Effects of Different Mode of Exercise Training on Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01000519

Last Updated: 2017-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-12-31

Study Completion Date

2006-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomized study on the comparison between aerobic training versus progressive resistance training over a 2 months period for older adults with type 2 diabetes. The hypothesis is that progressive resistance training is just as effective as aerobic training on Hba1c and could be an alternative training for those older diabetic patients who cannot participate in aerobic exercise.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Many studies have shown the importance of aerobic training with respect to management of diabetes. However adoption of aerobic activities may be challenging for some individuals with diabetes, especially the elderly and the obese. There is increasing interest in resistance training and no study have looked at direct comparison between the two.

Subjects with diabetes but is generally sedentary (determined by means of a questionnaire) were recruited and randomized in one of the two groups. Subjects are supervised in a group and a completer is defined as one who completed 18 sessions within 8 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aerobic Training

50 minutes of aerobic training, 18 sessions within 2 months period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Aerobic Training

Intervention Type OTHER

18 sessions over 2 months period. Each session consist of 50 minutes of aerobic training at 65-70 % of maximum predicted heart rate

Progressive Resistance Training

50 minutes of progressive resistance training consisting of nine resistance exercises, each conducted 3 sets of 10 repetitions. 18 sessions over 2 months period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Progressive resistance training

Intervention Type OTHER

18 sessions completed in 2 months. each session consists of 50 minutes of resistance training which is made up of 3 sets of 10 repetitions of nine resistive exercises using machines and free weights at 65-70% of 1-repetitive maximum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aerobic Training

18 sessions over 2 months period. Each session consist of 50 minutes of aerobic training at 65-70 % of maximum predicted heart rate

Intervention Type OTHER

Progressive resistance training

18 sessions completed in 2 months. each session consists of 50 minutes of resistance training which is made up of 3 sets of 10 repetitions of nine resistive exercises using machines and free weights at 65-70% of 1-repetitive maximum.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Treadmill Cross trainer Cycling Weight training Circuit training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged 50 years and above,
* Hba1c between 8 to 10 % in the past one month,
* sedentary,
* able to continuously walk for at least 20 minutes and climbed one flight of stairs unaided without stopping were eligible for participation.

Exclusion Criteria

* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with Hba1c more than 10% or if escalation of treatment of glycemic control or dyslipidemia was likely to be necessary over the 2 months training period period,
* congestive cardiac failure, unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction within the last one year,
* proliferative diabetic retinopathy,
* uncontrolled hypertension,
* advanced arthritis likely to limit mobility or participation in prescribed exercises,
* respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease,
* significant proteinuria or chronic renal insufficiency,
* received drugs for the treatment of obesity or very low caloric diet (VLCD, less than 1000 kcal/ day),
* renal disease and
* inability to monitor glucose level or comply with exercise program.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Singapore General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Li Whye Cindy Ng

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Singapore General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boule NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA. 2001 Sep 12;286(10):1218-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.10.1218.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11559268 (View on PubMed)

Arora E, Shenoy S, Sandhu JS. Effects of resistance training on metabolic profile of adults with type 2 diabetes. Indian J Med Res. 2009 May;129(5):515-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19675378 (View on PubMed)

Ng CL, Tai ES, Goh SY, Wee HL. Health status of older adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus after aerobic or resistance training: a randomised trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Aug 2;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-59.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21810269 (View on PubMed)

Ng CL, Goh SY, Malhotra R, Ostbye T, Tai ES. Minimal difference between aerobic and progressive resistance exercise on metabolic profile and fitness in older adults with diabetes mellitus: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2010;56(3):163-70. doi: 10.1016/s1836-9553(10)70021-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20795922 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NMRC/0728/2003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effort During Resistance Training in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06497842 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Diabetes Exercise and Lifestyle Trial
NCT00877864 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1