Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Non-thermal Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT ID: NCT07242820
Last Updated: 2025-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
752 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-31
2032-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that adding adjuvant thermal ablation to non-thermal EMR (vs no ablation) will result in lower lesion recurrence rates at 6-month follow-up, and non-inferior adverse events (AE) rates 14 days post EMR.
For participants with planned EMR, endoscopists will perform non-thermal EMRs as per standard of care and:
* adjuvant thermal ablation will either not be performed (control group), or will be applied to the base and outside margins of the resection site (experimental group);
* then, all patients will be contacted 14-44 days after EMR, to verbally ascertain the occurrence of AEs;
* then, all patients will undergo a first follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months after initial conoloscopy to assess lesion recurrence;
* finally, all patients will undergo a second and final colonoscopy 18 months after EMR.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Complete Closure After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06807073
Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT06271941
Does Routine Submucosal Injection Improve Complete Resection of 4-20 mm Neoplastic Colorectal Polyps?
NCT04548947
Soft Coagulation for the Prevention of Adenoma Recurrence
NCT01789749
Recurrences After Standard EMR vs Plus Thermal Ablation EMR
NCT05121805
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All participating endoscopists will view dedicated teaching videos of the standard thermal ablation technique and key technical details to ensure consistent study procedures. Patients with planned EMR procedures will be invited by a research assistant before the EMR to participate in the study. Patients will be randomized to control or experimental groups in a 1:1 ratio using a central REDCap randomization module after the EMR resection phase is completed and immediately before adjuvant thermal ablation (intervention). This will limit bias by ensuring that the EMR technique is not affected by group allocation. When 2 or more lesions are present in a patient, the largest lesion will be chosen for inclusion in the study and all lesions will be photodocumented for auditing purposes.
No ablation (control group): Non-thermal EMR will be performed as per standard of care with submucosal injection and non-electrocautery resection of all visually visible polyp tissue using a snare. When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, no adjuvant thermal ablation of the post-EMR defect will be performed. Defect closure using clips will be performed only if there is concern for injury to the muscle layer or signs of overt perforation. A tattoo will be placed 3 cm distal to the resected lesion to allow for better identification of the resection site for follow-up. If multiple large polyps are found and removed, the largest lesion (study polyp) will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distally and 3 cm proximally, to clearly identify the study polyp resection site.
Adjuvant thermal ablation (experimental group): Non-thermal EMR will be performed as per standard of care with submucosal injection and non-electrocautery resection of all visually visible polyp tissue using a snare. When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, submucosal injection (0.9% NaCl with methylene blue solution) using the h-APC probe (ERBEJET 2 attached to Vio3 electrosurgical unit, pressure: 40 bar) will be performed to further expose the resection margin. Adjuvant thermal ablation will be applied to the outside margins of the resection site using the h-APC probe. Then, adjuvant thermal ablation will also be applied to the base of the resection site using the h-APC probe. The precise electrocautery mode (PRECISE-APC setting 9) will be used to apply thermal ablation, as previously described for h-APC. Defect closure using clips will be performed only if there is concern for injury to the muscle layer or signs of overt perforation. A tattoo will be placed in the same way as described in the control group and, again, if multiple large polyps are found and removed, the largest lesion (study polyp) will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distally and 3 cm proximally, to clearly identify the study polyp resection site.
At 6 months after initial colonoscopy, patients will undergo a first follow-up colonoscopy, as suggested by current guidelines and from studies showing that most recurrences occurred within the first 6 months. A window of 3 to 13 months will be permitted for the first follow-up. If recurrence is detected, patients will undergo subsequent colonoscopies at shortened intervals, as determined by the treating endoscopist, until no recurrence is detected. If surgery is performed due to difficulty in treating recurrence, patients will undergo a follow-up colonoscopy 6 months after surgery to detect any possible recurrence. All patients will undergo a second and final study colonoscopy 18 months after randomization, which will also mark the end of study follow-up. The second follow-up may be conducted within a window of 14 to 24 months. Subsequent colonoscopies will then be recommended outside the study as per routine care for such a clinical situation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) + adjuvant thermal ablation
Adjuvant thermal ablation will be applied to the base and outside margins of the resection site after non-thermal EMR.
Adjuvant thermal ablation
When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, submucosal injection (0.9% NaCl with methylene blue solution) using the h-APC probe (ERBEJET 2 attached to Vio3 electrosurgical unit, pressure: 40 bar) will be performed to further expose the resection margin. Adjuvant thermal ablation will be applied to the outside margins of the resection site using the h-APC probe.
Adjuvant thermal ablation will then also be applied to the base of the resection site using the h-APC probe. The precise electrocautery mode (PRECISE-APC setting 9) will be used to apply thermal ablation, as previously described for h-APC.
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
After non-thermal EMR, no adjuvant thermal ablation will be performed.
No adjuvant thermal ablation
After performing non-thermal EMR with thermal ablation, adjuvant thermal ablation will not be performed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Adjuvant thermal ablation
When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, submucosal injection (0.9% NaCl with methylene blue solution) using the h-APC probe (ERBEJET 2 attached to Vio3 electrosurgical unit, pressure: 40 bar) will be performed to further expose the resection margin. Adjuvant thermal ablation will be applied to the outside margins of the resection site using the h-APC probe.
Adjuvant thermal ablation will then also be applied to the base of the resection site using the h-APC probe. The precise electrocautery mode (PRECISE-APC setting 9) will be used to apply thermal ablation, as previously described for h-APC.
No adjuvant thermal ablation
After performing non-thermal EMR with thermal ablation, adjuvant thermal ablation will not be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing EMR for large (≥20 mm) colorectal LSL
* Providing written and informed consent for study participation
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-elective colonoscopy
* Poor general health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification \>III)
* Coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia (international normalized ration ≥1.5 or platelets \<50\*10\^9/L)
* Bulky lesions (granular mixed with ≥10mm module).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2026-13165
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.