Endoscopic Surveillance in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia
NCT ID: NCT04906343
Last Updated: 2025-02-18
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
144 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2021-06-05
Study Completion Date
2024-11-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to determine if Serrated Poliposis Syndrome (SPS) patients with SPS criteria, with clearing phase achieved and without any advanced lesion or less than 5 relevant lesions at last colonoscopy have the same advanced neoplasia incidence in the surveillance colonoscopy at 2 or 3 years.
Patients selected for the study will be randomised in two groups for the surveillance: group 1, surveillance with colonoscopy in two years; group 2, surveillance with colonoscopy in three years. Randomization will be done at the database program (RedCAP).
All colonoscopies will be performed with high definition (HD) system and it will be the choice of the endoscopist whether to use chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine o virtual chromoendoscopy. Protocol bowel preparation will be recommended by each centre. Sedation will be prescribed and decided by the endoscopist during the examination.
Data from all the resected and visualized lesions during the colonoscopy will be collected on the database. A pathologist familiarized with serrated lesions will be in charge of the sample analysis. Serrated lesions will be classified attending de WHO criteria for serrated lesions. The investigators define "advanced adenoma" as adenomas ≥10 mm with villous histology and/or with high grade of dysplasia (HGD). The investigators define "advanced SL" as any SL ≥10mm and any SL with dysplasia. The investigators also define "advanced neoplasia" as any colorectal cancer (CRC), any advanced adenoma or advanced Serrated Lesions (SL).
Quality of bowel cleansing will be graded by each endoscopist following the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. This scale evaluates each segment (ascending colon, transverse colon and descending colon) of the following form: 0 = segment of colon whose mucosa cannot be seen due to the existence of solid stools that cannot be eliminated; 1 = mucosa portion of a colonic segment that can be seen, but other areas of the colonic segment are not seen, either due to the presence of dirt, feces or opaque liquid; 2 = existence of small amount of dirt, small fragments of stool and / or opaque liquid, but the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well; 3 = all the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well without residual dirt, small traces of stool or opaque liquid. Patients with inadequate preparation (when in any segment the score is 0 or 1, or the total score is less than 6) will be excluded from the study.
During colonoscopy all complications as post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation or cardio-respiratory events will be registered. Those complications will be considered if surgery or hospital admission is required.
Patients selected for the study will be randomised in two groups for the surveillance: group 1, surveillance with colonoscopy in two years; group 2, surveillance with colonoscopy in three years. Randomization will be done at the database program (RedCAP).
All colonoscopies will be performed with high definition (HD) system and it will be the choice of the endoscopist whether to use chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine o virtual chromoendoscopy. Protocol bowel preparation will be recommended by each centre. Sedation will be prescribed and decided by the endoscopist during the examination.
Data from all the resected and visualized lesions during the colonoscopy will be collected on the database. A pathologist familiarized with serrated lesions will be in charge of the sample analysis. Serrated lesions will be classified attending de WHO criteria for serrated lesions. The investigators define "advanced adenoma" as adenomas ≥10 mm with villous histology and/or with high grade of dysplasia (HGD). The investigators define "advanced SL" as any SL ≥10mm and any SL with dysplasia. The investigators also define "advanced neoplasia" as any colorectal cancer (CRC), any advanced adenoma or advanced Serrated Lesions (SL).
Quality of bowel cleansing will be graded by each endoscopist following the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. This scale evaluates each segment (ascending colon, transverse colon and descending colon) of the following form: 0 = segment of colon whose mucosa cannot be seen due to the existence of solid stools that cannot be eliminated; 1 = mucosa portion of a colonic segment that can be seen, but other areas of the colonic segment are not seen, either due to the presence of dirt, feces or opaque liquid; 2 = existence of small amount of dirt, small fragments of stool and / or opaque liquid, but the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well; 3 = all the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well without residual dirt, small traces of stool or opaque liquid. Patients with inadequate preparation (when in any segment the score is 0 or 1, or the total score is less than 6) will be excluded from the study.
