Study of Binocular Computer Activities for Treatment of Amblyopia
NCT ID: NCT02200211
Last Updated: 2019-02-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
485 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-11
2016-08-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Binocular Dig Rush Game Treatment for Amblyopia
NCT02983552
Binocular iPad Sub-Study
NCT02365090
Proof of Concept Study of Binocular Videogames Versus Patching for Amblyopia
NCT04784390
An Active Approach to Treat Amblyopia: Video Game Play
NCT01223716
Binocular Visual Therapy and Video Games for Amblyopia Treatment.
NCT03655912
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Binocular Treatment
Binocular computer game play 1 hour per day, 7 days per week (minimum of 4 days per week)
iPad®
Binocular therapy on iPad®
Patching Treatment
Patching 2 hours per day, 7 days per week
Patching 2 hours per day, 7 days per week
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
iPad®
Binocular therapy on iPad®
Patching 2 hours per day, 7 days per week
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Amblyopia associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both (previously treated or untreated)
1. Criteria for strabismus: At least one of the following must be met:
* Presence of a heterotropia on examination at distance or near fixation (with or without spectacles)
* Documented history of strabismus which is no longer present (which in the judgment of the investigator could have caused amblyopia)
2. Criteria for anisometropia: At least one of the following criteria must be met:
* ≥0.50 diopter (D) difference between eyes in spherical equivalent
* ≥1.50 D difference between eyes in astigmatism in any meridian
3. Criteria for combined-mechanism amblyopia: Both of the following criteria must be met:
* Criteria for strabismus are met (see above)
* ≥1.00 D difference between eyes in spherical equivalent OR ≥1.50 D difference between eyes in astigmatism in any meridian
* Note: the spherical equivalent requirement differs from that in the definition for refractive/anisometropic amblyopia
3. No amblyopia treatment in the past 2 weeks (patching, atropine, Bangerter, vision therapy)
4. Refractive correction (spectacles or contact lenses, if applicable) must meet the following criteria at enrollment and be based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 7 months old.
1. Requirements for Correction of Refractive Error:
1. For subjects meeting criteria for strabismic (only) amblyopia (see 2.2.1 #2 above):
• Hypermetropia, if corrected, must not be under-corrected by more than +1.50 D spherical equivalent, and the reduction in plus sphere must be symmetric in the two eyes.
2. For subjects meeting criteria for anisometropic or combined-mechanism amblyopia (see 2.2.1 #2 above):
* Spherical equivalent must be within 0.50 D of fully correcting the anisometropia
* Hypermetropia must not be under-corrected by more than +1.50 D spherical equivalent, and reduction in plus must be symmetric in the two eyes
* Cylinder power in both eyes must be within 0.50 D of fully correcting the astigmatism
* Cylinder axis for both eyes must be within 6 degrees of the axis of the cycloplegic refraction when cylinder power is ≥1.00 D
2. Refractive corrections meeting the above criteria must be worn for either:
* 16 weeks or more or
* Until visual acuity in amblyopic eye is stable (defined as 2 consecutive visual acuity measurements by the same testing method at least 4 weeks apart with \<1 line change (\<5 letters if E-ETDRS))
3. Monocular or binocular contact lens wear is allowed provided the contact lenses meet the above refractive requirements at the corneal plane. The same form of correction must be worn throughout the entire study during study procedures (i.e., no changing between contacts and spectacles while patching or while game-playing or study testing). Safety glasses are not required for subjects wearing contact lenses, but investigators are encouraged to suggest safety glasses be worn over contact lenses.
5. Visual acuity, measured in each eye without cycloplegia in current refractive correction (if applicable) within 7 days prior to randomization using the Amblyopia Treatment Study single-surround HOTV (ATS-HOTV) visual acuity protocol for children \< 7 years and the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity protocol for children ≥ 7 years on a study-approved device displaying single surrounded optotypes, as follows:
1. Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye 20/40 to 20/200 inclusive (33 to 72 letters if E-ETDRS)
2. Visual acuity in the fellow eye 20/25 or better (≥ 78 letters if E-ETDRS)
3. Interocular difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines (≥ 15 letters if E-ETDRS) (i.e., amblyopic-eye acuity at least 3 logMAR lines worse than fellow-eye acuity)
6. Heterotropia or heterophoria with a total near deviation of ≤ 10∆ (measured by PACT).
7. Ability to align the nonius cross on the binocular game system (angles of ocular deviation \>10∆ would require the nonius cross to be adjusted to such an extent that playing of the game would be compromised).
8. Subject is able to play Hess Falling Blocks game on the study iPad® (on easy setting) under binocular conditions (with red-green glasses), as demonstrated by scoring at least 1 line in the office.
9. Investigator is willing to prescribe computer game play or patching per protocol.
10. Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization.
11. Parent has phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff.
12. Relocation outside of area of an active Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) site for this study within the next 16 weeks is not anticipated.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Prism in the refractive correction at time of enrollment (eligible only if prism is discontinued 2 weeks prior to enrollment).
2. Myopia greater than -6.00 D spherical equivalent in either eye.
3. Previous intraocular or refractive surgery.
4. Any treatment for amblyopia (patching, atropine, Bangerter filter, or vision therapy) during the past 2 weeks. Previous amblyopia therapy is allowed regardless of type, but must be discontinued at least 2 weeks immediately prior to enrollment.
5. Ocular co-morbidity that may reduce visual acuity determined by an ocular examination performed within the past 7 months (Note: nystagmus per se does not exclude the subject if the above visual acuity criteria are met).
6. No Down syndrome or cerebral palsy
7. No severe developmental delay that would interfere with treatment or evaluation (in the opinion of the investigator). Subjects with mild speech delay or reading and/or learning disabilities are not excluded.
8. Heterotropia or heterophoria with a total ocular deviation \>10∆ (phoria plus tropia \>10∆) at near (measured by PACT).
5 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
NETWORK
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan Holmes, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Mayo Clinic
Vivan Manh, OD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Holmes JM, Manh VM, Lazar EL, Beck RW, Birch EE, Kraker RT, Crouch ER, Erzurum SA, Khuddus N, Summers AI, Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Effect of a Binocular iPad Game vs Part-time Patching in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years With Amblyopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):1391-1400. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4262.
Tailor V, Ludden S, Bossi M, Bunce C, Greenwood JA, Dahlmann-Noor A. Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 7;2(2):CD011347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011347.pub3.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
PEDIG Public Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ATS18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.