Evaluation of Sevoflurane Consumption During Initial Phase of Minimal-Flow Anesthesia in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07248917
Last Updated: 2025-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2025-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth
NCT05024084
Different Low-flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia Techniques
NCT04743193
Comparison Between Target-controlled Infusion of Propofol and Sevoflurane as Maintenance of Anesthesia to Hemodynamic Profile of Renal Transplant Recipient
NCT03214653
Anesthesia for Vascular Access Devices
NCT04749069
Recovery Following Desflurane Versus Sevoflurane for Outpatient Urologic Surgery in Elderly Females
NCT01310582
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In Group 1 (Minimal-flow group), the fresh gas flow was reduced to 0.5 L/min after the initial 10 minutes of anesthesia. In Group 2 (Low-flow group), a 1.0 L/min flow rate was maintained. Both groups received the same induction and maintenance protocols with sevoflurane, and depth of anesthesia was monitored via BIS (Bispectral Index). Key variables measured included the total amount of sevoflurane consumed (mL), the time to reach 1 MAC, the vaporizer shut-off time, intraoperative BIS and MAC values, EtCO₂, and respiratory rate. Safety outcomes such as hemodynamic stability and desaturation were also recorded.
The primary outcome was total sevoflurane consumption. Secondary outcomes included anesthetic depth consistency (BIS/MAC), respiratory parameters, and time-based metrics. Statistical analysis revealed that minimal-flow anesthesia significantly reduced sevoflurane usage without compromising patient safety or anesthetic depth.
The results support the clinical use of minimal-flow anesthesia as a safe, cost-effective, and environmentally favorable alternative to low-flow techniques in selected urological procedures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Minimal-flow Sevoflurane Group
Participants in this group received general anesthesia using sevoflurane with a fresh gas flow rate reduced to 0.5 L/min after the initial 10 minutes of induction. Anesthesia depth was monitored using BIS, and agent consumption and respiratory parameters were recorded throughout the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) procedure.
Sevoflurane Anesthesia with Minimal-flow
Patients received general anesthesia with sevoflurane. After induction, the fresh gas flow rate was reduced to 0.5 L/min during the maintenance phase of anesthesia for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Agent consumption and anesthetic depth (via BIS and MAC) were monitored.
Low-flow Sevoflurane Group
Participants in this group received general anesthesia using sevoflurane with a consistent 1.0 L/min fresh gas flow during the maintenance phase. BIS monitoring, agent consumption, and respiratory parameters were recorded throughout the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
Sevoflurane Anesthesia with Low-flow
Patients received general anesthesia with sevoflurane. A fresh gas flow rate of 1.0 L/min was maintained during the maintenance phase of anesthesia for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). BIS, MAC, and respiratory parameters were recorded.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sevoflurane Anesthesia with Minimal-flow
Patients received general anesthesia with sevoflurane. After induction, the fresh gas flow rate was reduced to 0.5 L/min during the maintenance phase of anesthesia for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Agent consumption and anesthetic depth (via BIS and MAC) were monitored.
Sevoflurane Anesthesia with Low-flow
Patients received general anesthesia with sevoflurane. A fresh gas flow rate of 1.0 L/min was maintained during the maintenance phase of anesthesia for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). BIS, MAC, and respiratory parameters were recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status I or II
Scheduled to undergo elective retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) under general anesthesia
Provided written informed consent
Able to cooperate with preoperative evaluation procedures
Exclusion Criteria
History of respiratory disease (e.g., asthma, COPD, restrictive lung disease)
Known hepatic or renal dysfunction
Neurological or psychiatric disorders that may affect BIS monitoring or anesthetic response
Known allergy or hypersensitivity to sevoflurane or other volatile anesthetics
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Obesity (BMI \> 30 kg/m²)
Anticipated difficult airway or history of intubation complications
Participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Umit Yildiz
Medical Doctor in Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
UMIT YILDIZ, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, University of Health Sciences
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024/16/925
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
KLKSH-ANES-SEVOMIN-RIRS-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.