Effects of Minimal-Flow Sevoflurane and Multimodal Analgesia in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06521697
Last Updated: 2024-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-31
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Anesthetics on Microcirculation in Patients Undergoing Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT03209193
Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane for Catheter-related Bladder Discomfort
NCT02096224
Influence of Sevoflurane and Desflurane on Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT03259672
Comparison Between Remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion and Dexmedetomidine Bolus Administration for Smooth Emergence From General Sevoflurane Anesthesia
NCT01617694
Sevoflurane Wash in Method Using Conventional Flows Versus Low Flows of 0.5L
NCT06209112
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background and Significance:
Sevoflurane, a widely used anesthetic for prolonged surgeries, significantly contributes to healthcare-related greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing fresh gas flow during anesthesia effectively minimizes anesthetic usage, but concerns about potential renal damage hinder its clinical application. Recent studies show that sevoflurane enhances renal sympathetic nerve activity, leading to decreased renal blood flow and increased risks of acute kidney injury, particularly when coupled with factors like low blood pressure.
Multi-modal analgesia combining drugs like dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and lidocaine has emerged as a trend in anesthesiology. These drugs not only reduce sevoflurane usage but may also counteract its renal effects. This project aims to investigate the renal protective effects and anesthetic reduction potential of a multi-modal analgesia strategy in head and neck cancer surgeries.
Study Objectives:
To evaluate the anesthetic-sparing effect of minimal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia (0.5 L/min) combined with dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine multimodal analgesia.
To assess the renal protection effects of dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine multimodal analgesia during minimal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia.
To examine the safety and other potential effects (e.g., hemodynamic stability, postoperative cognitive function) of the combined anesthesia strategy.
Methods:
The study will be conducted at National Taiwan University Hospital and will involve adult patients (18-99 years) scheduled for head and neck cancer tumor resection and free flap reconstruction surgery. Patients will be randomized into four groups in a 2x2 factorial design:
Group 1 (HL + D): Fresh gas flow at 0.5 L/min with dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture.
Group 2 (HL): Fresh gas flow at 0.5 L/min with normal saline. Group 3 (D): Fresh gas flow at 1.0 L/min with dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture.
Group 4 (Control): Fresh gas flow at 1.0 L/min with normal saline. The dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture will be continuously infused from the induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery. Fresh gas flow settings will be maintained using the EtControl function of the GE Aisys CS2 anesthesia machine. Anesthetic depth and hemodynamic parameters will be monitored throughout the procedure.
Data Collection:
Primary Outcome Measures: Sevoflurane usage (mL/h) and changes in renal function (serum renin, AVP levels, urine KIM-1, NGAL levels).
Secondary Outcome Measures: Incidence of acute kidney injury, hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain scores, length of hospital stay, and postoperative cognitive function.
Blood and urine samples will be collected at four time points: before anesthesia induction, upon arrival in the ICU, 24 hours post-surgery, and 48 hours post-surgery. Clinical data, including demographic information, surgical details, anesthetic drug usage, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative outcomes, will also be recorded.
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods, including Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Statistical significance will be defined as p \< 0.05.
Potential Challenges and Solutions:
Potential challenges include patient recruitment and adherence to protocol. To mitigate these, the study will involve experienced anesthesiologists and research staff who will ensure proper patient selection and protocol compliance.
Expected Outcomes:
The study aims to propose a feasible strategy to mitigate sevoflurane's renal effects, crucial for patients at risk of acute kidney injury. It also seeks to validate that minimal fresh gas flow (0.5 L/min) during sevoflurane anesthesia, coupled with multimodal analgesia, reduces sevoflurane usage, saving costs and contributing to carbon reduction. Additionally, the study will explore the potential protective effects of the multimodal analgesia strategy on other organs during prolonged surgeries.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
Fresh gas flow at 0.5 L/min with dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture. Fresh gas flow at 0.5 L/min with normal saline. Fresh gas flow at 1.0 L/min with dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture. Fresh gas flow at 1.0 L/min with normal saline.
The study uses triple blinding (participant, care provider, investigator) to ensure unbiased results. The primary purpose of the study is treatment, aiming to reduce anesthetic usage and assess renal protection.
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
At the time of surgery, the envelope will be opened by a designated anesthesia nurse who will prepare the study medication (either the dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture or normal saline) according to the randomization. The medication will be labeled identically to maintain blinding and administered via continuous infusion during anesthesia. Fresh gas flow settings will be adjusted according to the randomization and indicated by a concealed flow meter display.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 (HL-D)
Fresh gas flow at 0.5 L/min with dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture
Multimodal analgesia using dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture
Multimodal analgesia using dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture vs placebo normal saline
Minimal flow sevoflurane
Minimal flow sevoflurane anesthesia (0.5 L/min) vs low flow sevoflurane (1 L/min)
Group 2 (HL-ND)
Fresh gas flow at 0.5 L/min with placebo normal saline
Minimal flow sevoflurane
Minimal flow sevoflurane anesthesia (0.5 L/min) vs low flow sevoflurane (1 L/min)
Group 3 (L-D)
Fresh gas flow at 1.0 L/min with dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture
Multimodal analgesia using dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture
Multimodal analgesia using dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture vs placebo normal saline
Group 4 (L-ND)
Fresh gas flow at 1.0 L/min with placebo normal saline
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multimodal analgesia using dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture
Multimodal analgesia using dexmedetomidine-ketamine-lidocaine mixture vs placebo normal saline
Minimal flow sevoflurane
Minimal flow sevoflurane anesthesia (0.5 L/min) vs low flow sevoflurane (1 L/min)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for head and neck cancer tumor resection and free flap reconstruction surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* History of previous head and neck cancer tumor resection
* Anemia (hematocrit \<30% or recent transfusion)
* Hypertension on ACEI/ARB medications
* Significant medical conditions (e.g., NYHA class 3 or 4 heart failure, eGFR \<60 ml/min/1.73 m², Child B or C liver failure, severe respiratory disorders, pre-existing cognitive impairment)
* ASA physical status 4 or 5
* Allergies to sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or lidocaine
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ming-Hui Hung, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan University Hosital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202403100MIND
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.