During colonoscopy all complications as post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation or cardio-respiratory events will be registered. Those complications will be considered if surgery or hospital admission is required.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chromoendoscopy for Serrated Polyposis Syndrome
NCT03476434
Colonic Polyp
Colonic Neoplasms
Colonic Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
NCT04232176
Colonic Polyps
Colon Neoplasms
Colon Cancer
+1 more
COMPLETED
Personalized Surveillance Protocol for Serrated Polyposis Syndrome
NCT03450889
Serrated Polyposis Syndrome
Colorectal Cancer
COMPLETED
European Polyp Surveillance Trial
NCT02319928
Colorectal Neoplasms
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
The Value of Polyp Surface Pattern Recognition in the Identification of Neoplasia: a Prospective Study
NCT01182623
Colonic Polyps
COMPLETED
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent neoplasm in developed countries considering both sexes and is the second in terms of cancer mortality. The incidence of the CRC is increasing in all developed countries. Detection of precancerous lesions (colon polyps) or malignant lesions (adenocarcinoma) in early stages in screening programs improves the prognosis and decreases the mortality of these patients. Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is the most common colorectal polyposis syndrome and is characterized by the combination of large and/or numerous serrated lesions (SL) throughout the colorectum. There are three different types of SLs described: hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA).
In 2010 the world health organization (WHO) defined the clinical criteria for the SPS diagnosis: criteria I, any patient with ≥ 5 serrated lesions proximal to the sigma, two of them\> 1 cm in size; criteria II, any first degree relative of a SPS patient with at least one serrated lesion; criteria II, any patient with ≥20 serrated lesions throughout the colon. This criteria were reviewed in 2019 and criteria II was eliminated. The new criteria are: criteria 1, any patient with ≥ 5 SL proximal to the rectum, all ≥5 mm in size, with at least 2 lesions ≥10 mm in size; criteria 2, any patient with \>20 SL of any size distributed throughout the colon, with ≥5 lesions proximal to the rectum.
In recent years, a new pathway in the development of colorectal adenocarcinoma have been described, the "serrated pathway". It is associated with mutations in BRAF and KRAS genes, the existence of hypermethylation in the promoter regions "CpG island" and microsatellite instability phenotype caused by methylation of the MLH-1 gene. This new pathway has a faster progression from the serrated polyp to the CRC in comparison with the classic "adenoma-carcinoma" pathway, hence the importance of detecting and removing these lesions in patients with SPS.
CRC prevalence in patients diagnosed with SPS is 15-35%, according to different studies, and the probability at 5 years of developing a CRC is around 1.3-1.9%. During surveillance, the incidence of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma or advanced serrated lesions) at 3 years is 13% for adenomas and 42 for serrated lesions. Risk factors for developing CRC and advanced neoplasia have been described in several studies. One of these factors is the SPS criteria 2, which has been demonstrated as a low risk of CRC and advanced neoplasia during surveillance of SPS patients. Detecting more than two sessile serrated lesions proximal to the spleenic flexure, one sessile serrated lesion with high grade of dysplasia and the detection of advanced neoplasia in previous colonoscopies, are all risk factors of developing advanced neoplasia during surveillance. A recent multicentre prospective study established SPS patient surveillance according to lesions detected at last colonoscopy. Individuals with at least one advanced adenoma, an advanced serrated lesion or more than 5 relevant lesions (sessile serrated lesions, adenomas of any size or hyperplastic polyps more than 5 mm) were followed at one year. Patients with no lesions mentioned before were followed at 2 years with colonoscopy. Advanced neoplasia incidence in 2 years recommendation surveillance was 15.6% compared with 24.4% in the 1 year recommendation surveillance. CRC cumulative 5 years incidence was 1.3%. Regarding SPS type, the 5 years advanced neoplasia incidence was lower for patients with SPS criteria III of 2010 (26%) than for patients diagnosed with criteria I (53%) or criteria I and III (59%). In this study patients starting their surveillance with clearing phase achieved (clear colon of all polyps ≥5mm and all polyps with the optical aspect of adenoma, TSA or SSL) were at low risk of advanced neoplasia than patients without this phase achieve prior to study inclusion (HR: 0.64; p\<0.047).
