Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
NCT ID: NCT04232176
Last Updated: 2022-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
545 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-12-22
2022-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computer Assisted Optical Assessment of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02522702
The Real-time Optical Diagnosis Value of Optical Enhancement Endoscopy in Colorectal Sessile Serrated Adenomas/Polyps
NCT03238573
Inspection of the Colon Using a Retrograde Viewing Device for Detection of Colorectal Polyps
NCT04107376
Diagnostic Accuracy of NICE Classification to Predict Deep Submucosal Invasion
NCT02328066
The Accuracy of Human Endoscopic Detection of Submucosal Invasive Cancer in Colorectal Polyps
NCT05191095
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis: Our main purpose is to determine the accuracy of the complete optical diagnosis as made by the endoscopist in the endoscopy room, in order to give recommendations immediately after the colonoscopy, with no need of further histological analyses.
Aims:
* To establish endoscopist accuracy, in different hospital settings, to predict size and histology of polyps between 5 and 15 mm and whether follow-up recommedations based on this diagnosis are accurate enough, when compared to the pathologic diagnosis.
* To evaluate accuracy of the optical size estimation by the endoscopist, with respect to the measurement after resection and by the pathologist (after formaline fixation).
* To analyze the rate of sessile serrated adenoma not diagnosed by the endoscopista on site.
* To determine the proportion of incomplete resection and complications with different resection techniques.
* To follow-up patients with high risk adenoma with the aim to establish the best follow-up schedule for those patients, and clarify this topic, still subjected to uncertainty.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Colorectal polyps with an estimated size (endoscopist estimation) between 5 and 15 mm.
* Consent to be included in the protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
* Polyps that cannot be resected.
* Polys that cannot be sent for pathologic study.
* Peacemeal resection.
* Polyposis syndromes with a previous histologic diagnosis.
* Patients do not consent to participate in the study.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía Oriental
OTHER
University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
EDUARDO REDONDO CEREZO, MD, PhD
Head of Gastroenterology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clara Heredia-Carrasco, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
'Virgen de las Nieves' University Hospital. Granada
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
"Virgen de las Nieves" University Hospital
Granada, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Heitman SJ, Ronksley PE, Hilsden RJ, Manns BJ, Rostom A, Hemmelgarn BR. Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.032. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Mar;4(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2005.12.021.
Mason SE, Poynter L, Takats Z, Darzi A, Kinross JM. Optical Technologies for Endoscopic Real-Time Histologic Assessment of Colorectal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;114(8):1219-1230. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000156.
Rex DK, Kahi C, O'Brien M, Levin TR, Pohl H, Rastogi A, Burgart L, Imperiale T, Ladabaum U, Cohen J, Lieberman DA. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):419-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.023.
Kaminski MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Pohl J, Pellise M, Dekker E, Ignjatovic-Wilson A, Hoffman A, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Heresbach D, Dumonceau JM, East JE. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):435-49. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365348. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
McGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP, Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut. 2013 Dec;62(12):1704-13. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303965. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
IJspeert JE, Bastiaansen BA, van Leerdam ME, Meijer GA, van Eeden S, Sanduleanu S, Schoon EJ, Bisseling TM, Spaander MC, van Lelyveld N, Bargeman M, Wang J, Dekker E; Dutch Workgroup serrAted polypS & Polyposis (WASP). Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut. 2016 Jun;65(6):963-70. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308411. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
Iacucci M, Trovato C, Daperno M, Akinola O, Greenwald D, Gross SA, Hoffman A, Lee J, Lethebe BC, Lowerison M, Nayor J, Neumann H, Rath T, Sanduleanu S, Sharma P, Kiesslich R, Ghosh S, Saltzman JR; SIMPLE classification investigator team. Development and validation of the SIMPLE endoscopic classification of diminutive and small colorectal polyps. Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):779-789. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-100791. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
Izzy M, Virk MA, Saund A, Tejada J, Kargoli F, Anand S. Accuracy of endoscopists' estimate of polyp size: A continuous dilemma. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul 10;7(8):824-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i8.824.
Rees CJ, Rajasekhar PT, Wilson A, Close H, Rutter MD, Saunders BP, East JE, Maier R, Moorghen M, Muhammad U, Hancock H, Jayaprakash A, MacDonald C, Ramadas A, Dhar A, Mason JM. Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study. Gut. 2017 May;66(5):887-895. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310584. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
Redondo-Cerezo E, Heredia-Carrasco C, Alegria-Motte C, Caballero-Mateos A, Vadillo-Calles F, Ortega-Suazo EJ, Martos-Ruiz V, Ariza-Fernandez JL, Lopez-Gonzalez E, Martinez-Cara JG, Valverde-Lopez F, de Hierro ML, Sanchez-Capilla D, Lopez-Hidalgo JL, Jimenez-Rosales R. Accuracy in optical diagnosis for polyps between 5 and 15 mm and its implications on surveillance. A prospective, multicenter study. (POPS study). Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5356-5365. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08917-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
POPS.HUVN.19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.