Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-31
2030-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. The safety of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for the removal of colorectal polyps
2. The efficacy and feasibility of PFA in the treatment of colorectal polyps using metrics such as treatment coverage, treatment time, post treatment fibrosis, post treatment recurrence and patient satisfaction
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
UEMR for Medium-sized Pedunculated Colon Polyps
NCT04837690
Submucosal Injection EMR vs. Underwater EMR for Colorectal Polyps
NCT01712048
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147
Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02484079
Colorectal Polyp Resection Adequacy
NCT02217085
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Endoscopic ablation with electroporation offers the potential of treating colorectal polyps in an easier, faster and less invasive manner. Electroporation uses small, high frequency, electric pulses, applied on the surface of tissues to temporarily open up pores in the outer wall of these cells. These pores, disrupts the structure of the abnormal cells and cause cell death via apoptosis. This approach has been used to treat frail patients with advanced colored cancer who cannot undergo more aggressive forms of treatment and it is postulated that this technology also has the ability to deal with colorectal polyps. This study is a pilot research involving a small number of patients with colorectal polyps who will be treated with electroporation given during colonoscopy.
Patients who participate in this study will be treated using endoscopic electroporation with the intent of ablating NICE (Narrow Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic classification) Type 1 or Type 2 colorectal polyps. The treatment will typically be carried out under sedation. Small risks for this procedure include complications such as bleeding, intestinal perforation, infection and an adverse reaction to the anaesthetic medication. Patients who have been treated with electroporation have also reported the following symptoms following treatment: pyrexia, obstipation, diarrhea, pyrexia, nausea, headaches, and joint pain. Patients will be required to return for the first follow-up visit, approximately 6 weeks after the initial treatment, at which time they will need to have a colonoscopy. If there is evidence that the initial treatment has not removed 100% of the polyp, an additional treatment will be offered, or the polyp will be removed by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) which is the standard treatment for this indication. This decision will be taken by the patient's primary physician. Patients who have an additional treatment will return approximately 12 weeks after the initial treatment for another colonoscopy that falls outside of standard of care protocol. All other visits fall under the standard care timelines. Patients who have successfully been treated with endoscopic ablation will undergo a biopsy at either the first, or second follow up visit to exclude residual disease. This will be performed when the patient is under sedation
Clinical review and colonoscopy will be repeated at 6weeks, 6months and 5years from initial contact to assess the effectiveness on the polyp and the safety of the patient
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pulsed Field Ablation group
The EndoVE (Endoscopic vacuum electrode) is moved endoscopically into surface contact with the polyp. A vacuum is employed through the EndoVE as required to assist contact with the device. An electrical field depth of 8-10mm and surface area of 2cm3 is treated per pulse application. The electrical pulses are produced by an electroporation generator (ePORE device). Larger polyps will require multiple applications to ensure the full surface area has been treated. An overlap with previously pulsed areas is preferable to ensure all of the polyp tissue is ablated. The patient will then be transferred to the step-down ward to monitor for any adverse events before being discharged on the same day. The patient will be requested to attend the clinic for an endoscopy follow up at 4-6 weeks post EndoVE polyp treatment to investigate the response.
Irreversible Electroporation using EndoVE(Endoscopic Vacuum Electrode) and electrical pulses generated using ePORE(electroporation device)
The use of pulsed field ablation via irreversible electroporation delivered during flexible lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Irreversible Electroporation using EndoVE(Endoscopic Vacuum Electrode) and electrical pulses generated using ePORE(electroporation device)
The use of pulsed field ablation via irreversible electroporation delivered during flexible lower gastrointestinal endoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to review the consent form prior to enrolment into the study • Patients must be mentally capable of understanding the information given • Patients must give written informed consent prior to undergoing any study-specific procedures.
* Patients must have at least one polyp (treatment naive, recurrent or residual) measuring \>5mm, located distal to the splenic flexure(i.e descending colon, Sigmoid colon, recto sigmoid junction and the rectum above the dentate line)
* Polyp(s) must be classified as Type 1 or Type 2, based on NICE (Narrow Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic) classification; OR Type 1 or Type 2A based on JNET (Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team) classification
* Patients must have a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status ≤ 2 . Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are incapacitated, unconscious or from a vulnerable population. • Patient who is pregnant or breastfeeding
* Patients unable to provide their own informed consent
* Patients with complex / challenging polyp(s), including but not limited to those that are: o \>20mm in size o Flat/bulky in shape o Extending beyond 2 haustra folds or occupying more than 1/3rd of the lumenal circumference o Located on the right colon proximal to the splenic flexure, ileocecal valve, hepatic and splenic flexure or dentate line of the rectum o Fibrosis from large lateral spreading lesions
* Patients with NICE Type 3 category polyps, OR JNET Type 2B or Type 3 polyps
* Patients with British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) category C (high risk polyps).
* Five or more polyps in a single patient
* Grossly inflamed colonic mucosa with bleeding or ulcers
* Implanted colonic stents
* Polyposis syndromes
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mirai Medical
INDUSTRY
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRAS 337105
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.