Characteristics of the Vergence Responses of Binocularly Normal Subjects After a Vision Therapy Protocol
NCT ID: NCT05208658
Last Updated: 2022-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-02
2022-03-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Oculomotor Therapy in Individuals With Convergence Insufficiency
NCT07036263
Natural History of MTBI-related Convergence Insufficiency & Effectiveness of Vision Therapy for MTBI-related CI
NCT06848673
Visual Function Abnormalities in Strabismus and Amblyopia and Response to Therapy
NCT04310241
Visual Stimulus and Eye Movement
NCT00001172
Stochastic Resonance Applied to Amblyopia Training and the Plasticity of Brain
NCT04213066
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The EG will do weekly office-based therapy of 45 minutes during 12 weeks and the CG will do weekly office-based placebo therapy of 15 minutes during 12 weeks. This placebo therapy will consist of smooth-pursuit and discrimination exercises that do not influence vergence response. The office-based done by the EG consists of a vergence therapy and its protocol will follow Scheiman's indications protocol. This vision therapy will train both positive and negative fusional vergence amplitudes in the same proportion.
A pre-evaluation, a during evaluation, and a post-evaluation will be done at weeks 1, 6, and 12 respectively to all subjects. After the post-evaluation week, the CG will do 12 weeks more of office-based therapy but, this group will do the same conventional vergence protocol as EG. The CG will be evaluated at week 18, and finally, at week 24.
During the evaluations, the vergence eye movements will be measured during the positive and negative fusional vergence tests. The break and the recovery points will be evaluated to all the subjects with three different methods performed in a randomized order: (1) objective computer-based test in the haploscopic system, (2) prism bar, and (3) phoropter rotary prisms. All these tests will be performed at 40 cm with a classic central visual target.
This study aims to evaluate objectively the change in the vergence responses of binocular and accommodative normal subjects after performing a classic vision therapy protocol.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Classical Vision Therapy Treatment: vision therapy exercises for fusional vergence abilities
The Experimental Group (EG) it consist in a Classical Vision Therapy Treatment. This group will do weekly office-based therapy of 45 minutes of visual exercises during 12 weeks. The office-based done by the EG consists of a vergence therapy and its protocol will follow Scheiman's Protocol and Indications.
The exercises do not tough the eye or use drugs. They are just visual training exercises that improve fusional convergence and divergence response.
Experimental: Classical Vision Therapy Treatment
Do classical vision therapy treatment for improve vergence
Eye Movement Therapy Treatment: vision therapy placebo exercises not improve fusional vergence
The Control Group or Placebo Group consist in a Control: Eye Movement Therapy Treatment. This group will do weekly office-based placebo therapy of 15 minutes during 12 weeks of visual exercises. This placebo therapy will consist of smooth-pursuit and discrimination exercises that do not influence vergence response.
The exercises do not tough the eye nor use drugs. They are just visual training exercises that do not improve fusional vergence response as they improve smooth-pursuit eye movements.
Experimental: Classical Vision Therapy Treatment
Do classical vision therapy treatment for improve vergence
Control: Eye Movement Therapy Treatment
Do eye movement therapy treatment in order not to improve vergence
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Experimental: Classical Vision Therapy Treatment
Do classical vision therapy treatment for improve vergence
Control: Eye Movement Therapy Treatment
Do eye movement therapy treatment in order not to improve vergence
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Refractive error measured with the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 Autorefractor
3. Cover Test at near (40 cm)
4. Near Point of Accommodation
5. Near Point of Convergence
6. Vergence Facility Test at near (40 cm)
7. Monocular and binocular Accommodation Facility Test at near (40 cm)
8. Negative and Positive Relative Accommodation Test (ARN and ARP)
9. Random Dot 2 Stereo acuity Test
10. CISS questionnaire
11. Fusional Vergence Amplitude using both subjective and objective methods
Exclusion Criteria
* having an eye pathology
* having a binocular or an accommodative disorder
* using orto-K lenses
20 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cristina Rovira Gay
Principal Investigator, Predoctoral student
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cristina Rovira-Gay
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Scheiman M, Mitchell GL, Cotter S, Cooper J, Kulp M, Rouse M, Borsting E, London R, Wensveen J; Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of treatments for convergence insufficiency in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;123(1):14-24. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.1.14.
Scheiman M, Talasan H, Alvarez TL. Objective Assessment of Disparity Vergence after Treatment of Symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency in Children. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Jan;96(1):3-16. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001320.
Alvarez TL, Scheiman M, Santos EM, Morales C, Yaramothu C, D'Antonio-Bertagnolli JV, Biswal BB, Gohel S, Li X. The Convergence Insufficiency Neuro-mechanism in Adult Population Study (CINAPS) Randomized Clinical Trial: Design, Methods, and Clinical Data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;27(1):52-72. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2019.1679192. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Scheiman M, Mitchell GL, Cotter S, Kulp MT, Cooper J, Rouse M, Borsting E, London R, Wensveen J. A randomized clinical trial of vision therapy/orthoptics versus pencil pushups for the treatment of convergence insufficiency in young adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;82(7):583-95. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000171331.36871.2f.
Scheiman M, Chase C, Borsting E, Mitchell GL, Kulp MT, Cotter SA; CITT-RS Study Group. Effect of treatment of symptomatic convergence insufficiency on reading in children: a pilot study. Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jul;101(4):585-593. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12682. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of treatments for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;126(10):1336-49. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.10.1336.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Vergence VT Protocol
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.