Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Techniques and Mulligan Mobilization Along With Conventional Physical Therapy in Knee Joint Osteoarthritis Patients

NCT ID: NCT06954363

Last Updated: 2026-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-11-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Mulligan Mobilization with conventional physical therapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA), with a specific focus on improving hamstring flexibility and reducing functional limitations. The findings will help inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes in OA rehabilitation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative joint disease characterized by the destruction of articular cartilage and the formation of bone spurs, leading to pain, joint stiffness, and decreased functional mobility. While its exact cause remains unknown, factors such as age, sex, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, genetics, bone density, smoking, and joint location contribute significantly to its development. As patients experience pain and reduced joint mobility, they often limit movement, particularly of the knee, resulting in muscular tightness-most notably in the hamstring, a two-joint muscle.

Globally, OA is a major public health concern, with knee OA affecting approximately 250 million people in 2010, including 18% of women and 9.6% of men over 60. It has substantial economic impacts, such as costing the United States 1-2.5% of its GDP and Spain €4.7 billion in 2007. Regional data from South Asia show higher prevalence in rural populations, emphasizing the disease's widespread burden.

Physical therapy has been shown to be highly effective in managing knee OA symptoms. Several randomized controlled trials support the use of techniques like Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Mulligan Mobilization. MET has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to static stretching and whole-body vibration in improving hamstring flexibility and reducing stiffness. Similarly, Mulligan Mobilization, particularly when combined with supervised exercises, has shown better outcomes than Maitland mobilization in improving flexibility and function in OA patients.

However, current literature presents conflicting evidence regarding the individual efficacy of MET and Mulligan Mobilization. This study seeks to address these inconsistencies by investigating the effectiveness of integrating both MET and Mulligan Mobilization with conventional physical therapy in treating knee OA. The goal is to provide evidence-based insights that can guide clinicians in optimizing therapeutic strategies for better functional outcomes and enhanced quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel treatment groups that includes experimental Group (Mulligan Mobilization + Conventional Physical Therapy) and Control Group (Muscle Energy Technique + Conventional Physical Therapy).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The study will utilize a single-blinded design, where the patients will be blinded to group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group

Participants in this group will receive Mulligan Mobilization combined with Conventional Physical Therapy. Mulligan Mobilization includes medial and lateral tibial glides using a Mulligan belt. Each session will consist of 3 sets of 10 repetitions, administered 5 days a week for 3 weeks. In addition, patients will undergo standard conventional physical therapy exercises such as quadriceps strengthening, straight leg raising, and stretching exercises. Each treatment session will last 30 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mulligan Mobilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mulligan Mobilization involves manual tibial glides (medial and lateral) using a mobilization belt. The patient lies supine with the knee flexed between 30°-45°. The therapist applies a sustained glide while the patient actively moves the knee into flexion and extension. The treatment is delivered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, along with a conventional physical therapy protocol.

Control Group

Participants in this group will receive Muscle Energy Technique (MET) targeting the hamstring muscles, in combination with Conventional Physical Therapy. The MET will follow a post-isometric relaxation approach, using both direct and indirect methods depending on patient condition. Each isometric contraction will be held for 10 seconds, followed by a 20-second stretch, repeated for 3 sets. Therapy will be conducted 5 days a week over a 3-week period. Each session will last 30 minutes. The same conventional physical therapy regimen as the intervention group will be applied.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Muscle Energy Technique involves the application of post-isometric relaxation targeting hamstring muscles. The therapist applies a 10-second isometric contraction at the resistance barrier, followed by a 20-second passive stretch, progressing into a new range of motion. This technique is applied 3 times per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, in combination with a conventional physical therapy protocol.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Muscle Energy Technique involves the application of post-isometric relaxation targeting hamstring muscles. The therapist applies a 10-second isometric contraction at the resistance barrier, followed by a 20-second passive stretch, progressing into a new range of motion. This technique is applied 3 times per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, in combination with a conventional physical therapy protocol.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mulligan Mobilization

Mulligan Mobilization involves manual tibial glides (medial and lateral) using a mobilization belt. The patient lies supine with the knee flexed between 30°-45°. The therapist applies a sustained glide while the patient actively moves the knee into flexion and extension. The treatment is delivered in 3 sets of 10 repetitions per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks, along with a conventional physical therapy protocol.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed cases of osteoarthritis (Grade 1 to 3)
* X-ray showing Grades I to III on Kellgren Lawrence scale of Osteoarthritis.
* Residents of Peshawar verified via NADRA CNIC
* Both genders will be included with unilateral or bilateral knee involvement.
* Age group 40 and above.
* Duration of Knee pain for more than 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of any previously known neurological conditions i.e. stroke, peripheral neuropathy
* Fractures in treatment limb.
* Suspicious of malignancy around the knee joint.
* Recent under gone surgery
* Recent Intra-articular injection.
* Significant comorbid diseases and disabilities are excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Khyber Medical University Peshawar

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Babar Israr, MSPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Khyber Medical University Peshawar

Shakir Ullah, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Khyber Medical University Peshawar

Samra Farid, MSPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Alkhidmat Hospital Peshawar

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar

Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan

Site Status

Alkhidmat Hospital Peshawar

Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan

Site Status

Bibi Zahida Memorial Hospital, NCS University System

Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Farazdaghi M, Kordi Yoosefinejad A, Abdollahian N, Rahimi M, Motealleh A. Dry needling trigger points around knee and hip joints improves function in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34391293 (View on PubMed)

Ceballos-Laita L, Jimenez-Del-Barrio S, Marin-Zurdo J, Moreno-Calvo A, Marin-Bone J, Albarova-Corral MI, Estebanez-de-Miguel E. Effects of dry needling on pain, pressure pain threshold and psychological distress in patients with mild to moderate hip osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Jun;51:102443. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102443. Epub 2020 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32507443 (View on PubMed)

Ashraf F, Anwar K, Arshad H. Effects of muscle energy technique along conventional physical therapy after mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in knee osteoarthritis patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2558-2564. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.9605.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39634887 (View on PubMed)

Goksen A, Can F, Yilmaz S, Korkusuz F. Comparison of different neuromuscular facilitation techniques and conventional physiotherapy in knee osteoarthritis. Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 13;51(6):3089-3097. doi: 10.3906/sag-2101-298.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34565133 (View on PubMed)

Sanchez-Romero EA, Pecos-Martin D, Calvo-Lobo C, Ochoa-Saez V, Burgos-Caballero V, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effects of dry needling in an exercise program for older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11255. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011255.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29952993 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KMU/DIR/CTU/2024/015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.