Observation Versus Occlusion Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia
NCT ID: NCT01032330
Last Updated: 2020-05-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
611 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Objectives:
* To determine the effectiveness of occlusion for the treatment of intermittent exotropia among patients aged 3 to \< 11 years who have baseline near stereoacuity of 400 arcsec or better by Preschool Randot stereotest
* To determine the natural history of intermittent exotropia among patients aged 3 to \< 11 years who have baseline near stereoacuity of 400 arcsec or better by Preschool Randot stereotest
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Full-Time Occlusion Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia in Children
NCT05462821
Trial of Vision Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia
NCT04487249
Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Unilateral Recess-Resect for Intermittent Exotropia
NCT01032603
Improving Control of Intermittent Exotropia
NCT07272005
Evaluation and Treatment of Pediatric Eye Diseases
NCT00006422
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One aim of the present study is to better understand the natural history of IXT. Available reports on the natural history of IXT disagree on the progression of the disease. A 1966 study by von Noorden (cited in von Noorden and Campos) found that over an average of 3.5 years of follow-up, 75% of 51 patients showed signs of IXT progression, 9% showed no change, and 16% improved without therapy. A 1968 retrospective study by Hiles et al found that after a minimum of 6 years follow up with observation and nonsurgical treatment, 81% of 48 patients showed no change in angle of deviation. The results of more recent retrospective studies show some reporting that the majority of cases improve over time, others reporting that most cases remain stable, and still others reporting that most cases deteriorate. It is therefore unclear what proportion of patients, if left untreated, is likely to deteriorate, improve, or remain stable over time. Natural history data acquired during this study will help determine not only what proportion of patients change over time, but whether there are associated prognostic indicators of deterioration or improvement. Such data will not only enable better identification of those patients with IXT likely to benefit from treatment and those for whom treatment is likely to be unnecessary, but will also improve the quality of medical advice to parents regarding the likely progression of the disease, thus alleviating anxiety.
The aim of most forms of non-surgical treatments for IXT is to improve the strength and/or quality of binocular single vision by either eliminating suppression, increasing awareness of diplopia, and/or increasing positive fusional amplitudes. Commonly used non-surgical treatment methods include: occlusion, fusional vergence exercises (sometimes known as vision therapy or orthoptics), and over-minus lenses. When surveyed in 1990, members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus reported that occlusion was the most commonly used form of non-surgical treatment. More recently (2008), a poll of our investigator group revealed again that occlusion was the most widely prescribed non-surgical treatment for children affected by IXT.
Occlusion is thought to work by interrupting the development of or eliminating already present suppression, an adaptation to avoid diplopia in IXT. Persistent or entrenched suppression prevents normal binocular vision and may lead to permanent loss of stereoacuity. If successful, occlusion may then result in improved binocular sensory fusion.
As reported in recent reviews of treatment for IXT, previous studies of occlusion vary regarding the recommended occlusion dose (from 3 hours a day to full time), the optimum duration of occlusion treatment (from 6 weeks to 42 months), and which eye should be occluded (preferred/dominant eye or alternate eyes). For the majority of studies, part-time occlusion, rather than full-time occlusion was preferred. In the three occlusion studies conducted prospectively, the recommended dose was either 3 hours a day, 3 to 6 hours a day, or 4 to 6 hours a day, and the duration of occlusion ranged from 3 months to 6 months to up to 42 (mean 15) months. Nevertheless, these previous studies of occlusion for the treatment of IXT used a variety of outcome measures at a variety of non-standardized time points; therefore, no definite conclusions can be drawn from the existing literature.
Although occlusion treatment for IXT treatment is widely used, there have been no randomized clinical trials evaluating its effectiveness. Understanding the degree of effectiveness of occlusion treatment for IXT and the natural history of IXT has important public health implications. Successful restoration of binocular alignment and normal binocular function with occlusion therapy, or spontaneous improvement, will reduce the proportion of children undergoing surgery. Defining the rate of success with either occlusion or observation is therefore important in planning treatment for children with IXT. Alternatively, evidence of low treatment effectiveness with occlusion will help avoid unnecessary treatment.
The present study is being conducted to assess the natural history of IXT and to establish the effectiveness of occlusion in its treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Observation
Patients randomized to the observation group will receive no treatment (other than refractive correction).