With all the above described, the investigators can define a SPS patient with low risk of advanced neoplasia during surveillance: those patients with SPS criteria 2, with clearing phase achieved and without any advanced lesion or less than 5 relevant lesions at last colonoscopy.
The Spanish Society of Gastroenterology (AEG) recommends surveillance with colonoscopies in 1-3 years interval for SPS patient, as it does the European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO). The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends surveillance at 1 o 2 years depending on the last colonoscopy findings, annually in case of any advanced adenoma or serrated lesion or ≥5 relevant lesions (adenomas, SSL or HP≥5mm) were removed, and two surveillance in all other cases. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommends annually surveillance for SPS patients until all serrated lesions ≥ are removed, and then 2 year-surveillance. All these Guidelines mention the limited evidence to support their recommendations and the need for prospective studies to evaluate them. As well many authors have expressed the possibility of extending the surveillance to 3 or even 5 years in low risk patients.
The aim of the study is to determine if SPS patients with SPS criteria 1 or 2, with clearing phase achieved and without any advanced lesion or less than 5 relevant lesions at last colonoscopy have the same advanced neoplasia incidence in the surveillance colonoscopy at 2 or 3 years.
Patients selected for the study will be randomised in two groups for the surveillance: group 1, surveillance with colonoscopy in two years; group 2, surveillance with colonoscopy in three years. Randomization will be done at the database program (RedCAP).
All colonoscopies will be performed with high definition (HD) system and it will be the choice of the endoscopist whether to use chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine o virtual chromoendoscopy. Protocol bowel preparation will be recommended by each centre. Sedation will be prescribed and decided by the endoscopist during the examination.
Data from all the resected and visualized lesions during the colonoscopy will be collected on the database. A pathologist familiarized with serrated lesions will be in charge of the sample analysis. Serrated lesions will be classified attending de WHO criteria for serrated lesions. The investigators define "advanced adenoma" as adenomas ≥10 mm with villous histology and/or with high grade of dysplasia (HGD). The investigators also define "advanced SL" as any SL ≥10mm and any SL with dysplasia. The investigators define "advanced neoplasia" as any CRC, any advanced adenoma or advanced SL.
Quality of bowel cleansing will be graded by each endoscopist following the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. This scale evaluates each segment (ascending colon, transverse colon and descending colon) of the following form: 0 = segment of colon whose mucosa cannot be seen due to the existence of solid stools that cannot be eliminated; 1 = mucosa portion of a colonic segment that can be seen, but other areas of the colonic segment are not seen, either due to the presence of dirt, feces or opaque liquid; 2 = existence of small amount of dirt, small fragments of stool and / or opaque liquid, but the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well; 3 = all the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well without residual dirt, small traces of stool or opaque liquid. Patients with inadequate preparation (when in any segment the score is 0 or 1, or the total score is less than 6) will be excluded from the study.
During colonoscopy all complications as post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation or cardio-respiratory events will be registered. Those complications will be considered if surgery or hospital admission is required.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION This is a randomized controlled study for evaluating a non inferiority strategy in the surveillance of SPS patients, between colonoscopy in 2 years and colonoscopy in 3 years, with the incidence of advanced neoplasia as the principal aim of the study. In the study from the Netherlands, Bleijenberg and col., the incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients at 2 years surveillance was of 15%. The investigators assume an acceptable increase of advanced neoplasia at 3 years surveillance of 25%, so the margin for no inferiority is 10% between the two groups. Accepting the type I error with an unilateral contrast of 0.025, beta risk of 0.2 (power 80% ) and considering a 10% of lost patients, 69 patients in each group (136 in total) are needed to detect significance differences between the two groups.
