Office-based Vision Therapy for Improving Reading and Attention in Children With Convergence Insufficiency
NCT ID: NCT02207517
Last Updated: 2020-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
311 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-31
2020-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial (CITT)
NCT00338611
Objective Assessment of Disparity Vergence After Treatment of Symptomatic CI in Children
NCT03248336
Trial of Vision Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia
NCT04487249
Screening for Convergence Insufficiency in School-age Children
NCT00472407
Study of Eye Movement Testing and Therapy
NCT00472485
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is well documented that children with symptomatic CI report significantly more symptoms when reading and doing close work (e.g., blurred vision, headaches, double vision, loss of concentration, frequent loss of place, trouble remembering what was read), manifest more academic-impairing behaviors (e.g., difficulty finishing assignments), and score worse on parent ratings of attention compared to children with normal binocular vision. Because reduction of symptoms and adverse academic behaviors are established outcomes of successful treatment of CI, we propose to test the hypothesis that resolution of these symptoms and behaviors leads to improved reading performance and attention. Previous studies have found improvements in reading comprehension reading speed and accuracy after successful treatment of CI. In a recent pilot study, investigators also found significant improvement in reading comprehension and attention after 16 weeks of successful treatment of symptomatic CI with office-based vergence/accommodative therapy; however, there was no control group. To definitively determine whether the successful treatment of symptomatic CI positively impacts reading and attention requires a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.
Objective: We propose a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 324 children ages 9 to \<14 years (Grades 3-8) with symptomatic CI. \[we will restrict recruitment to children who do not have significant single word reading deficits.\] Participants will be randomized to 16 weeks of treatment with either \[a\] office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with home reinforcement (OBVAT) or \[b\] office-based placebo therapy with home reinforcement (OBPT). Outcomes (reading and attention) will be assessed after 16 weeks of treatment. In addition, we will test the long-term effects on outcomes at 1 year after treatment completion. All analyses will test the null hypothesis of no difference in outcomes between the two treatment groups.
Specific Aim 1 - Reading Performance: To compare reading comprehension outcomes for children with symptomatic CI who receive 16 weeks of OBVAT and OBPT treatment. The primary outcome measure of reading performance is the Wechsler Individual Achievement test (WIAT-III) reading comprehension subtest score. In secondary analyses, we will examine the effects of the treatment on word reading, pseudoword decoding, oral reading fluency, and listening comprehension. We also will examine the correlation of changes in CI symptoms and ophthalmic signs with reading outcomes. Analysis of the 1-year follow-up data will be used to determine if any gains in reading performance observed after 16 weeks of treatment are sustained.
Specific Aim 2 - Attention: To investigate the effect of treatment on teacher- and parent-rated measures of attention for children with symptomatic CI who receive 16 weeks of OBVAT and OBPT intervention. The primary outcome measure of attention is the score on the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Scale (SWAN). In secondary analyses, we will examine the effects of treatment on a second parent-rated attention scale called the SNAP. We also will examine the correlation of changes in CI-symptoms and ophthalmic signs with attention outcomes. Analysis of the 1-year follow-up data will be used to determine if any gains in attention observed after 16 weeks of treatment are maintained.
Scientific and Clinical Impact: The relationship between the treatment of symptomatic CI and its effect on reading and attention in children is unknown. The results of the proposed study will contribute to a better understanding of these relationships and help to resolve controversy surrounding this issue. The results will have important implications for educators, psychologists, eye professionals, and other health care providers who care for children with reading and attention problems and guide hypothesis development for future scientific investigations on evidence-based relationships between visual disorders and other developmental disorders in children.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Office-based verg/accomm therapy (OBVAT)
OBVAT requires a participant to undergo a specific vision therapy regimen with 16 weekly, 60-minute in-office treatment sessions. Vision Therapists (O.D., M.D., Orthoptists, or specially-trained technicians) administer the therapy in the office. OBVAT procedures are then supplemented with various home therapy procedures
Office-based vergence/accommodative therapy
The OBVAT program has been divided into 4 phases. Within each phase there are a number of categories such as gross convergence, vergence, and accommodation. The therapy procedures in each category have been arranged sequentially from easiest to most difficult
Office-based placebo therapy (OBPT)
Office-based Placebo Therapy (OBPT) requires a participant to undergo a specific therapy regimen of 16 weekly, 60 minute, in-office treatment sessions. Vision therapists (optometrists, ophthalmologists, orthoptists, or specially-trained technicians) administer the therapy in the office. OBPT procedures are then supplemented with placebo home therapy procedures.
