Effects of MWM Vs Sustained Mobilization on Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT07315464

Last Updated: 2026-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-30

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This article focused on people diagnosed with grade III Knee OA with sample size of 68 patients , who will randomly divided into two groups . Group A received Mulligan's MWM while group B received Kaltenborn's Sustained Mobilization along with eccentric exercises. The goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment conditions in reducing knee pain and improving joint function decreasing disability in daily activities. The patients followed a structured treatment plan over a set period and outcomes will measured using reliable clinical tools such as NPRS for pain KOOS for functional disability and Goniometer for ROM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The word osteoarthritis (OA) is comprised of two separate terms: the prefix "osteo" means bone, and arthritis means joint inflammation. Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis of the American Rheumatism Association, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee, defined OA as "a heterogeneous group of conditions that lead to joint symptoms and signs which are associated with defective integrity of articular cartilage, in addition to related changes in the underlying bone and at the joint margins. "The prevalence of knee pain and symptomatic OA is double in female as compared to male over 20 years. According to a study in people of age 45 or above prevalence of OA is 20% in women and 10% in men. The causes of knee OA include factors such as age, gender, weight, genetics, injuries, and overuse. Common signs and symptoms of knee OA include knee pain, joint stiffness, decreased muscle strength, and proprioceptive deficits. In addition, individuals with knee OA often exhibit poor neuromuscular control, slower walking speed, decreased functional ability, and an increased susceptibility to falling.The most common scale for knee OA classification is the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) system, which evaluates osteophyte formation, articular cartilage narrowing associated with subchondral bone sclerosis, and altered shape of bone ends from grade 0 to grade 4.

KL classification:

Grade 0: no narrowing; Grade 1: doubtful articular space constriction, osteophytic lipping is possible; Grade 2: permanent osteophytes, potential constriction of the joint space; Grade 3: mild osteophytes, definite constriction of the joint space, and potential end-bone deformation; Grade 4: severe osteophytes, severe constriction of the joint space, severe sclerosis, and definite deformation of the bone.

Radiographes or X-rays to assess pain and restlessness are the foundation for detecting and diagnosing knee OA. Key features that can be observed using X-rays are joint space narrowing, osteophytes, cyst formation, and subchondral sclerosis.The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a wellknown useful diagnostic tool to assess knee ligament injury and osteoarthritis. It includes 42 items in five sub-scales evaluating pain, symptoms, function of daily living, sport and recreation function (sport/rec), and (QOL).The Management of knee OA needs a multidisciplinary approach. The conservative treatment forms for knee OA comprise pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are mostly used for pain relief and stiffness caused by OA, with the numerous side effects, particularly on the gastrointestinal tract, making the treatment unsustainable.Manual therapy is a technique used to treat musculoskeletal dysfunctions and pain and usually includes manual therapies, such as massages, joint mobilization, and manipulations. Among the mobilization techniques, Mulligan's mobilization with movement (MWM) has been considered a good alternative for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, improving pain and ROM.MWM is based on the concept that minor position faults occur in articulating surfaces of joints following injury or strains, resulting in movement restriction and pain exacerbated by active contraction of muscles within the faulty positions of the joint. Thus, MWM involves passive accessory glide as a corrective technique, applied by the therapist perpendicular to the joint plane to correct the positional fault, combined with the offending movement being performed actively by the subject and sustained for several repetitions. The pain should always be reduced and/or eliminated during the application, and pain-free function should be restored.Sustained mobilisation is a hands-on therapy technique often used in the treatment of knee OA to help reduce pain and improve how well the joint moves. It involves gently holding the joint in a stretched or distracted position for a period of time, which can help loosen stiff tissues, improve joint lubrication, and ease discomfort. For people with knee osteoarthritis-who often experience pain, stiffness, and limited mobility-this type of mobilisation can be a useful way to manage symptoms and support better function. When combined with exercises and other rehabilitation strategies, sustained mobilisation may play a valuable role in improving overall joint health and quality of life.Eccentric exercise actions are characterized by low energy cost, high force production, hypertrophic impact, and a favorable effect on fall risk, physical function, and mobility. Eccentric resistance training may also increase volitional drive and reduce corticospinal inhibition to the muscle more than concentric training in OA. Eccentric actions are essential in daily activities, such as stair descent, squatting, or sitting into a chair.Therefore, this study aims to directly compare MWM and sustained mobilization, each integrated with eccentric strengthening exercises, to determine which approach is more effective for improving pain, range of motion, and functional performance in patients with Grade 3 knee OA. The findings will support physiotherapists in selecting the most appropriate, evidence-based interventions to enhance quality of life and functional independence for individuals living with moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study follows a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) model designed to compare the effectiveness of Mobilization with Movement (MWM) and Sustained Mobilization (Kaltenborn), each combined with eccentric exercises, in patients with Grade III knee osteoarthritis. Participants will be randomly allocated into two intervention groups using a computer-generated sequence with block randomization to ensure equal group sizes. A single-blinded approach will be used, where participants will unaware of group assignment, while outcome assessments were performed by an independent blinded evaluator. This model allows controlled comparison of both mobilization techniques on pain reduction, functional improvement, and range of motion.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
This study used a single-blinded design. Participants will be blinded to group allocation to minimize performance bias. Group assignment will be concealed through sealed, opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes, opened only after baseline assessment by an independent physiotherapist. The treating therapist will not be blinded due to the nature of manual therapy interventions. However, all outcome measurements-including pain, disability, and range of motion will be recorded by a separate blinded assessor to reduce detection bias.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mulligan Mobilization