STUDY VARIABLES:
* Demographic variables: Hospital, identification number (number assigned to each hospital and consecutive number of each patient), date of birth, sex, SPS criteria (according to WHO classification and actualized in 2019: 1 or 2), date of the last colonoscopy, number and type of lesions resected at the last colonoscopy, number of previous colonoscopies, number of polyps removed so far (low risk, high risk and serrated lesions), colon surgery (yes/no) and type of surgery (right colectomy, left colectomy, low anterior resection, segmental colectomy or others), smoker (yes/no/prev).
* Variables of the procedure: date of the procedure, bowel preparation according to BBPS scale 14, study arm (Colonoscopy in2 years/Colonoscopy inn3 years), number and description of lesions resected during the procedure describing its size, shape according to Paris classification15, location of the lesions, distance to the anal margin. Inspection time in each exploration (with stopwatch and without counting the therapeutic moments). Complications during the procedure (bleeding, perforation or cardio-respiratory events).
NECESSARY RESOURCES:
The colonoscopy and polypectomy will be done in the usual clinical care practice.
This protocol does not require additional funding. The explorations will be carried out by the researchers who are staff doctors of the Digestive Endoscopy Units. The effort, the minimum marginal expenses that may lead to the prolongation of the exploration and the collection of data will be assumed by the researchers and the Digestive Endoscopy Units.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This protocol follows the ethical principles of non-malfeasance, beneficence, autonomy and justice included in the Declaration of Helsinki (last update, Seoul 2008) 17, as well as in law 41/2002 on patient autonomy18 and research law 14/2007 biomedical19. The personal and clinical data of the patients will be anonymized.
In 2010 the world health organization (WHO) defined the clinical criteria for the SPS diagnosis: criteria I, any patient with ≥ 5 serrated lesions proximal to the sigma, two of them\> 1 cm in size; criteria II, any first degree relative of a SPS patient with at least one serrated lesion; criteria II, any patient with ≥20 serrated lesions throughout the colon. This criteria were reviewed in 2019 and criteria II was eliminated. The new criteria are: criteria 1, any patient with ≥ 5 SL proximal to the rectum, all ≥5 mm in size, with at least 2 lesions ≥10 mm in size; criteria 2, any patient with \>20 SL of any size distributed throughout the colon, with ≥5 lesions proximal to the rectum.
In recent years, a new pathway in the development of colorectal adenocarcinoma have been described, the "serrated pathway". It is associated with mutations in BRAF and KRAS genes, the existence of hypermethylation in the promoter regions "CpG island" and microsatellite instability phenotype caused by methylation of the MLH-1 gene. This new pathway has a faster progression from the serrated polyp to the CRC in comparison with the classic "adenoma-carcinoma" pathway, hence the importance of detecting and removing these lesions in patients with SPS.
CRC prevalence in patients diagnosed with SPS is 15-35%, according to different studies, and the probability at 5 years of developing a CRC is around 1.3-1.9%. During surveillance, the incidence of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma or advanced serrated lesions) at 3 years is 13% for adenomas and 42 for serrated lesions. Risk factors for developing CRC and advanced neoplasia have been described in several studies. One of these factors is the SPS criteria 2, which has been demonstrated as a low risk of CRC and advanced neoplasia during surveillance of SPS patients. Detecting more than two sessile serrated lesions proximal to the spleenic flexure, one sessile serrated lesion with high grade of dysplasia and the detection of advanced neoplasia in previous colonoscopies, are all risk factors of developing advanced neoplasia during surveillance. A recent multicentre prospective study established SPS patient surveillance according to lesions detected at last colonoscopy. Individuals with at least one advanced adenoma, an advanced serrated lesion or more than 5 relevant lesions (sessile serrated lesions, adenomas of any size or hyperplastic polyps more than 5 mm) were followed at one year. Patients with no lesions mentioned before were followed at 2 years with colonoscopy. Advanced neoplasia incidence in 2 years recommendation surveillance was 15.6% compared with 24.4% in the 1 year recommendation surveillance. CRC cumulative 5 years incidence was 1.3%. Regarding SPS type, the 5 years advanced neoplasia incidence was lower for patients with SPS criteria III of 2010 (26%) than for patients diagnosed with criteria I (53%) or criteria I and III (59%). In this study patients starting their surveillance with clearing phase achieved (clear colon of all polyps ≥5mm and all polyps with the optical aspect of adenoma, TSA or SSL) were at low risk of advanced neoplasia than patients without this phase achieve prior to study inclusion (HR: 0.64; p\<0.047).
