Effect of Variable PSV in Acute Lung Injury: Part I and Part II
NCT ID: NCT01683669
Last Updated: 2017-05-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the optimal variability for noisy PSV in patients with ALI based on its effects on respiratory mechanics, breathing comfort, gas exchange, and hemodynamics. The investigators hypothesize that noise in pressure support leads to variations in VT that are able to improve lung function and that physiologic variables respond differently to the degree of variability in pressure support
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Variable Pressure Support Ventilation in the Therapy of Acute Lung Injury
NCT00786292
Impact of the Assisted Ventilation Mode on Diaphragm Efficiency in Critically Ill Patients
NCT02473172
Effects of Different Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ALI/ARDS) Patients: Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV), Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Controlled by Patient
NCT00576771
Variable Pressure Support Trial
NCT01769053
Proportional Assisted Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Adult Patients With Prolonged Ventilation
NCT04140682
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Noisy-PSV 1
different levels of variable pressure support
Noisy-PSV 1
Noisy-PSV 1: different levels of variable pressure support (PS) will be randomized: a) PS variability equal to 0%, b) PS variability equal to 45%, c) PS variability equal to 90%.
Noisy-PSV 2
different levels of variable pressure support
Noisy-PSV 2
Noisy-PSV 2 : different levels of variable Pressure Support (PS) will be randomized: a) PS equal to Baseline and variability 0%; b) PS equal to Baseline and variability set in order achieve an increase or decrease of pressure of 5 cmH2O; c) PS equal to Baseline - 5 cmH2O and variability 0%; d) PS equal to Baseline - 5 cmH2O and set in order achieve an increase or decrease of pressure of 5 cmH2O.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Noisy-PSV 1
Noisy-PSV 1: different levels of variable pressure support (PS) will be randomized: a) PS variability equal to 0%, b) PS variability equal to 45%, c) PS variability equal to 90%.
Noisy-PSV 2
Noisy-PSV 2 : different levels of variable Pressure Support (PS) will be randomized: a) PS equal to Baseline and variability 0%; b) PS equal to Baseline and variability set in order achieve an increase or decrease of pressure of 5 cmH2O; c) PS equal to Baseline - 5 cmH2O and variability 0%; d) PS equal to Baseline - 5 cmH2O and set in order achieve an increase or decrease of pressure of 5 cmH2O.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intubated/tracheostomized patients in assisted mechanical ventilation
* PaO2/FiO2 100-300, with PEEP ≥ than 5 cmH2O.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of chronic lung disease (COPD)
* Presence of thoracic drainage
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Genova
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paolo Pelosi
Full Professor - Chair of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Chief of Intensive Care Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paolo Pelosi, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Genoa, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Intensive Care Medicine Unit - IRCCS San Martino - IST
Genoa, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Falk DJ, Deruisseau KC, Van Gammeren DL, Deering MA, Kavazis AN, Powers SK. Mechanical ventilation promotes redox status alterations in the diaphragm. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Oct;101(4):1017-24. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00104.2006. Epub 2006 May 4.
Esteban A, Anzueto A, Alia I, Gordo F, Apezteguia C, Palizas F, Cide D, Goldwaser R, Soto L, Bugedo G, Rodrigo C, Pimentel J, Raimondi G, Tobin MJ. How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1450-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9902018.
Seymour CW, Frazer M, Reilly PM, Fuchs BD. Airway pressure release and biphasic intermittent positive airway pressure ventilation: are they ready for prime time? J Trauma. 2007 May;62(5):1298-308; discussion 1308-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31803c562f.
Neumann P, Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Hinz J, Maripuu E, Andersson LG, Putensen C, Hedenstierna G. Spontaneous breathing affects the spatial ventilation and perfusion distribution during mechanical ventilatory support. Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):1090-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000163226.34868.0a.
Henzler D, Pelosi P, Bensberg R, Dembinski R, Quintel M, Pielen V, Rossaint R, Kuhlen R. Effects of partial ventilatory support modalities on respiratory function in severe hypoxemic lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1738-45. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218809.49883.54.
Suki B, Alencar AM, Sujeer MK, Lutchen KR, Collins JJ, Andrade JS Jr, Ingenito EP, Zapperi S, Stanley HE. Life-support system benefits from noise. Nature. 1998 May 14;393(6681):127-8. doi: 10.1038/30130. No abstract available.
Arold SP, Suki B, Alencar AM, Lutchen KR, Ingenito EP. Variable ventilation induces endogenous surfactant release in normal guinea pigs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003 Aug;285(2):L370-5. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00036.2003.
Boker A, Graham MR, Walley KR, McManus BM, Girling LG, Walker E, Lefevre GR, Mutch WA. Improved arterial oxygenation with biologically variable or fractal ventilation using low tidal volumes in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb 15;165(4):456-62. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.4.2108006.
Mutch WA, Lefevre GR, Cheang MS. Biologic variability in mechanical ventilation in a canine oleic acid lung injury model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1756-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.16372c. No abstract available.
Lefevre GR, Kowalski SE, Girling LG, Thiessen DB, Mutch WA. Improved arterial oxygenation after oleic acid lung injury in the pig using a computer-controlled mechanical ventilator. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Nov;154(5):1567-72. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912782.
Mutch WA, Harms S, Lefevre GR, Graham MR, Girling LG, Kowalski SE. Biologically variable ventilation increases arterial oxygenation over that seen with positive end-expiratory pressure alone in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2457-64. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00045.
McMullen MC, Girling LG, Graham MR, Mutch WA. Biologically variable ventilation improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):91-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00017.
Gama de Abreu M, Spieth PM, Pelosi P, Carvalho AR, Walter C, Schreiber-Ferstl A, Aikele P, Neykova B, Hubler M, Koch T. Noisy pressure support ventilation: a pilot study on a new assisted ventilation mode in experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):818-27. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000299736.55039.3A.
Spieth PM, Carvalho AR, Guldner A, Pelosi P, Kirichuk O, Koch T, de Abreu MG. Effects of different levels of pressure support variability in experimental lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2009 Feb;110(2):342-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318194d06e.
Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, Matthay MA, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):327-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032193.
Ball L, Sutherasan Y, Fiorito M, Dall'Orto A, Maiello L, Vargas M, Robba C, Brunetti I, D'Antini D, Raimondo P, Huhle R, Schultz MJ, Rocco PRM, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P. Effects of Different Levels of Variability and Pressure Support Ventilation on Lung Function in Patients With Mild-Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 22;12:725738. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.725738. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
91/12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.