Sigh in Pressure Support Ventilation to Detect Respiratory System Compliance and Lung Recruitability

NCT ID: NCT07172061

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-30

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this physiological study is to determine whether ventilator-delivered sigh breaths during pressure support ventilation (PSV) provide a reliable bedside index of lung recruitability and can guide PEEP optimization.The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does respiratory system compliance measured at the end of a sigh (Crs\_sigh) differ from compliance obtained with an inspiratory hold during an assisted breath (Crs\_assisted), and can the Crs\_sigh/Crs\_assisted ratio indicate recruitability?
* Does adjusting PEEP based on the sigh-derived recruitability index improve respiratory mechanics and gas exchange compared with usual clinical PEEP settings?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and RationaleInvasive mechanical ventilation is often necessary in critically ill adults but may contribute to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) if ventilator settings are not individualized. During assisted ventilation (pressure support ventilation, PSV), ongoing patient effort complicates the assessment of PEEP response, PEEP titration, and lung recruitability.Ventilator-delivered sigh breaths (i.e., brief sustained inflations) can improve gas exchange and promote alveolar recruitment, and may permit artifact-free assessment of respiratory mechanics in assisted modes. This study evaluates whether Crs measured at the end of a sigh provides reliable, clinically useful information on recruitability and whether the ratio of Crs during sigh to Crs during an assisted breath (Crs\_sigh/Crs\_assisted) can guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) optimization.Primary ObjectiveTo assess lung recruitability during PSV by normalizing Crs measured at the end of a sigh to Crs obtained with an inspiratory hold during an assisted breath.Secondary Objectives

* To quantify the proportion of patients in whom Pplat during assisted breathing is not reliable (non-readable or unstable ≥3 s).
* To determine whether adjusting PEEP according to the sigh-derived recruitability index improves Crs.

Inclusion criteria:Adults (≥18 years) receiving PSV with the ventilator's sigh function active.Exclusion criteria:

* Clinical contraindication to increasing PEEP
* Hemodynamic instability defined as SOFA cardiovascular score ≥3

Protocol OverviewEach participant undergoes two sequential, non-randomized steps:

* Step 1 (Clinical PEEP): Measurements are performed after ≥15 minutes at the treating team's current PEEP.
* Step 2 (Clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O): PEEP is increased by 3 cmH₂O; measurements are repeated after ≥15 minutes of stabilization.

In both steps, a sigh is programmed as a sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds (pressure-controlled), per routine practice and prior literature.Sigh Setting

* Sigh frequency: 1 sustained inflation every minute.
* Sigh target: 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds.
* If end-inspiratory flow did not reach 0 L/min, the inspiratory time of the sigh was extended to ensure an end-inspiratory alveolar pressure of 30 cmH₂O.
* The sigh pressure was identical in both PEEP steps.

Data CollectionBaseline demographics (age, sex, BMI), comorbidities, and hemodynamics are recorded. At the end of each 15-minute step (baseline and PEEP+3), we perform an end-inspiratory hold and an end-expiratory hold on a tidal assisted breath and measured:

* Plateau pressure (Pplat): Pplat is considered reliable only if the pressure trace is visually stable (flat) during the inspiratory hold.
* Static driving pressure: DP\_st = Pplat - PEEP.
* Dynamic driving pressure: DP\_dyn = Pressure Support + (ΔP\_occ × 0.75), where ΔP\_occ is the difference between total PEEP and the low airway pressure during the expiratory-hold maneuver.
* Tidal volume (Vt).
* Respiratory system compliance on tidal assisted breath: Crs\_tidal = Vt / DP\_st.
* P0.1.
* Occlusion pressure (P\_occ).
* Pressure Muscle Index: PMI = P\_peak - Pplat.
* Ventilatory Ratio (VR).
* Arterial blood gas (ABG). Compliance During Sigh and S/T IndexCrs during the mandatory sigh (Crs\_sigh) is computed at each step using the sigh volume and pressure recorded once the inspiratory flow reaches 0 L/min and airway pressure (Paw) is visually stable.The S/T index is defined as the ratio Crs\_sigh / Crs\_tidal.Using baseline Crs\_tidal, we estimate the sigh-induced volume (mL):V\_sigh,expected = (Psigh\_peak - PEEP) × Crs\_tidal,baseline.We also derive a compliance valid for the pressure range above Pplat up to the sigh pressure ("over-plateau" compliance):Crs\_overplat = (Vt\_sigh - Vt\_tidal) / (Psigh - Pplat).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clinical PEEP (baseline)

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) at the clinical PEEP with ventilator-delivered sighs: one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O)

Intervention Type OTHER

Each patient undergoes two sequential 15-minute steps: 1) pressure support ventilation at the clinical PEEP and 2) the same settings with PEEP increased by 3 cmH₂O. A ventilator-delivered sigh is programmed as one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute. All other ventilator parameters (trigger sensitivity, pressure support level, mandatory breath timing) remain unchanged. At the end of each step, inspiratory and expiratory holds are performed to collect respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases; compliance during the sigh is calculated once flow is zero and airway pressure is stable.

