Comparing Moderate and High-intensity Interval Training Protocols on Biomarkers in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

NCT ID: NCT03144505

Last Updated: 2017-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2016-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To overcome the lack of knowledge regarding the relative role of different intensities of aerobic training in adults with type 2 (T2D) diabetes, a 12 month randomized controlled trial will be performed to assess and compare the impact of two exercise groups: 1- high intensity interval training (HIIT) with resistance training; 2- moderate continuous training (MCT) with resistance training; and 3- a standard counseling home based control group; on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as the main outcome, and other selected cardiometabolic, body composition and quality of life markers, as secondary outcomes. This investigation aims to increase the current knowledge on HIIT and the related benefits on diabetes control and treatment in a time saving and physiological efficient framework, which will improve the general health and well-being of the diabetes population. A total of 105 participants with T2D will be recruited from the Lisbon area (35 control, 35 HIIT, and 35 MCT). The investigators hypothesize that high-intensity interval training, compared to moderate continuous training, will optimize the physiological adaptations and quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Contemporary exercise guidelines focus on continuous aerobic exercise using mainly moderate intensity exercises. However, there is growing evidence that HIIT has the same (or even further) benefits, with lower time commitment. This type of exercise has already been tested in T2D patients, using mostly short intervention studies, with significant improvements in relevant outcomes for T2D, such as glucose regulation. On the other hand, no study as yet compared the effects of HIIT and MCT (both combining resistance training, RT) in a long-term study design. Therefore, this study will use a 12 month randomized control trial to assess the effects of an HIIT combined with RT, and MCT combined with RT, in comparison with a control group (home base program), on glycemic control, inflammatory profile, endothelium function, cardiorespiratory fitness, quality of life, and body composition outcomes, in adult males and females with T2D.

The sample recruitment is planned to be made using media, mails, and community events. Participants can be considered eligible if age is set between 30 and 75 years old, a body mass index lower than 48 kg/m2, and if they have been diagnosed with T2D (according to the ADA criteria). Further criteria will be made upon their medical history concerning strokes, advanced neuropathy or retinopathy, and other health conditions that may interfere with this study's protocols or otherwise safe exercising. Power and sample size calculations (G-Power, Version 3.1.3) are based on a predicted hemoglobinA1c difference of 0.66 hemoglobinA1c units with an SD of effect of 1.2 hemoglobinA1c units, α=0.05, 1-β=0.80 and an expected dropout rate of 10%. The calculations yielded a minimum sample size of 105 participants (35 in each group).

The statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS Statistics (version 22.0, SPSS Inc., an IBM Company, Chicago IL, USA). Baseline differences between the interventions and the control group will be examined using ANOVA, or a non-parametric alternative in case of a non-normalized distribution. Outcome variables will be analyzed using three-way mixed factorial ANOVA. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. Simple and multiple regression analysis will be performed to test the relationships among the selected variables. Statistical significance will be set at p\<0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

The control group will be invited to an orientation session, where it will be provided detailed information concerning their home base exercise program. Additionally, once in every 4 weeks, the control group will meet for thematic sessions regarding diabetes topics, such as, nutrition, physical activity, and clinical complications. Due to ethical reasons, the control group needs to be provided with a standard counseling approach, as suggested in this research project.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

MCT combined with RT Group

MCT Group is designed to have equal energy expenditure when compared with HIIT Group. We standardized the exercise prescription according to body weight (kg), predicting that physical activity guidelines of 150 min peer week moderate intensity is equivalent to 10 kcal/kg of a combined session of RT and MCT. The MCT group will perform continuous cycling 3 days per week, with an exercise intensity of 40 to 59% of the heart rate reserve (HRR).

Participants will also perform an RT circuit: 1 set of two pull upper body exercises (seated row and lat pulldown); 1 set of two push upper body exercises (chest press and shoulder press); 1 set of two leg exercises (leg press and one leg lunge); and 1 set of two core exercises (dead bug and regular plank). Each set consisting in 10 to 12 repetitions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MCT combined with RT Group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

HIIT combined with RT Group

The HIIT program will perform cycle ergometer 3 days a week, and it will be divided into three phases: preparation phase (weeks 1-4), where the participants perform MCT (40-59% of the HRR); transition phase (weeks 5-8), in which the HIIT program is introduced progressively, starting with bouts of 2 minutes at 70% of the HRR, followed by 1 minute at 40-59% of the HRR (weeks 5-6), and finishing with bouts of 80% of the HRR, followed by 1 minute at 40-59% of the HRR (weeks 7-8); training phase (weeks 9-42), where the participants perform 1 minute of exercise at 90% of the HRR, followed by 1 minute resting at 40-59% of the HRR.

The HIIT session will have the same energy expenditure as the MCT group, using the 10kcal/kg week target. Participants will also fulfill the same RT as the MCT group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HIIT combined with RT Group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MCT combined with RT Group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

HIIT combined with RT Group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
* 30-75 years of age
* BMI \< 48 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented cardiovascular disease
* Advanced neuropathy or retinopathy
* Physical health condition that may interfere with study's protocols or exercising safety
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Associação Protectora dos Diabéticos de Portugal

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Lisbon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luís Bettencourt Sardinha

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luís Sardinha, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Correia IR, Hetherington-Rauth M, Magalhaes JP, Judice PB, Rosa GB, Henriques-Neto D, Manas A, Ara I, Silva AM, Sardinha LB. Compensatory mechanisms from different exercise intensities in type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Acta Diabetol. 2023 May;60(5):645-654. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02038-7. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36729308 (View on PubMed)

Magalhaes JP, Hetherington-Rauth M, Judice PB, Correia IR, Rosa GB, Henriques-Neto D, Melo X, Silva AM, Sardinha LB. Interindividual Variability in Fat Mass Response to a 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial With Different Exercise Intensities in Type 2 Diabetes: Implications on Glycemic Control and Vascular Function. Front Physiol. 2021 Sep 16;12:698971. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.698971. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34603073 (View on PubMed)

Judice PB, Magalhaes JP, Hetherington-Rauth M, Correia IR, Sardinha LB. Sedentary patterns are associated with BDNF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Mar;121(3):871-879. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04568-2. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33389140 (View on PubMed)

Magalhaes JP, Santos DA, Correia IR, Hetherington-Rauth M, Ribeiro R, Raposo JF, Matos A, Bicho MD, Sardinha LB. Impact of combined training with different exercise intensities on inflammatory and lipid markers in type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis from a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Oct 7;19(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01136-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33028418 (View on PubMed)

Hetherington-Rauth M, Magalhaes JP, Judice PB, Melo X, Sardinha LB. Vascular improvements in individuals with type 2 diabetes following a 1 year randomised controlled exercise intervention, irrespective of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness. Diabetologia. 2020 Apr;63(4):722-732. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05089-5. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31960071 (View on PubMed)

Magalhaes JP, Melo X, Correia IR, Ribeiro RT, Raposo J, Dores H, Bicho M, Sardinha LB. Effects of combined training with different intensities on vascular health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 18;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0840-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30885194 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SFRH/BD/85742/2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effort During Resistance Training in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06497842 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Life Without Diabetes
NCT02212665 COMPLETED NA