With all the above described, the investigators can define a SPS patient with low risk of advanced neoplasia during surveillance: those patients with SPS criteria 2, with clearing phase achieved and without any advanced lesion or less than 5 relevant lesions at last colonoscopy.
The Spanish Society of Gastroenterology (AEG) recommends surveillance with colonoscopies in 1-3 years interval for SPS patient, as it does the European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO). The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends surveillance at 1 o 2 years depending on the last colonoscopy findings, annually in case of any advanced adenoma or serrated lesion or ≥5 relevant lesions (adenomas, SSL or HP≥5mm) were removed, and two surveillance in all other cases. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommends annually surveillance for SPS patients until all serrated lesions ≥ are removed, and then 2 year-surveillance. All these Guidelines mention the limited evidence to support their recommendations and the need for prospective studies to evaluate them. As well many authors have expressed the possibility of extending the surveillance to 3 or even 5 years in low risk patients.
The aim of the study is to determine if SPS patients with SPS criteria 1 or 2, with clearing phase achieved and without any advanced lesion or less than 5 relevant lesions at last colonoscopy have the same advanced neoplasia incidence in the surveillance colonoscopy at 2 or 3 years.
Patients selected for the study will be randomised in two groups for the surveillance: group 1, surveillance with colonoscopy in two years; group 2, surveillance with colonoscopy in three years. Randomization will be done at the database program (RedCAP).
All colonoscopies will be performed with high definition (HD) system and it will be the choice of the endoscopist whether to use chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine o virtual chromoendoscopy. Protocol bowel preparation will be recommended by each centre. Sedation will be prescribed and decided by the endoscopist during the examination.
Data from all the resected and visualized lesions during the colonoscopy will be collected on the database. A pathologist familiarized with serrated lesions will be in charge of the sample analysis. Serrated lesions will be classified attending de WHO criteria for serrated lesions. The investigators define "advanced adenoma" as adenomas ≥10 mm with villous histology and/or with high grade of dysplasia (HGD). The investigators also define "advanced SL" as any SL ≥10mm and any SL with dysplasia. The investigators define "advanced neoplasia" as any CRC, any advanced adenoma or advanced SL.
Quality of bowel cleansing will be graded by each endoscopist following the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. This scale evaluates each segment (ascending colon, transverse colon and descending colon) of the following form: 0 = segment of colon whose mucosa cannot be seen due to the existence of solid stools that cannot be eliminated; 1 = mucosa portion of a colonic segment that can be seen, but other areas of the colonic segment are not seen, either due to the presence of dirt, feces or opaque liquid; 2 = existence of small amount of dirt, small fragments of stool and / or opaque liquid, but the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well; 3 = all the mucosa of the colonic segment can be seen well without residual dirt, small traces of stool or opaque liquid. Patients with inadequate preparation (when in any segment the score is 0 or 1, or the total score is less than 6) will be excluded from the study.
During colonoscopy all complications as post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation or cardio-respiratory events will be registered. Those complications will be considered if surgery or hospital admission is required.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION This is a randomized controlled study for evaluating a non inferiority strategy in the surveillance of SPS patients, between colonoscopy in 2 years and colonoscopy in 3 years, with the incidence of advanced neoplasia as the principal aim of the study. In the study from the Netherlands, Bleijenberg and col., the incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients at 2 years surveillance was of 15%. The investigators assume an acceptable increase of advanced neoplasia at 3 years surveillance of 25%, so the margin for no inferiority is 10% between the two groups. Accepting the type I error with an unilateral contrast of 0.025, beta risk of 0.2 (power 80% ) and considering a 10% of lost patients, 69 patients in each group (136 in total) are needed to detect significance differences between the two groups.