Clinical PEEP +3 cmH₂O

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) with PEEP set 3 cmH₂O above the clinical PEEP, with ventilator-delivered sighs: one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O)

Intervention Type OTHER

Each patient undergoes two sequential 15-minute steps: 1) pressure support ventilation at the clinical PEEP and 2) the same settings with PEEP increased by 3 cmH₂O. A ventilator-delivered sigh is programmed as one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute. All other ventilator parameters (trigger sensitivity, pressure support level, mandatory breath timing) remain unchanged. At the end of each step, inspiratory and expiratory holds are performed to collect respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases; compliance during the sigh is calculated once flow is zero and airway pressure is stable.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PSV + sigh (Clinical PEEP and Clinical PEEP + 3 cmH₂O)

Each patient undergoes two sequential 15-minute steps: 1) pressure support ventilation at the clinical PEEP and 2) the same settings with PEEP increased by 3 cmH₂O. A ventilator-delivered sigh is programmed as one sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds every minute. All other ventilator parameters (trigger sensitivity, pressure support level, mandatory breath timing) remain unchanged. At the end of each step, inspiratory and expiratory holds are performed to collect respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases; compliance during the sigh is calculated once flow is zero and airway pressure is stable.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (≥18 years) receiving PSV with the ventilator's sigh function active.

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical contraindication to increasing PEEP
* Hemodynamic instability defined as SOFA cardiovascular score ≥3
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

AUSL Romagna Rimini

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luca Bastia

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale Maurizio Bufalini

Cesena, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori

Monza, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shehabi Y, Chan L, Kadiman S, Alias A, Ismail WN, Tan MA, Khoo TM, Ali SB, Saman MA, Shaltut A, Tan CC, Yong CY, Bailey M; Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation (SPICE) Study Group investigators. Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):910-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2830-2. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23344834 (View on PubMed)

Marin-Corral J, Dot I, Boguna M, Cecchini L, Zapatero A, Gracia MP, Pascual-Guardia S, Vila C, Castellvi A, Perez-Teran P, Gea J, Masclans JR. Structural differences in the diaphragm of patients following controlled vs assisted and spontaneous mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr;45(4):488-500. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05566-5. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30790029 (View on PubMed)

Bianchi I, Grassi A, Pham T, Telias I, Teggia Droghi M, Vieira F, Jonkman A, Brochard L, Bellani G. Reliability of plateau pressure during patient-triggered assisted ventilation. Analysis of a multicentre database. J Crit Care. 2022 Apr;68:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34952477 (View on PubMed)

Bastia L, Amendolagine L, Pozzi F, Carenini S, Cipolla C, Curto F, Bellani G, Fumagalli R, Chieregato A. Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 1;51(10):e201-e205. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005964. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37326475 (View on PubMed)

Mauri T, Grieco DL, Spinelli E, Leali M, Perez J, Chiavieri V, Rosa T, Ferrara P, Scaramuzzo G, Antonelli M, Spadaro S, Grasselli G. Personalized positive end-expiratory pressure in spontaneously breathing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by simultaneous electrical impedance tomography and transpulmonary pressure monitoring: a randomized crossover trial. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):2125-2137. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07695-y. Epub 2024 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39527121 (View on PubMed)

Jonkman AH, Ranieri VM, Brochard L. Lung recruitment. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jul;48(7):936-938. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06715-z. Epub 2022 May 2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35499759 (View on PubMed)

Moraes L, Santos CL, Santos RS, Cruz FF, Saddy F, Morales MM, Capelozzi VL, Silva PL, de Abreu MG, Garcia CS, Pelosi P, Rocco PR. Effects of sigh during pressure control and pressure support ventilation in pulmonary and extrapulmonary mild acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2014 Aug 12;18(4):474. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0474-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25113136 (View on PubMed)

Patroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B, Maggioni E, Bigatello LM, Cereda M, Pesenti A. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11964584 (View on PubMed)

Albert RK, Jurkovich GJ, Connett J, Helgeson ES, Keniston A, Voelker H, Lindberg S, Proper JL, Bochicchio G, Stein DM, Cain C, Tesoriero R, Brown CVR, Davis J, Napolitano L, Carver T, Cipolle M, Cardenas L, Minei J, Nirula R, Doucet J, Miller PR, Johnson J, Inaba K, Kao L. Sigh Ventilation in Patients With Trauma: The SiVent Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Nov 28;330(20):1982-1990. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.21739.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37877609 (View on PubMed)

Mauri T, Eronia N, Abbruzzese C, Marcolin R, Coppadoro A, Spadaro S, Patroniti N, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Effects of Sigh on Regional Lung Strain and Ventilation Heterogeneity in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients Undergoing Assisted Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1823-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001083.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25985386 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SIREC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.