Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of Various Endoscopic Examination Techniques

NCT ID: NCT03109938

Last Updated: 2019-08-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

340 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2021-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endoscopic diagnosis of lateral spreading tumours (LST) with submucosal invasion is important in guiding the treatment strategy. The use of advanced imaging is not standard clinical practice in China. A clinical trial is now under way comparing the accuracy of narrow band imaging (NBI), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) for the diagnosis of LST with submucosal invasion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic diagnosis of lateral spreading tumours (LST) with submucosal invasion is important in guiding the treatment strategy. The use of advanced imaging is not standard clinical practice in China. A clinical trial is now under way comparing the accuracy of narrow band imaging (NBI), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) for the diagnosis of LST with submucosal invasion.The final histologic diagnosis was used as the true diagnosis in the present study. By comparing the consistency of histologic diagnosis and preoperative evaluation,the diagnostic accuracies of various endoscopic examination techniques(narrow band imaging , endoscopic ultrasonography , and magnifying chromoendoscopy) was calculated respectively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- patients older than 18 years and Less than 65 years patients with endoscopic diagnosis of lateral spreading tumours signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

\- patients with serious heart, brain, lung, kidney complications patients with intestinal obstruction previous therapy for colorectal cancer women in gestational and lactational period taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet medications. based on the evaluations of physicians, the patient's condition is not suitable for the clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Baoping Wu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology,Department of Gastroenterology

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LST2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.