Effects of MWM Vs Sustained Mobilization on Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT ID: NCT07315464
Last Updated: 2026-01-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-30
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement as Compared to Kaltenborn Joint Mobilization in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06444945
"Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization Technique and Proprioceptive Exercises Among Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis"
NCT06971016
Effectiveness of DN With or Without Mulligan Two Leg Rotation Technique on Pain ROM and Joint Dysfunction in KO
NCT06739954
Mulligan Rotational Movement Versus Medial Gapping Technique in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05338840
Comparison of Exercise Therapy Vs Mobilization With Movement Among Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05403645
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
KL classification:
Grade 0: no narrowing; Grade 1: doubtful articular space constriction, osteophytic lipping is possible; Grade 2: permanent osteophytes, potential constriction of the joint space; Grade 3: mild osteophytes, definite constriction of the joint space, and potential end-bone deformation; Grade 4: severe osteophytes, severe constriction of the joint space, severe sclerosis, and definite deformation of the bone.
Radiographes or X-rays to assess pain and restlessness are the foundation for detecting and diagnosing knee OA. Key features that can be observed using X-rays are joint space narrowing, osteophytes, cyst formation, and subchondral sclerosis.The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a wellknown useful diagnostic tool to assess knee ligament injury and osteoarthritis. It includes 42 items in five sub-scales evaluating pain, symptoms, function of daily living, sport and recreation function (sport/rec), and (QOL).The Management of knee OA needs a multidisciplinary approach. The conservative treatment forms for knee OA comprise pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are mostly used for pain relief and stiffness caused by OA, with the numerous side effects, particularly on the gastrointestinal tract, making the treatment unsustainable.Manual therapy is a technique used to treat musculoskeletal dysfunctions and pain and usually includes manual therapies, such as massages, joint mobilization, and manipulations. Among the mobilization techniques, Mulligan's mobilization with movement (MWM) has been considered a good alternative for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, improving pain and ROM.MWM is based on the concept that minor position faults occur in articulating surfaces of joints following injury or strains, resulting in movement restriction and pain exacerbated by active contraction of muscles within the faulty positions of the joint. Thus, MWM involves passive accessory glide as a corrective technique, applied by the therapist perpendicular to the joint plane to correct the positional fault, combined with the offending movement being performed actively by the subject and sustained for several repetitions. The pain should always be reduced and/or eliminated during the application, and pain-free function should be restored.Sustained mobilisation is a hands-on therapy technique often used in the treatment of knee OA to help reduce pain and improve how well the joint moves. It involves gently holding the joint in a stretched or distracted position for a period of time, which can help loosen stiff tissues, improve joint lubrication, and ease discomfort. For people with knee osteoarthritis-who often experience pain, stiffness, and limited mobility-this type of mobilisation can be a useful way to manage symptoms and support better function. When combined with exercises and other rehabilitation strategies, sustained mobilisation may play a valuable role in improving overall joint health and quality of life.Eccentric exercise actions are characterized by low energy cost, high force production, hypertrophic impact, and a favorable effect on fall risk, physical function, and mobility. Eccentric resistance training may also increase volitional drive and reduce corticospinal inhibition to the muscle more than concentric training in OA. Eccentric actions are essential in daily activities, such as stair descent, squatting, or sitting into a chair.Therefore, this study aims to directly compare MWM and sustained mobilization, each integrated with eccentric strengthening exercises, to determine which approach is more effective for improving pain, range of motion, and functional performance in patients with Grade 3 knee OA. The findings will support physiotherapists in selecting the most appropriate, evidence-based interventions to enhance quality of life and functional independence for individuals living with moderate knee osteoarthritis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mulligan Mobilization
This group will hold intervention for MWM including passive glides while the eccentric exercises includes slow controlled squats
mulligan moblization
This group will receive total 3 sessions / week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Accessory Glide with pain free active knee motion + moderate intensity eccentric loading Type includes Mulligan MWM ( Passive Glide during active knee flexion/extension + Eccentric Quadricpes Exercises (Slow Controlled Squats ) Time 30-45 mins
Kaltenborn Mobilization
This arm's intervention includes grade II traction and eccentric loading
kaltenborn moblization
This group will receive frequency of 3 session/ week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Kaltenborn Grade II Traction according to pain tolerance + Moderate Intensity Eccentric Loading Type of Exercise includes Sustained Joint Mobilization in loose pack position + Quadriceps Exercises (Slow step down ) Time 35-45 mins
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mulligan moblization
This group will receive total 3 sessions / week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Accessory Glide with pain free active knee motion + moderate intensity eccentric loading Type includes Mulligan MWM ( Passive Glide during active knee flexion/extension + Eccentric Quadricpes Exercises (Slow Controlled Squats ) Time 30-45 mins
kaltenborn moblization
This group will receive frequency of 3 session/ week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Kaltenborn Grade II Traction according to pain tolerance + Moderate Intensity Eccentric Loading Type of Exercise includes Sustained Joint Mobilization in loose pack position + Quadriceps Exercises (Slow step down ) Time 35-45 mins
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Meets ACR criteria for knee OA
Exclusion Criteria
45 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo hospital, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vincent KR, Vincent HK. Concentric and Eccentric Resistance Training Comparison on Physical Function and Functional Pain Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct;99(10):932-940. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001450.
Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011 Spring;2(2):205-12.
Kataria Sweta Shah, K., Effect of Kaltenborn Traction versus Mulligan Mobilization with Movement as an adjunct to Conventional Exercise on Pain and Functions in Knee Osteoarthritis. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2023. 12(3): p. 1178-1182.
Gul, H. and I. Tahir, EFFECTS OF MULLIGAN ROTATIONAL MOVEMENT VERSUS MEDIAL GAPPING TECHNIQUE ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION AND DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS. Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation, 2024. 13(1): p. 99-110.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LCPT/DPT/ERB/35 FAKIHA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.