STUDY VARIABLES:
* Demographic variables: Hospital, identification number (number assigned to each hospital and consecutive number of each patient), date of birth, sex, SPS criteria (according to WHO classification and actualized in 2019: 1 or 2), date of the last colonoscopy, number and type of lesions resected at the last colonoscopy, number of previous colonoscopies, number of polyps removed so far (low risk, high risk and serrated lesions), colon surgery (yes/no) and type of surgery (right colectomy, left colectomy, low anterior resection, segmental colectomy or others), smoker (yes/no/prev).
* Variables of the procedure: date of the procedure, bowel preparation according to BBPS scale 14, study arm (Colonoscopy in2 years/Colonoscopy inn3 years), number and description of lesions resected during the procedure describing its size, shape according to Paris classification15, location of the lesions, distance to the anal margin. Inspection time in each exploration (with stopwatch and without counting the therapeutic moments). Complications during the procedure (bleeding, perforation or cardio-respiratory events).
NECESSARY RESOURCES:
The colonoscopy and polypectomy will be done in the usual clinical care practice.
This protocol does not require additional funding. The explorations will be carried out by the researchers who are staff doctors of the Digestive Endoscopy Units. The effort, the minimum marginal expenses that may lead to the prolongation of the exploration and the collection of data will be assumed by the researchers and the Digestive Endoscopy Units.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This protocol follows the ethical principles of non-malfeasance, beneficence, autonomy and justice included in the Declaration of Helsinki (last update, Seoul 2008) 17, as well as in law 41/2002 on patient autonomy18 and research law 14/2007 biomedical19. The personal and clinical data of the patients will be anonymized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Colonic Polyp
Colonic Neoplasms
Colonic Cancer
Serrated Polyposis
Serrated Polyp of Colon
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Patients selected for the study will be randomised in two groups for the surveillance: group 1, surveillance with colonoscopy in two years; group 2, surveillance with colonoscopy in three years.
Primary Study Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 (2 years)
Group 1, surveillance colonoscopy in two years after the last complete colonoscopy in SPS patient.
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Group 2 (3 years)
Group 2, surveillance colonoscopy in three years after the last complete colonoscopy in SPS patient.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Colonoscopy
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Colonoscopy surveillance in SPS patient after 3 years of the last colonoscopy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy surveillance in SPS patient after 3 years of the last colonoscopy.
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients aged 18 years or older that fulfil WHO criteria 1 or 2 of SPS:
* Criteria 1: any patient with ≥ 5 SL proximal to the rectum, all ≥5 mm in size, with at least 2 ≥10 mm in size.
* Criteria 2: any patient with \>20 SL of any size distributed throughout the colon, with ≥5 lesions proximal to the rectum.
* Patients with a previous complete colonoscopy with adequate bowel preparation and with all lesions \>5mm been resected ("clearance colonoscopy), after the diagnostic of SPS.
* Nor advanced adenoma or serrated lesions at prior colonoscopy, and also either more than 5 relevant lesion (adenoma, SSL or PH\>5mm) at prior colonoscopy.
* Criteria 1: any patient with ≥ 5 SL proximal to the rectum, all ≥5 mm in size, with at least 2 ≥10 mm in size.
* Criteria 2: any patient with \>20 SL of any size distributed throughout the colon, with ≥5 lesions proximal to the rectum.
* Patients with a previous complete colonoscopy with adequate bowel preparation and with all lesions \>5mm been resected ("clearance colonoscopy), after the diagnostic of SPS.
* Nor advanced adenoma or serrated lesions at prior colonoscopy, and also either more than 5 relevant lesion (adenoma, SSL or PH\>5mm) at prior colonoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with no inform consent or who do not agree to participate in the study.
* Patients with total or partial colectomy.
* Patients with other CCR predisposing syndromes with germinal mutation (Familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jehgers syndrome, Cowden syndrome, Juvenile polyposis syndrome…).
* Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
* Patients with coagulation disorders.
* Fragmented lesion or submucosal invasive lesion at last colonoscopy.
