Prospective Comparison of Cold Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents
NCT ID: NCT01553565
Last Updated: 2014-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate postpolypectomy bleeding and the complete retrieval rate after the removal by colon snare transection without electrocautery for small polyps in patients who are taking antithrombotic agents.
3. Design: A prospective, consecutive study.
4. Setting: Municipal hospital outpatients.
5. Interventions: Polypectomy by cold snare technique (Cold polypectomy) was performed for colorectal polyps up to 10 mm in diameter in patients who continue to take antithrombotic agents. The primary outcome measure was bleeding within two weeks after polypectomy. Secondary outcome measure was the complete retrieval rate of colorectal polyps based on the pathological examination.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT00763425
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650
Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT03373136
The Effectiveness of an Exclusive Cold Snare Polypectomy Snare for the Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02036047
Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection or Conventional Polypectomy
NCT01950117
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional polypectomy
All colorectal polyps up to 10 mm found except for tiny hyperplastic polyps in the rectum and distal sigmoid colon are removed with electrocautery. Submucosal injection of some solution before the removal are not performed.
Cold polypectomy
All colorectal polyps up to 10 mm found except for tiny hyperplastic polyps in the rectum and distal sigmoid colon are removed. The technique is cold resection of the polyp without tenting and then suction of the transected polyp into a trap followed by submission to histopathological evaluation.
Cold polypectomy
Cold polypectomy
All colorectal polyps up to 10 mm found except for tiny hyperplastic polyps in the rectum and distal sigmoid colon are removed. The technique is cold resection of the polyp without tenting and then suction of the transected polyp into a trap followed by submission to histopathological evaluation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cold polypectomy
All colorectal polyps up to 10 mm found except for tiny hyperplastic polyps in the rectum and distal sigmoid colon are removed. The technique is cold resection of the polyp without tenting and then suction of the transected polyp into a trap followed by submission to histopathological evaluation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnant,
* American Society of Anesthesiologists class III and IV,
* overweight (body weight \> 100 kg), or
* allergic to propofol used or its components (soybeans or eggs),
* with previous colorectal surgical resection.
20 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Showa Inan General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Akira Horiuchi
Chief, Digestive Disease Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Akira Horiuchi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Showa Inan General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Showa Inan General Hospital
Komagane, Nagano, Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
cold vs.hot
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.