This group will hold intervention for MWM including passive glides while the eccentric exercises includes slow controlled squats

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mulligan moblization

Intervention Type OTHER

This group will receive total 3 sessions / week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Accessory Glide with pain free active knee motion + moderate intensity eccentric loading Type includes Mulligan MWM ( Passive Glide during active knee flexion/extension + Eccentric Quadricpes Exercises (Slow Controlled Squats ) Time 30-45 mins

Kaltenborn Mobilization

This arm's intervention includes grade II traction and eccentric loading

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

kaltenborn moblization

Intervention Type OTHER

This group will receive frequency of 3 session/ week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Kaltenborn Grade II Traction according to pain tolerance + Moderate Intensity Eccentric Loading Type of Exercise includes Sustained Joint Mobilization in loose pack position + Quadriceps Exercises (Slow step down ) Time 35-45 mins

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mulligan moblization

This group will receive total 3 sessions / week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Accessory Glide with pain free active knee motion + moderate intensity eccentric loading Type includes Mulligan MWM ( Passive Glide during active knee flexion/extension + Eccentric Quadricpes Exercises (Slow Controlled Squats ) Time 30-45 mins

Intervention Type OTHER

kaltenborn moblization

This group will receive frequency of 3 session/ week (9-12 sessions) Intensity includes Kaltenborn Grade II Traction according to pain tolerance + Moderate Intensity Eccentric Loading Type of Exercise includes Sustained Joint Mobilization in loose pack position + Quadriceps Exercises (Slow step down ) Time 35-45 mins

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

slow controlled squats Eccentric Loading

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Age between 45 and 70 years Both male and female patients with a history of knee osteoarthritis were selectedfor this study. Clinically and radiologically diagnosed with Grade III Knee Osteoarthritis (basedon Kellgren and Lawrence scale).

Meets ACR criteria for knee OA

Exclusion Criteria

History of knee or lower limb surgery Received corticosteroid injections (oral or intra-articular) in the past 6 months Other musculoskeletal conditions in the lower limb(e.g., fracture, bursitis, back pain with radiating symptoms) Diagnosed with inflammatory joint diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout) Neurological conditions affecting lower limbs (e.g., stroke, neuropathy) BMI \> 35 (severe obesity) that limits safe participation in exercises Any contraindications to manual therapy (e.g., malignancy, infection, unstablejoint)
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo hospital, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fakiha Nayab, DPT

Role: CONTACT

03245399916

Wafa Mansha, MS NMPT

Role: CONTACT

03266303005

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vincent KR, Vincent HK. Concentric and Eccentric Resistance Training Comparison on Physical Function and Functional Pain Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct;99(10):932-940. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001450.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32324615 (View on PubMed)

Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011 Spring;2(2):205-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24024017 (View on PubMed)

Kataria Sweta Shah, K., Effect of Kaltenborn Traction versus Mulligan Mobilization with Movement as an adjunct to Conventional Exercise on Pain and Functions in Knee Osteoarthritis. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2023. 12(3): p. 1178-1182.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gul, H. and I. Tahir, EFFECTS OF MULLIGAN ROTATIONAL MOVEMENT VERSUS MEDIAL GAPPING TECHNIQUE ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION AND DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS. Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation, 2024. 13(1): p. 99-110.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LCPT/DPT/ERB/35 FAKIHA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.