Plant-based Mince vs Beef Mince: Does One Make You Feel Fuller for Longer?

NCT ID: NCT04950595

Last Updated: 2021-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-31

Study Completion Date

2021-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project will provide preliminary evidence to support whether V2 plant-based mince could contribute to increased satiety following a meal, which may assist in a weight reduction dietary regime when substituted for standard beef mince.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Growing concerns about the sustainability and environmental impacts of red meat consumption have resulted in the increased uptake of plant-based red meat substitutes by consumers worldwide. In addition to the environmental benefits of these products, it has also been argued that they have the potential to offer additional health benefits. One such health benefit, and the focus of this study, is the potential for plant-based meats to produce a greater satiating effect in comparison to traditional meat products, and therefore potentially assist in supporting weight loss or weight maintenance in the longer term.

To address this question, the investigators will assess the effect of substituting V2 mince for beef mince in a standard pasta meal on both the amount of the meal consumed and on feelings of fullness in the period after eating, as assessed by both subjective reporting, objective (biochemical) measures and the amount consumed at a subsequent meal occasion. The results of this study will provide proof-of-concept evidence of the potential enhanced satiating effects of V2 mince, and therefore whether it could potentially assist in a weight reduction dietary regime when substituted for standard beef mince.

This project will provide preliminary evidence to support whether V2 plant-based mince could contribute to increased satiety following a meal, which may assist in a weight reduction dietary regime when substituted for standard beef mince.

The investigators specific hypotheses are:

H1: That participants will consume less KJ when consuming the V2 plant-based meal in comparison to the equivalent meal prepared with beef mince.

H2: That fullness will be maintained to the same extent following consumption of the V2 and meat-based meals, such that participants will not increase their consumption at the subsequent meal period to compensate for this energy deficit.

The null hypothesis is that a meal containing V2 plant-based meat is no more satiating than an equivalent meal containing beef mince.

This study is a single-blinded, randomised cross-over trial, designed to compare the effect of a meal prepared using V2 plant-based meat to an equivalent meal prepared with beef mince on the amount consumed in the current meal and objective and subjective measures of post-prandial satiety. The test meals will be formulated so that the meal will contain 45% of V2 plant-based meat or beef mince prior to the meal being cooked. Participants will be provided with a serving that is expected to be in excess of what they would be able to comfortably eat, and instructed to eat until comfortably full. The amount of the leftovers will be carefully weighed and used to calculate the volume, energy and macronutrient intake consumed.

180 mins after lunch (\~3 pm), subjects will be presented with a standard cold buffet meal (including sliced bread, chicken, ham, cheese, mayonnaise, custard, yogurt, fruit salad and water) in excess of what they are expected to consume and allowed to eat ad libitum for up to 30 minutes. Participants will be asked to eat until they are comfortably full. The amount of each item consumed will be weighed and used to calculate total volume, energy and macronutrient intake.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Participants

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Single-centre, single-blinded, randomised, cross-over trial.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Single (participants are blinded). The provision of the two test meals will be randomised and participants will be blinded to which meal they will receive (although we acknowledge they may be able to distinguish them by taste).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Beef mince group

The test meal provided at lunch will be made up of 45% beef mince, with all remaining ingredients the same as the other arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Beef mince

Intervention Type OTHER

Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with beef mince

Plant-based mince group

The test meal provided at lunch will be made up of 45% plant-based mince, with all remaining ingredients the same as the other arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plant-based mince

Intervention Type OTHER

Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with plant-based mince

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Plant-based mince

Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with plant-based mince

Intervention Type OTHER

Beef mince

Spaghetti bolognaise meal made with beef mince

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male individuals
2. Aged between ≥18 \& ≤56 years at informed consent
3. Body mass index (BMI) ≥18.5 kg/m² and ≤27.5 kg/m² (confirmed during screening appointment)
4. Weight stable for last 6 months (\< +/- 5kg change)\*
5. Consume red meat regularly (at least 1 x week)
6. Willing to provide written Informed Consent
7. Be able to attend the CSIRO nutrition clinic for around 7 hours on two occasions across a two week period.

* Self-reported

Exclusion Criteria

1. Health conditions\* that could affect appetite/food intake or require a prescribed diet such as gastrointestinal diseases \[including, but not limited to diverticulitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or coeliac disease\], type 1 or type 2 diabetes, cancer, renal or liver diseases
2. Gastrointestinal symptoms\* (i.e. pain, reflux, diarrhea, or constipation), surgeries\* (i.e. bariatric surgery such as gastric banding) or use of medications\* (i.e. appetite suppressants, steroids) known to potentially affect energy intake, appetite, or gastrointestinal motor function
3. Known food allergies or intolerances to the study intervention products\^
4. History of eating disorders\*
5. Unable or unwilling to consume red meat
6. Current smoker (or history of smoking within the last six months)
7. History of or known presence of alcohol abuse or illicit drug use\*
8. Received an investigational drug within 28 days prior to Visit 1 that in the opinion of the investigator may affect the applicant's ability to participate in the study or the study results \*Self-reported, no clinical testing will be performed
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

56 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

v2food (https://www.v2food.com/)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bradley Klingner

Research Technician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bev Muhlhausler, BSc(Hons) PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Brooke S Wymond, BNutrDiet(Hons)

Role: CONTACT

+61 8 8303 8856

Bev Muhlhausler, BSc(Hons) PhD

Role: CONTACT

+61 8 8303 0697

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VTF001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.