Characteristics of the Vergence Responses of Binocularly Normal Subjects After a Vision Therapy Protocol

NCT ID: NCT05208658

Last Updated: 2022-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-02

Study Completion Date

2022-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A vision therapy protocol for vergence ability is mentioned. The purpose of this study is to evaluate objectively the change in the vergence responses of binocular and accommodative normal subjects after performing a classic vision therapy protocol. This study is an interventional, cross-over, and randomized study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After the first evaluation, subjects will be classified in the Experimental Group (EG) or Control Group (CG) randomly. There will be 18 subjects in each group. A classic vision therapy protocol for fusional vergence will be performed in the EG and the CG will be doing a placebo therapy, based on studies done before.

The EG will do weekly office-based therapy of 45 minutes during 12 weeks and the CG will do weekly office-based placebo therapy of 15 minutes during 12 weeks. This placebo therapy will consist of smooth-pursuit and discrimination exercises that do not influence vergence response. The office-based done by the EG consists of a vergence therapy and its protocol will follow Scheiman's indications protocol. This vision therapy will train both positive and negative fusional vergence amplitudes in the same proportion.

A pre-evaluation, a during evaluation, and a post-evaluation will be done at weeks 1, 6, and 12 respectively to all subjects. After the post-evaluation week, the CG will do 12 weeks more of office-based therapy but, this group will do the same conventional vergence protocol as EG. The CG will be evaluated at week 18, and finally, at week 24.

During the evaluations, the vergence eye movements will be measured during the positive and negative fusional vergence tests. The break and the recovery points will be evaluated to all the subjects with three different methods performed in a randomized order: (1) objective computer-based test in the haploscopic system, (2) prism bar, and (3) phoropter rotary prisms. All these tests will be performed at 40 cm with a classic central visual target.

This study aims to evaluate objectively the change in the vergence responses of binocular and accommodative normal subjects after performing a classic vision therapy protocol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vision Disorders Eye; Movement Disorder (Binocular) Vision Therapy Binocular Vision Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Classical Vision Therapy Treatment: vision therapy exercises for fusional vergence abilities

The Experimental Group (EG) it consist in a Classical Vision Therapy Treatment. This group will do weekly office-based therapy of 45 minutes of visual exercises during 12 weeks. The office-based done by the EG consists of a vergence therapy and its protocol will follow Scheiman's Protocol and Indications.

The exercises do not tough the eye or use drugs. They are just visual training exercises that improve fusional convergence and divergence response.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental: Classical Vision Therapy Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Do classical vision therapy treatment for improve vergence

Eye Movement Therapy Treatment: vision therapy placebo exercises not improve fusional vergence

The Control Group or Placebo Group consist in a Control: Eye Movement Therapy Treatment. This group will do weekly office-based placebo therapy of 15 minutes during 12 weeks of visual exercises. This placebo therapy will consist of smooth-pursuit and discrimination exercises that do not influence vergence response.

The exercises do not tough the eye nor use drugs. They are just visual training exercises that do not improve fusional vergence response as they improve smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Experimental: Classical Vision Therapy Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Do classical vision therapy treatment for improve vergence

Control: Eye Movement Therapy Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Do eye movement therapy treatment in order not to improve vergence

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental: Classical Vision Therapy Treatment

Do classical vision therapy treatment for improve vergence

Intervention Type OTHER

Control: Eye Movement Therapy Treatment

Do eye movement therapy treatment in order not to improve vergence

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vision therapy protocol Vision therapy protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Monocular and binocular VA at near and distance with their habitual correction
2. Refractive error measured with the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 Autorefractor
3. Cover Test at near (40 cm)
4. Near Point of Accommodation
5. Near Point of Convergence
6. Vergence Facility Test at near (40 cm)
7. Monocular and binocular Accommodation Facility Test at near (40 cm)
8. Negative and Positive Relative Accommodation Test (ARN and ARP)
9. Random Dot 2 Stereo acuity Test
10. CISS questionnaire
11. Fusional Vergence Amplitude using both subjective and objective methods

Exclusion Criteria

* having eye surgery
* having an eye pathology
* having a binocular or an accommodative disorder
* using orto-K lenses
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cristina Rovira Gay

Principal Investigator, Predoctoral student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cristina Rovira-Gay

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Cristina Rovira-Gay

Role: primary

610072514

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scheiman M, Mitchell GL, Cotter S, Cooper J, Kulp M, Rouse M, Borsting E, London R, Wensveen J; Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of treatments for convergence insufficiency in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;123(1):14-24. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.1.14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15642806 (View on PubMed)

Scheiman M, Talasan H, Alvarez TL. Objective Assessment of Disparity Vergence after Treatment of Symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency in Children. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Jan;96(1):3-16. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001320.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30570596 (View on PubMed)

Alvarez TL, Scheiman M, Santos EM, Morales C, Yaramothu C, D'Antonio-Bertagnolli JV, Biswal BB, Gohel S, Li X. The Convergence Insufficiency Neuro-mechanism in Adult Population Study (CINAPS) Randomized Clinical Trial: Design, Methods, and Clinical Data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;27(1):52-72. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2019.1679192. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31640452 (View on PubMed)

Scheiman M, Mitchell GL, Cotter S, Kulp MT, Cooper J, Rouse M, Borsting E, London R, Wensveen J. A randomized clinical trial of vision therapy/orthoptics versus pencil pushups for the treatment of convergence insufficiency in young adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;82(7):583-95. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000171331.36871.2f.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16044063 (View on PubMed)

Scheiman M, Chase C, Borsting E, Mitchell GL, Kulp MT, Cotter SA; CITT-RS Study Group. Effect of treatment of symptomatic convergence insufficiency on reading in children: a pilot study. Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jul;101(4):585-593. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12682. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29577409 (View on PubMed)

Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of treatments for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;126(10):1336-49. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.10.1336.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18852411 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Vergence VT Protocol

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Visual Attention and Eye Movements
NCT03298737 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Visual Motor Coordination
NCT00568243 TERMINATED