Enhanced Satiety With Pork Products Containing Dietary Fibre

NCT ID: NCT02521805

Last Updated: 2016-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized cross-over meal study will investigate the effects of protein quality and a combination of dietary fibre and protein on appetite regulation.

The study will use basic measures of ad libitum energy intake and visual-analogue scales of appetite (study A). A sub-study (study B) will additionally include blood collection from 15 of the 40 participants to investigate biological markers targeted satiety.

The study days will be conducted at least one week apart to eliminate carry over effects. In the sub-study, the study days will be at least two weeks apart due to blood collection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dietary proteins have shown to be the most satiating macronutrient, however it is not clear whether various types of protein exert the same effect. The latest evidence on animal versus plant proteins show no differences on appetite and ad libitum energy intake, neither on weight loss but well-designed studies that control for macronutrient composition of protein-rich foods are rare and therefore needed.

Dietary fibre have also shown to play a role in appetite regulation, especially viscous dietary fibre have a greater effect on short-term satiety and subsequent energy intake than less viscous dietary fibers. A combination of dietary fibre and protein would therefore be beneficial in formulation of satiety-enhancing foods targeted consumers who want to maintain or loose weight.

Pork is a good source of high-quality protein and essential vitamins and minerals. The fat content of most retail pork cuts lives up to the Nordic Key Hole nutrition label having less than 10 g fat per 100 gram. Pork can therefore be recognized as a lean meat type delivering key nutrients as part of the diet. Processed pork products such as sausages, liver pate and salamis are nutritionally characterized as high-fat products. However, today the meat industry puts a lot of effort into product development of meat products with a healthier nutritional profile.

The investigators have previously shown that the addition of wheat and rye bran to sausages with 10% fat reduced appetite sensations. Also, the satisfying effect of dietary fibers was more pronounced when added to sausages than when added to bread. These findings point towards a potential for using dietary fibre in meat products in order to improve the nutritional profile of the product as well as the satiating effects.

The overall objective is to investigate the effects of protein quality and a combination of dietary fibre and protein on appetite regulation. Dietary protein and fibre will be combined into an animal protein based food (fiber-meat balls), a vegetable protein based food (veggie "meat balls"), a meal (meat balls with fiber bread) and compared to animal protein per se (meat balls). The study will use measures of ad libitum energy intake and visual-analogue scales of appetite in combination with biological markers targeted satiety.

This study will contribute to a substantial increase in the knowledge on macronutrients and their stimulating effects on appetite-regulating hormones. The study will focus on healthy and palatable pork products containing dietary fibre in order to be applicable to the food industry. The current evidence supports the need for satiating-enhancing foods high in protein and dietary fibre. However, macronutrients and their stimulating effects on appetite-regulating hormones have not been adequately investigated in well-controlled studies using real foods. Likewise, there is no clear evidence that animal protein is superior to vegetable protein with regard to their satiating effects on appetite and appetite-regulating hormones.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PA

Animal protein and no fiber (control)

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Animal protein

Intervention Type OTHER

PAF

Animal protein added fiber

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Animal protein

Intervention Type OTHER

Dietary fiber (meat food matrice)

Intervention Type OTHER

PVF

Vegetable protein naturally containing dietary fiber

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vegetable protein

Intervention Type OTHER

Dietary fiber (vegetable food matrice)

Intervention Type OTHER

PAVM

Animal protein and dietary fiber in meal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Animal protein

Intervention Type OTHER

Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice)

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Animal protein

Intervention Type OTHER

Vegetable protein

Intervention Type OTHER

Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice)

Intervention Type OTHER

Dietary fiber (meat food matrice)

Intervention Type OTHER

Dietary fiber (vegetable food matrice)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants who have provided written informed consent
* Healthy men
* Ages between 18 and 40 years
* BMI between 18.5 and 25.0 kg/m2
* Pork eaters

Exclusion Criteria

* Any food allergy, dislike or special diet of relevance to the study
* Daily use of prescription medicine or over-the-counter drugs affecting appetite, energy expenditure or protein metabolism
* Irregular eating schedule
* Self-reporting currently dieting or having lost/gained significant amount of weight (±3 kg) in the previous 3 months
* Any known chronic diseases
* Vigorous physical activity more than 10 hours/week
* Smoking, smoking cessation within the past 3 months or nicotine use (\> 10 cigarettes per day)
* Substance abuse
* Alcohol intake above the recommendations from the Danish Health and Medicines Authority
* Blood donation \<3 month before study start and during study period (only relevant for the sub-study)
* Participants who work in appetite or feeding related areas
* Participation in other intervention studies
* Participants not able to comply with the study protocol as judged by study personnel
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Danish Meat Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anne Birgitte Raben

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Copenhagen

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kehlet U, Kofod J, Holst JJ, Ritz C, Aaslyng MD, Raben A. Addition of Rye Bran and Pea Fiber to Pork Meatballs Enhances Subjective Satiety in Healthy Men, but Does Not Change Glycemic or Hormonal Responses: A Randomized Crossover Meal Test Study. J Nutr. 2017 Sep;147(9):1700-1708. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.250332. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28794212 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B316 SAPO 2B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.