Plant-based Mince vs Beef Mince: Does One Make You Feel Fuller for Longer?
NCT ID: NCT04950595
Last Updated: 2021-07-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-31
2021-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Satiety Effects of Beef Compared to Beans
NCT01903499
Effects of Proportioning Meat and Plant-based Protein-rich Foods on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors (S58)
NCT04820829
Plant-Based Meat Analogues and Human Health
NCT07031752
Effect of Beans Compared to Beef on Satiety in Older Adults
NCT05499819
Mushroom Effects on Satiety and Gut Health Markers
NCT03352050
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To address this question, the investigators will assess the effect of substituting V2 mince for beef mince in a standard pasta meal on both the amount of the meal consumed and on feelings of fullness in the period after eating, as assessed by both subjective reporting, objective (biochemical) measures and the amount consumed at a subsequent meal occasion. The results of this study will provide proof-of-concept evidence of the potential enhanced satiating effects of V2 mince, and therefore whether it could potentially assist in a weight reduction dietary regime when substituted for standard beef mince.
This project will provide preliminary evidence to support whether V2 plant-based mince could contribute to increased satiety following a meal, which may assist in a weight reduction dietary regime when substituted for standard beef mince.
The investigators specific hypotheses are:
H1: That participants will consume less KJ when consuming the V2 plant-based meal in comparison to the equivalent meal prepared with beef mince.
H2: That fullness will be maintained to the same extent following consumption of the V2 and meat-based meals, such that participants will not increase their consumption at the subsequent meal period to compensate for this energy deficit.
The null hypothesis is that a meal containing V2 plant-based meat is no more satiating than an equivalent meal containing beef mince.
This study is a single-blinded, randomised cross-over trial, designed to compare the effect of a meal prepared using V2 plant-based meat to an equivalent meal prepared with beef mince on the amount consumed in the current meal and objective and subjective measures of post-prandial satiety. The test meals will be formulated so that the meal will contain 45% of V2 plant-based meat or beef mince prior to the meal being cooked. Participants will be provided with a serving that is expected to be in excess of what they would be able to comfortably eat, and instructed to eat until comfortably full. The amount of the leftovers will be carefully weighed and used to calculate the volume, energy and macronutrient intake consumed.
180 mins after lunch (\~3 pm), subjects will be presented with a standard cold buffet meal (including sliced bread, chicken, ham, cheese, mayonnaise, custard, yogurt, fruit salad and water) in excess of what they are expected to consume and allowed to eat ad libitum for up to 30 minutes. Participants will be asked to eat until they are comfortably full. The amount of each item consumed will be weighed and used to calculate total volume, energy and macronutrient intake.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Beef mince group
The test meal provided at lunch will be made up of 45% beef mince, with all remaining ingredients the same as the other arm.
Beef mince
Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with beef mince
Plant-based mince group
The test meal provided at lunch will be made up of 45% plant-based mince, with all remaining ingredients the same as the other arm.
Plant-based mince
Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with plant-based mince
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plant-based mince
Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with plant-based mince
Beef mince
Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with beef mince
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Aged between ≥18 \& ≤56 years at informed consent
3. Body mass index (BMI) ≥18.5 kg/m² and ≤27.5 kg/m² (confirmed during screening appointment)
4. Weight stable for last 6 months (\< +/- 5kg change)\*
5. Consume red meat regularly (at least 1 x week)
6. Willing to provide written Informed Consent
7. Be able to attend the CSIRO nutrition clinic for around 7 hours on two occasions across a two week period.
* Self-reported
Exclusion Criteria
2. Gastrointestinal symptoms\* (i.e. pain, reflux, diarrhea, or constipation), surgeries\* (i.e. bariatric surgery such as gastric banding) or use of medications\* (i.e. appetite suppressants, steroids) known to potentially affect energy intake, appetite, or gastrointestinal motor function
3. Known food allergies or intolerances to the study intervention products\^
4. History of eating disorders\*
5. Unable or unwilling to consume red meat
6. Current smoker (or history of smoking within the last six months)
7. History of or known presence of alcohol abuse or illicit drug use\*
8. Received an investigational drug within 28 days prior to Visit 1 that in the opinion of the investigator may affect the applicant's ability to participate in the study or the study results \*Self-reported, no clinical testing will be performed
18 Years
56 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
v2food (https://www.v2food.com/)
UNKNOWN
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bradley Klingner
Research Technician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bev Muhlhausler, BSc(Hons) PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VTF001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.