The Effects of Rotational Prisms on Badminton Players' Ocular Vergence Training and Enhancement of Shot Accuracy
NCT ID: NCT07105462
Last Updated: 2025-08-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-24
2025-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A total of 26 collegiate badminton athletes aged 18 to 25 years will be recruited from two universities in Taiwan. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: a visual training group using the active ADRRPs system, and a control group using a sham version of the same device containing plano lenses (with no prism effect). Training will be delivered twice per week for four weeks, with each session lasting 15 minutes. During each session, participants will view a video while the device applies alternating prism stimulation based on each individual's pre-measured fusional vergence capacity.
Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and after the four-week training period. These include vergence facility (cycles per minute), accommodative facility (flipper test), near point of convergence, and positive fusional vergence at near. Reaction time will be measured using a light-based agility task with BlazePod sensors, and hitting performance will be evaluated using a shuttlecock launcher that delivers randomized targets to various court zones.
All participants will be monitored for any adverse events, and any symptoms such as diplopia, dizziness, or discomfort will be documented. Data will be analyzed as described in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Action Video Games and Stroboscopic Glasses on Dynamic Visual Acuity.
NCT05956938
Bridging Animal and Human Models of Exercise-induced Visual Rehabilitation
NCT02911805
Characteristics of the Vergence Responses of Binocularly Normal Subjects After a Vision Therapy Protocol
NCT05208658
Visual Stimulus and Eye Movement
NCT00001172
Moderators and Mediators of Perceptual Learning
NCT05894967
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study targets young adult badminton players with at least two years of consistent training. Participants are randomly allocated to either an experimental group, which receives active prism training using the ADRRPs, or a control group using an identical headset without prism rotation. Both groups undergo training sessions twice a week for four weeks, with each session lasting 15 minutes. Visual stimuli are standardized across groups and delivered at a fixed near working distance of 40 cm.
The prism rotation parameters are set to simulate dynamic vergence demands based on pre-measured individual capabilities. This approach aims to create a structured vergence load while minimizing visual discomfort. The control condition serves to control for placebo and attentional effects.
Outcome measures are selected to assess both oculomotor and performance domains. These include vergence facility, accommodative facility, near point of convergence, and positive fusional vergence-all measured using standardized optometric tools. Reaction time is assessed via a BlazePod light stimulus test, and hitting accuracy is evaluated through a shuttlecock launcher delivering randomized trajectories to simulate game-like performance.
The trial design incorporates single-blinding and concealed allocation procedures. Data analysis will follow a pre-specified statistical analysis plan, and participants will be closely monitored for any adverse symptoms during the course of the intervention. Ethics approval has been obtained from the relevant institutional review board.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: Vergence Training with ADRRPs
Participants assigned to this arm will receive vergence training using Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms (ADRRPs), a computerized visual device designed to induce alternating base-out and base-in prism stimulation. The prisms rotate automatically to simulate dynamic convergence and divergence demands, cycling between 0 to 30 prism diopters base-out over 5 seconds and 30 base-out to 10 base-in over 3 seconds. Each participant will undergo 8 training sessions over 4 weeks (twice weekly), with each session lasting 15 minutes. During training, participants view standardized video targets positioned at a 40 cm working distance while instructed to maintain clear and single binocular vision. The intervention aims to engage and strengthen vergence eye movements critical for visual performance in dynamic sports environments.
Arm 1 - Experimental Group Intervention Name: ADRRPs Vergence Training Intervention Description: Participants wore an Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prism (ADRRPs) headset to perform vergence eye
ADRRPs Vergence Training
Intervention Description:
Participants wore an ADRRPs headset that applied alternating base-in and base-out prism power to stimulate vergence eye movements. Prism levels were customized based on each participant's fusional vergence. Training was performed twice weekly for 15 minutes over four weeks while viewing a near video target.
Sham Visual Training with Plano Lenses
Intervention Description:
Participants wore an identical ADRRPs headset fitted with plano lenses that produced no prism effect. The procedure and schedule matched the experimental group but provided no vergence stimulation, serving as a sham control.
Arm 2: Sham Training with Plano Lenses
Participants assigned to this arm will undergo sham vergence training using the same Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms (ADRRPs) headset, but fitted with non-refractive plano lenses and with no prism rotation. The training schedule and environment are identical to the intervention arm: 8 sessions over 4 weeks (twice weekly), with each session lasting 15 minutes. Visual targets are presented at a 40 cm viewing distance using the same video stimuli. This sham training condition is designed to control for potential placebo effects and to isolate the specific influence of dynamic prism-induced vergence stimulation used in the experimental arm.
1. Experimental Group Intervention Name: ADRRPs-Based Vergence Training; 2. Control Group Intervention Name: Sham Training with Plano Lenses.
ADRRPs-Based Vergence Training This intervention used the Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms (ADRRPs) system to deliver alternating base-in and base-out prism stimulation for vergence training. Prism levels were customized based on each participant's fusional vergence. Training was conducted twice per week for four weeks, 15 minutes per session, while participants viewed a near video target. This protocol provides automated and symmetric vergence demand, distinguishing it from conventional near-point or static prism exercises.
Sham Training with Plano Lenses Participants used the same ADRRPs headset as the experimental group but with plano lenses that produced no prism effect. The training schedule and visual tasks matched the experimental condition, but no vergence stimulus was applied. This design enabled participant masking while providing no active optical stimulation, serving as a sham comparator distinct from both active training and no-treatment controls.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arm 1 - Experimental Group Intervention Name: ADRRPs Vergence Training Intervention Description: Participants wore an Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prism (ADRRPs) headset to perform vergence eye
ADRRPs Vergence Training
Intervention Description:
Participants wore an ADRRPs headset that applied alternating base-in and base-out prism power to stimulate vergence eye movements. Prism levels were customized based on each participant's fusional vergence. Training was performed twice weekly for 15 minutes over four weeks while viewing a near video target.
Sham Visual Training with Plano Lenses
Intervention Description:
Participants wore an identical ADRRPs headset fitted with plano lenses that produced no prism effect. The procedure and schedule matched the experimental group but provided no vergence stimulation, serving as a sham control.
1. Experimental Group Intervention Name: ADRRPs-Based Vergence Training; 2. Control Group Intervention Name: Sham Training with Plano Lenses.
ADRRPs-Based Vergence Training This intervention used the Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms (ADRRPs) system to deliver alternating base-in and base-out prism stimulation for vergence training. Prism levels were customized based on each participant's fusional vergence. Training was conducted twice per week for four weeks, 15 minutes per session, while participants viewed a near video target. This protocol provides automated and symmetric vergence demand, distinguishing it from conventional near-point or static prism exercises.
Sham Training with Plano Lenses Participants used the same ADRRPs headset as the experimental group but with plano lenses that produced no prism effect. The training schedule and visual tasks matched the experimental condition, but no vergence stimulus was applied. This design enabled participant masking while providing no active optical stimulation, serving as a sham comparator distinct from both active training and no-treatment controls.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum of 2 years of consistent badminton training
* Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in both eyes (distance and near)
* No history of ocular pathology
* Willingness to comply with all study procedures and follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* History of ocular trauma, strabismus surgery, or refractive surgery
* Neurological or systemic conditions affecting vision
* Ongoing medication that may influence ocular motor function
18 Years
25 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
China Medical University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hsuan-Yu Huang, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
College of Health Sciences, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Taichung, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRREC-114-011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.