Water-jet Assisted ESD vs Conventional ESD Technique for Treating Early Gastric Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01943253
Last Updated: 2013-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
117 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2012-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. Hypothesis The water-jet assisted ESD technique using the HybridKnife® bears the advantage of less instrument changes due to the combination of high-frequency cutting and water-jet application in one single instrument. This should lead to a simplified ESD procedure, shorter learn-ing curve and especially to a shorter procedure time.
The water-jet assisted ESD technique should be shorter than the conventional ESD techniques using IT2-, Dual- and Hook-Knifes at least with the same safety and effectiveness.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional ESD
Conventional ESD: Conventional ESD technique using IT2-Knife, Dual-Knife, Hook-Knife (Olympus Europe, Hamburg, Germany) ERBE VIO 300D (V2.1.4) RF-surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) Injection of fluid: Syringe
Conventional ESD
Conventional ESD: Conventional ESD technique using IT2-Knife, Dual-Knife, Hook-Knife (Olympus Europe, Hamburg, Germany; Olympus Japan) ERBE VIO 300D (V2.1.4) RF-surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) Injection of fluid: Syringe
Hybridknife ESD
Group 2: Water-jet assisted HybridKnife® ESD technique using HybridKnife® (Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) ERBE VIO 300D (V2.1.4) RF-surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany)
Injection of fluid: Integrated in HybridKnife® with ERBEJet 2 water-jet surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany)
Hybridknife ESD
Group 2: Water-jet assisted HybridKnife® ESD technique using HybridKnife® (Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) ERBE VIO 300D (V2.1.4) RF-surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) Injection of fluid: Integrated in HybridKnife® with ERBEJet 2 water-jet surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional ESD
Conventional ESD: Conventional ESD technique using IT2-Knife, Dual-Knife, Hook-Knife (Olympus Europe, Hamburg, Germany; Olympus Japan) ERBE VIO 300D (V2.1.4) RF-surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) Injection of fluid: Syringe
Hybridknife ESD
Group 2: Water-jet assisted HybridKnife® ESD technique using HybridKnife® (Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) ERBE VIO 300D (V2.1.4) RF-surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) Injection of fluid: Integrated in HybridKnife® with ERBEJet 2 water-jet surgery system (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* differentiated mucosal adenocarinoma without ulcer findings ≤ 60 mm in diameter.
* Lesions with ulceration ≤ 30 mm in diameter.
* undifferentiated type of mucosal cancer is ≤ 20 mm.
* The patient has given written informed consent.
* evidence of local or distant metastases according to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or CT scan, EUS (7.5 MHz probe) findings of tumor infiltration into deep layers of the submucosa or muscularis propria. -Patients unfit for deep sedation by use of propofol
Exclusion Criteria
* coagulopathy (INR\>2.0, platelets \< 70/nl)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
OTHER
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Horst Neuhaus
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Pinghong Zhou
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hybrid ESD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id