Endoscopic Therapy for Laterally Spreading Tumors (LSTs)

NCT ID: NCT06464874

Last Updated: 2024-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

890 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will retrospectively include LST patients who were admitted to 6 medical centers (The Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University; The Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine; First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University; The Second Hospital of Jiaxing; Jinhua People's Hospital; Lanxi People's Hospital) from 2020.05.01 to 2023.04.30 with the purpose of comparing the efficacy and safety of hybrid ESD and ESD in the treatment of colorectal LST. The complete resection rate, operation time, operation cost, intraoperative and postoperative complications of hybrid ESD and ESD LST will be compared. To provide strong evidence for the selection of endoscopic treatment strategies for LST.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Hybrid ESD and ESD in the Treatment of Colorectal LST

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

conventional ESD

Submucosal injection of methylene blue solution at various sites was performed, followed by periphery incision using a dual knife. The submucosal injection was administered multiple times, followed by the utilization of an IT knife for submucosal separation and gradual excision of the lesion. In cases of significant bleeding at the wound site, electrocoagulation hemostatic forceps were employed for hemostasis.

Conventional ESD

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional ESD is the most suitable method for total resection, especially for large lesions. This method can complete the resection of early gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions, while maintaining the integrity of digestive tract anatomy and physiological function.The operation difficulty of this technique is high, the equipment requirements are high, the operation time is long, and the complication rate is closely related to the technical level of the operator.

hybrid ESD

The submucosal injection and circumferential incision of the Hybrid ESD were performed as described above. Subsequently, snaring was conducted post submucosal dissection utilizing a polypectomy snare for complete lesion removal. Careful attention was paid during excision to avoid muscle layer penetration and to control cutting speed in order to mitigate the potential for hemorrhage and perforation. The subsequent steps of the procedure closely followed the conventional ESD methodology outlined previously.

Hybrid ESD

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hybrid ESD is a better choice, but only can remove the lesion in one piece, but also has a lower technical difficulty than conventional ESD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional ESD

Conventional ESD is the most suitable method for total resection, especially for large lesions. This method can complete the resection of early gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions, while maintaining the integrity of digestive tract anatomy and physiological function.The operation difficulty of this technique is high, the equipment requirements are high, the operation time is long, and the complication rate is closely related to the technical level of the operator.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hybrid ESD

Hybrid ESD is a better choice, but only can remove the lesion in one piece, but also has a lower technical difficulty than conventional ESD

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years old;
* LST lesion diameter \>1cm;
* Medical record data integrity

Exclusion Criteria

* Pedicle lesions;
* Resection of residual lesions after endoscopic treatment;
* Advanced endoscopic imaging showed submucosal infiltrating lesions.
* The lesions are in patients with inflammatory bowel disease;
* Familial polyposis;
* Electrolyte abnormalities;
* Coagulation dysfunction;
* Pregnant or lactating patients;
* Taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticoagulants;
* A history of alcoholism;
* Severe organ failure;
* Medical records are incomplete
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-0444

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.