* Inadequate colon preparation: any segment of the colon with \<2 points in Boston Scale (BBPS).
* Patients with total or partial colectomy.
* Patients with other CCR predisposing syndromes with germinal mutation (Familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jehgers syndrome, Cowden syndrome, Juvenile polyposis syndrome…).
* Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
* Patients with coagulation disorders.
* Fragmented lesion or submucosal invasive lesion at last colonoscopy.
* Inadequate colon preparation: any segment of the colon with \<2 points in Boston Scale (BBPS).
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
90 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitario de Móstoles
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jorge Lopez Vicente
Principal Investigator
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jorge López Vicente
Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Spain
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Group; von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N, Atkin W, Halloran S, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Malila N, Minozzi S, Moss S, Quirke P, Steele RJ, Vieth M, Aabakken L, Altenhofen L, Ancelle-Park R, Antoljak N, Anttila A, Armaroli P, Arrossi S, Austoker J, Banzi R, Bellisario C, Blom J, Brenner H, Bretthauer M, Camargo Cancela M, Costamagna G, Cuzick J, Dai M, Daniel J, Dekker E, Delicata N, Ducarroz S, Erfkamp H, Espinas JA, Faivre J, Faulds Wood L, Flugelman A, Frkovic-Grazio S, Geller B, Giordano L, Grazzini G, Green J, Hamashima C, Herrmann C, Hewitson P, Hoff G, Holten I, Jover R, Kaminski MF, Kuipers EJ, Kurtinaitis J, Lambert R, Launoy G, Lee W, Leicester R, Leja M, Lieberman D, Lignini T, Lucas E, Lynge E, Madai S, Marinho J, Maucec Zakotnik J, Minoli G, Monk C, Morais A, Muwonge R, Nadel M, Neamtiu L, Peris Tuser M, Pignone M, Pox C, Primic-Zakelj M, Psaila J, Rabeneck L, Ransohoff D, Rasmussen M, Regula J, Ren J, Rennert G, Rey J, Riddell RH, Risio M, Rodrigues V, Saito H, Sauvaget C, Scharpantgen A, Schmiegel W, Senore C, Siddiqi M, Sighoko D, Smith R, Smith S, Suchanek S, Suonio E, Tong W, Tornberg S, Van Cutsem E, Vignatelli L, Villain P, Voti L, Watanabe H, Watson J, Winawer S, Young G, Zaksas V, Zappa M, Valori R. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):51-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325997. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Monahan KJ, Bradshaw N, Dolwani S, Desouza B, Dunlop MG, East JE, Ilyas M, Kaur A, Lalloo F, Latchford A, Rutter MD, Tomlinson I, Thomas HJW, Hill J; Hereditary CRC guidelines eDelphi consensus group. Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG). Gut. 2020 Mar;69(3):411-444. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319915. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
East JE, Atkin WS, Bateman AC, Clark SK, Dolwani S, Ket SN, Leedham SJ, Phull PS, Rutter MD, Shepherd NA, Tomlinson I, Rees CJ. British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum. Gut. 2017 Jul;66(7):1181-1196. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314005. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bleijenberg AG, IJspeert JE, van Herwaarden YJ, Carballal S, Pellise M, Jung G, Bisseling TM, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, van Lelyveld N, Bessa X, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Bastiaansen B, de Klaver W, Rivero L, Spaander MC, Koornstra JJ, Bujanda L, Balaguer F, Dekker E. Personalised surveillance for serrated polyposis syndrome: results from a prospective 5-year international cohort study. Gut. 2020 Jan;69(1):112-121. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318134. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rodriguez-Alcalde D, Castillo-Lopez G, Lopez-Vicente J, Hernandez L, Lumbreras-Cabrera M, Moreno-Sanchez D. Long-Term Incidence of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: Experience in a Single Academic Centre. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 3;13(5):1066. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051066.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bleijenberg AGC, IJspeert JEG, Rodriguez-Alcalde D, Carballal S, Visser MR, Pellise M, Koornstra JJ, Rana SA, Latchford A, Balaguer F, Dekker E. The (ir)relevance of the abandoned criterion II for the diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Fam Cancer. 