No interventions assigned to this group
Occlusion Therapy
Patients randomized to the occlusion treatment group will receive occlusion (patching) for 3 hours per day for at least 3 months. Choice of which eye to occlude, or whether to alternate daily, is at investigator's discretion.
occlusion treatment
Patients randomized to the occlusion treatment group will receive occlusion (patching) for 3 hours per day for at least 3 months. Choice of which eye to occlude, or whether to alternate daily, is at investigator's discretion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
occlusion treatment
Patients randomized to the occlusion treatment group will receive occlusion (patching) for 3 hours per day for at least 3 months. Choice of which eye to occlude, or whether to alternate daily, is at investigator's discretion.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intermittent exotropia (manifest deviation) meeting all of the following criteria:
* Intermittent exotropia at distance OR constant exotropia at distance and either intermittent exotropia or exophoria at near
* Exodeviation at least 15PD at distance OR near measured by prism and alternate cover test (PACT)
* Exodeviation at least 10PD at distance measured by PACT
* No previous surgical or non-surgical treatment for IXT (other than refractive correction)
* Visual acuity in the worse eye at least 0.3 logMAR (20/40 on ATS HOTV or 70 letters on E-ETDRS) for children ≥ 3 years of age
* No interocular difference of visual acuity more than 0.2 logMAR (2 lines on ATS HOTV or 10 letters on E-ETDRS) for children ≥ 3 years of age
* No hyperopia greater than +3.50 D spherical equivalent in either eye
* No myopia greater than -6.00 D spherical equivalent in either eye
* No prior strabismus, intraocular, or refractive surgery
* No abnormality of the cornea, lens, or central retina
* Investigator willing to observe the IXT untreated for 3 years unless specific criteria for deterioration are met
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior non-surgical treatment for IXT other than refractive correction (e.g., vergence therapy, occlusion, vision therapy/orthoptics, or deliberate over-minus with spectacles more than 0.50D)
* Previous amblyopia treatment other than refractive correction within 1 year
* Vision therapy/orthoptics for any reason within the last year
* Interocular visual acuity difference more than 0.2 logMAR (2 lines on ATS HOTV for patients 3 to \< 7 years old or 10 letters on E-ETDRS for patients ≥ 7 years old) (patients ≥ 3 years only) and/or investigator plans to initiate amblyopia treatment at this time.
* Limitation of ocular rotations due to restrictive or paretic strabismus
* Craniofacial malformations affecting the orbits
* Ocular disorders which would reduce visual acuity (except refractive error)
* Prior strabismus surgery or botulinum injection, intraocular surgery, or refractive surgery
* Strabismus surgery planned
* Known skin reactions to patch or bandage adhesives
* Significant neurological impairment such as cerebral palsy. Patients with mild speech delays or common reading and/or learning disabilities are not excluded.
* Investigator planning to change refractive correction at this time (if the patient is otherwise eligible, the investigator should consider prescribing refractive correction and bringing the patient back at a later time for enrollment)
12 Months
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
NETWORK
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susan A Cotter, O.D., M.S.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Southern California College of Optometry, Fullerton, CA
Brian G Mohney, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Southern California College of Optometry
Fullerton, California, United States
Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Cotter SA, Mohney BG, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Repka MX, Melia M, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Birch EE, Kraker RT, Tamkins SM, Miller AM, Sala NA, Glaser SR. A randomized trial comparing part-time patching with observation for children 3 to 10 years of age with intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2299-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Mohney BG, Cotter SA, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Chen AM, Melia M, Donahue SP, Wallace DK, Kraker RT, Christian ML, Suh DW. A Randomized Trial Comparing Part-time Patching with Observation for Intermittent Exotropia in Children 12 to 35 Months of Age. Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug;122(8):1718-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Writing Committee; Mohney BG, Cotter SA, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Wallace DK, Yamada T, Petersen DB, Kraker RT, Morse CL, Melia BM, Wu R. Three-Year Observation of Children 3 to 10 Years of Age with Untreated Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2019 Sep;126(9):1249-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
Cotter SA, Mohney BG, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Wallace DK, Melia BM, Wu R, Kraker RT, Superstein R, Crouch ER, Paysse EA; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Three-year observation of children 12 to 35 months old with untreated intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Mar;40(2):202-215. doi: 10.1111/opo.12668.
Pang Y, Gnanaraj L, Gayleard J, Han G, Hatt SR. Interventions for intermittent exotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD003737. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003737.pub4.
Holmes JM, Hercinovic A, Melia BM, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Chandler DL, Dean TW, Kraker RT, Enyedi LB, Wallace DK, Mohney BG, Cotter SA; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Health-related quality of life in children with untreated intermittent exotropia and their parents. J AAPOS. 2021 Apr;25(2):80.e1-80.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.10.011. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
PubMed Abstract - Older Cohort
PubMed Central HHS Public Access - Full Text - Older Cohort
PubMed Abstract - Younger Cohort
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NEI-146
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.