The procedures for OBPT are designed with the intent of not providing a beneficial training effect on vergence, accommodation, saccadic accuracy, or visual attention beyond normal activities. However, the procedures are designed to simulate real vision therapy in such a way that it will be difficult for participants and parents to know that they have been assigned to the control group and thus are not receiving bonafide OBVAT
Office-based vergence/accommodative therapy
The OBVAT program has been divided into 4 phases. Within each phase there are a number of categories such as gross convergence, vergence, and accommodation. The therapy procedures in each category have been arranged sequentially from easiest to most difficult
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Office-based vergence/accommodative therapy
The OBVAT program has been divided into 4 phases. Within each phase there are a number of categories such as gross convergence, vergence, and accommodation. The therapy procedures in each category have been arranged sequentially from easiest to most difficult
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Grades 3 through 8
3. CI Symptom Survey (CISS) score greater or equal to 16
4. Exophoria at near at least 4 prism diopters greater than at far
5. Receded near point of convergence (NPC) of 6 cm or greater break
6. Insufficient positive fusional vergence (PFV) at near (i.e., failing Sheard's or PFV less than or equal to 15 BO break)
7. Best-corrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye
8. Random dot stereopsis appreciation of 500 seconds of arc or better
9. Wearing appropriate refractive correction (spectacles or contact lenses) for at least 2 weeks prior to final determination of eligibility for any of the following uncorrected refractive errors (based on cycloplegic refraction within prior 12 months)
* Myopia greater than -0.75D spherical equivalent (SE) in either eye
* Hyperopia greater than +2.00D SE in either eye
* SE anisometropia greater than 0.75D
* Astigmatism greater than 1.00D in either eye
Correction for patients meeting above refractive error criteria must meet the following guidelines:
* SE anisometropia must be within 0. 75D of the full anisometropic correction
* Astigmatism must be within 0.75D of full correction; axis must be within 6◦ if astigmatism greater than or equal to 1.00D
* For hyperopia, the sphere can be reduced by up to 1.50 D provided reduction is symmetrical
* For myopia, the SE must be within 0.75D of the full myopic correction
10. No use of BI prism or plus add at near for 2 weeks prior to study and for duration of study
11. English is primary language spoken at home or child proficient in English as determined by the school
12. Parent does not expect child to start any new ADHD medicine or change the dose of any currently taken ADHD medicine while child is being treated in the study
13. Parental permission to contact the child's teacher(s) for study purposes
14. Parent and child understand protocol and are willing to accept randomization
Exclusion Criteria
2. Esophoria of greater than or equal to 2∆ at distance
3. Vertical heterophoria greater than or equal to 2∆ at distance or near
4. greater than or equal to 2 line interocular difference in best-corrected distance visual acuity
5. Monocular near point of accommodation greater than 20 cm (accommodative amplitude less than 5D) in right eye
6. Manifest or latent nystagmus
7. Word Reading subtest score less than 80 on the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-4)
8. Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT-2) Matrices subtest score less than 70
9. History of prior strabismus, intraocular, or refractive surgery
10. CI previously treated with any form of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy or home-based vergence therapy (e.g., computerized vergence therapy)
11. CI associated with head trauma or known disease of the brain
12. Diseases known to affect accommodation, vergence, or ocular motility
13. Inability to comprehend and/or perform any study-related test or therapy procedure
14. Speech-language disorder (e.g., stuttering) that would interfere with interpretation of digital recordings of reading tests
15. Significant hearing loss
16. Household member enrolled in present CITT-ART, treated currently, or treated within the past 6 months with any form of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy or home-based vergence therapy (e.g., computerized vergence therapy)
17. Parent or other household member is an eye care professional, ophthalmic technician, ophthalmology or optometry resident, or optometry student
9 Years
13 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Marshall B. Ketchum University
UNKNOWN
Ohio State University
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
State University of New York College of Optometry
OTHER
Akron Children's Hospital
OTHER
Nova Southeastern University
OTHER
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
OTHER
Salus University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mitchell Scheiman
Dean of Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mitchell Scheiman, OD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Salus University
Lynn MItchell, MAS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ohio State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama, Birmingham College of Optometry
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Southern California College of Optometry Marshall B. Ketchum University
Fullerton, California, United States
NOVA Southeastern University College of Optometry
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
State University of Optometry College of Optometry
New York, New York, United States
Akron Children's Hospital
Akron, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University College of Optometry
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Pennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
CITT-ART Investigator Group. Effect of Vergence/Accommodative Therapy on Attention in Children with Convergence Insufficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Mar 1;98(3):222-233. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001659.
Scheiman M, Kulp MT, Cotter SA, Lawrenson JG, Wang L, Li T. Interventions for convergence insufficiency: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 2;12(12):CD006768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006768.pub3.
CITT-ART Investigator Group. Effect of Vergence/Accommodative Therapy on Reading in Children with Convergence Insufficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Nov;96(11):836-849. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001442.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Salus - HMS1310
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.