001 Mar;33(3):221-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12805.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11293753 (View on PubMed)

Takeshita K, Tani M, Inoue H, Saeki I, Honda T, Kando F, Saito N, Endo M. A new method of endoscopic mucosal resection of neoplastic lesions in the stomach: its technical features and results. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Nov-Dec;44(18):1602-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9427030 (View on PubMed)

Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Ono S, Niimi K, Hirano K, Yamamichi N, Koike K. A second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm may be unnecessary: a retrospective analysis of postendoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.030. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19922919 (View on PubMed)

Tsuji Y, Ohata K, Ito T, Chiba H, Ohya T, Gunji T, Matsuhashi N. Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 21;16(23):2913-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i23.2913.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20556838 (View on PubMed)

Takizawa K, Oda I, Gotoda T, Yokoi C, Matsuda T, Saito Y, Saito D, Ono H. Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection--an analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):179-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995530.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18322872 (View on PubMed)

Kim JW, Kim HS, Park DH, Park YS, Jee MG, Baik SK, Kwon SO, Lee DK. Risk factors for delayed postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage in patients with gastric tumor. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;19(5):409-15. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32801015be.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17413293 (View on PubMed)

Uedo N, Takeuchi Y, Yamada T, Ishihara R, Ogiyama H, Yamamoto S, Kato M, Tatsumi K, Masuda E, Tamai C, Yamamoto S, Higashino K, Iishi H, Tatsuta M. Effect of a proton pump inhibitor or an H2-receptor antagonist on prevention of bleeding from ulcer after endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1610-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01197.x. Epub 2007 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17403076 (View on PubMed)

Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, Kim SJ, Cho JY, Cho WY, Hwangbo Y, Keum BR, Park JJ, Chun HJ, Kim HJ, Kim JJ, Ji SR, Seol SY. Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19249769 (View on PubMed)

Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Kato Y. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer. 2000 Dec;3(4):219-225. doi: 10.1007/pl00011720.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11984739 (View on PubMed)

Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001 Feb;48(2):225-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.48.2.225.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11156645 (View on PubMed)

Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Goto O, Ono S, Muraki Y, Kakushima N, Omata M. Technical feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms with a splash-needle. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Dec;18(6):592-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318187973f.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19098667 (View on PubMed)

Shimatani T, Inoue M, Kuroiwa T, Xu J, Tazuma S, Horikawa Y, Nakamura M. Acid-suppressive efficacy of a reduced dosage of rabeprazole: comparison of 10 mg twice daily rabeprazole with 20 mg twice daily rabeprazole, 30 mg twice daily lansoprazole, and 20 mg twice daily omeprazole by 24-hr intragastric pH-metry. Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Jul;50(7):1202-6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-2760-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16047460 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2nd look EGD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id