Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-10
2017-06-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion and Dexmedetomidine Bolus Administration for Smooth Emergence From General Sevoflurane Anesthesia
NCT01617694
The Effect of Desflurane vs Sevoflurane on Perioperative Respiratory Complications in Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia
NCT03006250
Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Blunting Hemodynamic Responses to Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation
NCT02001285
Comparison of PRS According to Inhalation Agent During LDLT
NCT01886664
Influence of Sevoflurane and Desflurane on Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT03259672
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Kidney transplantation is conducted under general anesthesia. Interestingly, several agents used in general anesthesia have also modulated immune functions (4-12). Although the effect of inhalation anesthetic agents on leukocyte count has been shown, the effect on Treg function has totally been unknown. Knowing the effects of inhalation agents on Treg numbers and functions will be beneficial to intraoperative management during transplant surgery, aiming toward reducing the risk of graft rejection in the future.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sevoflurane
In sevoflurane arm (n=20) at the beginning after successful intubation, 2 L/min nitric oxide (N2O), 2 L/min O2 , and 2% to 2.5% sevoflurane will be given for 10 minutes then total flow will be decreased to 2 L/min. Anesthesia will be maintained using 1-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in 50% O2 and 50% N2O.
Sevoflurane
After induction of anesthesia and successful intubation, 2 L/min N2O, 2 L/min O2 , and 2% to 2.5% sevoflurane will be given for 10 minutes then total flow will be decreased to 2 L/min. Anesthesia will be maintained using 1-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in 50% O2 and 50% N2O. Ventilation will be adjusted to keep end-tidal carbon dioxide 30-35 mmHg (Tidal volume 7-10 mL/kg).
Desflurane
In desflurane arm (n=20) at the beginning after successful intubation, 2 L/min N2O, 2 L/min O2, and 6% to 8% desflurane will be given for 10 minutes then total flow will be decreased to 2 L/min. Anesthesia will be maintained using 1-1.5 MAC of desflurane in 50% O2 and 50% N2O.
Desflurane
After induction of anesthesia and successful intubation, 2 L/min N2O, 2 L/min O2 , and 6% to 8% desflurane will be given for 10 minutes then total flow will be decreased to 2 L/min. Anesthesia will be maintained using 1-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane in 50% O2 and 50% N2O. Ventilation will be adjusted to keep end-tidal carbon dioxide 30-35 mmHg (Tidal volume 7-10 mL/kg).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sevoflurane
After induction of anesthesia and successful intubation, 2 L/min N2O, 2 L/min O2 , and 2% to 2.5% sevoflurane will be given for 10 minutes then total flow will be decreased to 2 L/min. Anesthesia will be maintained using 1-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in 50% O2 and 50% N2O. Ventilation will be adjusted to keep end-tidal carbon dioxide 30-35 mmHg (Tidal volume 7-10 mL/kg).
Desflurane
After induction of anesthesia and successful intubation, 2 L/min N2O, 2 L/min O2 , and 6% to 8% desflurane will be given for 10 minutes then total flow will be decreased to 2 L/min. Anesthesia will be maintained using 1-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane in 50% O2 and 50% N2O. Ventilation will be adjusted to keep end-tidal carbon dioxide 30-35 mmHg (Tidal volume 7-10 mL/kg).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pre-existing autoimmune or immunodeficiency diseases in recipients
* Receiving blood product during 24-h perioperative period
* Patient refuse to participate this study at any time point
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arpa Chutipongtanate
Faculty Member
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arpa Chutipongtanate, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ramathibodi Hospital
Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Edozie FC, Nova-Lamperti EA, Povoleri GA, Scotta C, John S, Lombardi G, Afzali B. Regulatory T-cell therapy in the induction of transplant tolerance: the issue of subpopulations. Transplantation. 2014 Aug 27;98(4):370-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000243.
San Segundo D, Millan O, Munoz-Cacho P, Boix F, Paz-Artal E, Talayero P, Morales JM, Muro M, De Cos MA, Guirado L, Llorente S, Pascual J, Arias M, Brunet M, Lopez-Hoyos M. High proportion of pretransplantation activated regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25highCD62L+CD45RO+) predicts acute rejection in kidney transplantation: results of a multicenter study. Transplantation. 2014 Dec 15;98(11):1213-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000202.
Lopez-Hoyos M, Segundo DS, Fernandez-Fresnedo G, Marin MJ, Gonzalez-Martin V, Arias M. Regulatory T cells in renal transplantation and modulation by immunosuppression. Transplantation. 2009 Aug 15;88(3 Suppl):S31-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181af7b99.
Zhang T, Fan Y, Liu K, Wang Y. Effects of different general anaesthetic techniques on immune responses in patients undergoing surgery for tongue cancer. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Mar;42(2):220-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200209.
Schneemilch CE, Hachenberg T, Ansorge S, Ittenson A, Bank U. Effects of different anaesthetic agents on immune cell function in vitro. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Aug;22(8):616-23. doi: 10.1017/s0265021505001031.
Ji FH, Wang YL, Yang JP. Effects of propofol anesthesia and sevoflurane anesthesia on the differentiation of human T-helper cells during surgery. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Feb;124(4):525-9.
Pirbudak Cocelli L, Ugur MG, Karadasli H. Comparison of effects of low-flow sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia on neutrophil and T-cell populations. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2012 Feb;73(1-2):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2012.02.005.
Loop T, Dovi-Akue D, Frick M, Roesslein M, Egger L, Humar M, Hoetzel A, Schmidt R, Borner C, Pahl HL, Geiger KK, Pannen BH. Volatile anesthetics induce caspase-dependent, mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in human T lymphocytes in vitro. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jun;102(6):1147-57. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200506000-00014.
Hisano T, Namba T, Hashiguchi-Ikeda M, Ito T, Hirota K, Fukuda K. Inhibition of E-selectin-mediated leukocyte adhesion by volatile anesthetics in a static condition. J Anesth. 2005;19(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00540-004-0274-0.
Koksoy S, Sahin Z, Karsli B. Comparison of the effects of desflurane and bupivacaine on Th1 and Th2 responses. Clin Lab. 2013;59(11-12):1215-20. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.120413.
Kim WH, Jin HS, Ko JS, Hahm TS, Lee SM, Cho HS, Kim MH. The effect of anesthetic techniques on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011 Sep;49(3):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
Zhou D, Gu FM, Gao Q, Li QL, Zhou J, Miao CH. Effects of anesthetic methods on preserving anti-tumor T-helper polarization following hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 28;18(24):3089-98. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3089.
Chutipongtanate A, Prukviwat S, Pongsakul N, Srisala S, Kamanee N, Arpornsujaritkun N, Gesprasert G, Apiwattanakul N, Hongeng S, Ittichaikulthol W, Sumethkul V, Chutipongtanate S. Effects of Desflurane and Sevoflurane anesthesia on regulatory T cells in patients undergoing living donor kidney transplantation: a randomized intervention trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01130-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04-58-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.