2020 Apr;19(2):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s10689-019-00156-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bleijenberg AGC, IJspeert JEG, Carballal S, Pellise M, Jung G, van Herwaarden YJ, Bisseling TM, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, van Lelyveld N, Bessa X, Rodriguez-Alcalde D, Bastiaansen BAJ, de Klaver W, Bemelman WA, Bujanda L, Koornstra JJ, Rivero L, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Balaguer F, Dekker E. Low Incidence of Advanced Neoplasia in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome After (Sub)total Colectomy: Results of a 5-Year International Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;114(9):1512-1519. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000339.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rodriguez-Alcalde D, Carballal S, Moreira L, Hernandez L, Rodriguez-Alonso L, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Gonzalo V, Bujanda L, Bessa X, Poves C, Cubiella J, Castro I, Gonzalez M, Moya E, Oquinena S, Clofent J, Quintero E, Esteban P, Pinol V, Fernandez FJ, Jover R, Cid L, Saperas E, Lopez-Ceron M, Cuatrecasas M, Lopez-Vicente J, Rivero-Sanchez L, Jung G, Vila-Casadesus M, Sanchez A, Castells A, Pellise M, Balaguer F; Gastrointestinal Oncology Group of the Spanish Gastroenterological Association. High incidence of advanced colorectal neoplasia during endoscopic surveillance in serrated polyposis syndrome. Endoscopy. 2019 Feb;51(2):142-151. doi: 10.1055/a-0656-5557. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HUMostoles2021005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Endocuff for Surveillance of Serrated Polyposis Syndrome
NCT02592603
COMPLETED
NA
Risk of Metachronous Findings After Detection of Serrated Lesions and High-grade Dysplasia With Surveillance Delay
NCT05355363
RECRUITING
NA
The Accuracy of Human Endoscopic Detection of Submucosal Invasive Cancer in Colorectal Polyps
NCT05191095
COMPLETED
Diagnostic Accuracy of NICE Classification to Predict Deep Submucosal Invasion
NCT02328066
COMPLETED
NA
Clinical and Endoscopic Characterization of Patients With Multiple Colorectal Adenomas: A Multicenter Study in Spain (ESPAPOLYP Study)
NCT06625788
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection
NCT03050333
UNKNOWN
Surveillance Intervals After Piecemeal Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions ≥20mm
NCT06791616
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection or Conventional Polypectomy
NCT01950117
COMPLETED
NA
Underwater EMR vs. Conventional EMR for Large Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyp
NCT03567746
UNKNOWN
NA
Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT06271941
RECRUITING
NA
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Versus Standard Therapy of the Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT03868605
UNKNOWN
NA
Full Spectrum vs. Standard Forward-viewing Colonoscopy
NCT02117674
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of MORbidity of Submucosal DIssection Resection of Giant cOlon Lesions Versus Surgery: a National Multicenter Study (MORDIGO)
NCT06371898
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Predictors of Unsuccessful Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Complex Colon Polyps
NCT02782793
COMPLETED
Colorectal Polyp Resection Adequacy
NCT02217085
COMPLETED
Artificial Intelligence for Leaving in Situ Colorectal Polyps.
NCT05500248
COMPLETED
NA
Prospective Study on Polypectomy Complications: SPoC.
NCT02007395
COMPLETED
Prospective Study of Colon Serrated Polyps
NCT02332785
RECRUITING
Delayed Surveillance Colonoscopy Following Piecemeal EMR
NCT07328308
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Piecemeal Versus En Bloc Resection of Large Rectal Adenomas
NCT02238938
TERMINATED
NA
Backwards Examination of the Right Colon: A Back-to-back Study
NCT02838186
COMPLETED
NA
Efficacy and Safety of a Solution for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Lesions
NCT06910514
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Follow-up Protocol of Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Scars
NCT04239365
COMPLETED
NA
Panoramic Screening by Complete Colonoscopy in the Management of Colorectal Adenomas
NCT03961893
COMPLETED
NA