Effect Of Sensory Motor Training Versus Resistance Training Among Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis.
NCT ID: NCT07262931
Last Updated: 2025-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-01
2026-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement Along With Sensory Motor Training in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05872997
Effects of Sensory Motor Training and Kinesthetic Exercises in Knee Osteoarthritis.
NCT06339944
Effects of Home Based Resistance Training as Compared to Supervised Resistance Training Exercise in the Management of Osteoarthritis.
NCT06076278
HIGH AND LOW INTENSITY PROGRESSIVE RESISTED EXERCISES ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION AND FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY
NCT05190380
Combined Mode-Kinetic Chain Exercise With and Without Core Stability Exercises on Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06377813
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Interventions for treating knee osteoarthritis include pharmacological and therapeutic technique. Present clinical recommendations in grade 1 and 2 favor conservative management, like physical therapy, use of assistive devices and weight management due to their simplicity, minimal side effects, and more economical. Due to extensive evidence showing the positive impact of physical activity on individuals with osteoarthritis, exercise is frequently recommended as a key element in the rehabilitation journey.
In various physical workout plans, muscle strengthening holds significance due to the connection between pain, muscle weakness, and limited function. Yet, standard strengthening routines might not suffice for individuals having functional joint instability. A research study on this specific group of patients explored treatments targeting symptoms directly, aiming to enhance the efficiency of the rehabilitation regimen. Recently awareness has been given by focusing on sensory inputs such as balance and proprioception exercises. It may allow individual to adapt motor skills for dealing with disability on knee. Sensorimotor training is an effective treatment to restore motor programs in patients among different musculoskeletal disorders and chronic musculoskeletal pain. It adopts a phase-oriented treatment approach and consists of regulation of arousal, emotion and behavior.
The goal of sensorimotor therapy training in knee osteoarthritis is to gain functional activities, relieve pain. As osteoarthritis advances, sensory-motor abilities like neuromuscular control, static and dynamic balance, and proprioception decrease due to reduced daily physical activities and heightened pain perception. Therefore, incorporating agility, coordination, and balance exercises such as cross steps while walking backward, walking on unsymmetrical surfaces and verbal commands by therapist can be beneficial by challenging individuals with disruptive loads. This exposure helps the neuromuscular system adapt to situations that may trigger knee instability during daily activities. Resistance training refers to a workout method where muscles are engaged against a resistance or weight. This training approach aids in strength enhancement, muscle building, and endurance improvement. It encompasses utilizing weights, resistance bands, or engaging in bodyweight exercises. The benefits of resistance training include overall fitness enhancement, bone density improvement, metabolism boost, and better physical performance. Proper execution of resistance training is crucial to prevent injuries and optimize workout effectiveness
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sensory Motor Group
Participants in the sensory-motor training group received 8-week program of exercise 2 times a week. It starts with a warm-up on stationary bicycle for 10 minutes, stretching exercises.
Sensory motor training
7.8. Interventions i FITT Principle: F: 2 times a week I: maximum to minimum T: Group 1 SMT, Group 2 RT T: 40-50 min Individuals were assigned 1:1 to either sensory motor training or resistance training.
ii Groups with sufficient details
1 Experimental: Group1: Participants in the sensory-motor training group received 8-week program of exercise 2 times a week. It starts with a warm-up on stationary bicycle for 10 minutes, stretching exercises. In this group the main focus was on agility exercises that includes a balance board, walking on different directions, crossing steps while walking backward and forward and walking on different surfaces. The duration for these exercises was 40-50 minutes per session.
Resistance training group
The individuals allocated to the resistance training received a same 8-weeks exercise program twice a week. Exercise began with the same warm-up on stationary bicycle for 10 minutes then traction was applied, Isometric hip flexion and leg extension, stretching exercises for lower limb, Quadriceps and hamstring strengthening using ankle weights were used with frequency twice a week. 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 30 to 40% of 1RM and low to moderate intensity loads were applied for 15 minutes bilaterally.
Resistance Training
The individuals allocated to the resistance training received a same 8-weeks exercise program twice a week. Exercise began with the same warm-up on stationary bicycle for 10 minutes then traction was applied, Isometric hip flexion and leg extension, stretching exercises for lower limb, Quadriceps and hamstring strengthening using ankle weights were used with frequency twice a week. 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 30 to 40% of 1RM and low to moderate intensity loads were applied for 15 minutes bilaterally.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Resistance Training
The individuals allocated to the resistance training received a same 8-weeks exercise program twice a week. Exercise began with the same warm-up on stationary bicycle for 10 minutes then traction was applied, Isometric hip flexion and leg extension, stretching exercises for lower limb, Quadriceps and hamstring strengthening using ankle weights were used with frequency twice a week. 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 30 to 40% of 1RM and low to moderate intensity loads were applied for 15 minutes bilaterally.
Sensory motor training
7.8. Interventions i FITT Principle: F: 2 times a week I: maximum to minimum T: Group 1 SMT, Group 2 RT T: 40-50 min Individuals were assigned 1:1 to either sensory motor training or resistance training.
ii Groups with sufficient details
1 Experimental: Group1: Participants in the sensory-motor training group received 8-week program of exercise 2 times a week. It starts with a warm-up on stationary bicycle for 10 minutes, stretching exercises. In this group the main focus was on agility exercises that includes a balance board, walking on different directions, crossing steps while walking backward and forward and walking on different surfaces. The duration for these exercises was 40-50 minutes per session.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age group include 40-60 years.
* Not done any exercise for at least 3 months
* Tibiofemoral osteoarthritis
* Grade I and II osteoarthritis
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncontrolled diabetes and Hypertension.
* Using ambulatory devices.
40 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lahore UBAS
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andriacchi TP, Favre J, Erhart-Hledik JC, Chu CR. A systems view of risk factors for knee osteoarthritis reveals insights into the pathogenesis of the disease. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Feb;43(2):376-87. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1117-2. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Gomiero AB, Kayo A, Abraao M, Peccin MS, Grande AJ, Trevisani VF. Sensory-motor training versus resistance training among patients with knee osteoarthritis: randomized single-blind controlled trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2018 Jan-Feb;136(1):44-50. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0174100917. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21657
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.