Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visual Functions of Adult Amblyopia: a Preliminary Study

NCT ID: NCT05393739

Last Updated: 2025-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-05

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Amblyopia, with a prevalence rates of 3% in adult population, is a common cause of vision impairment. It is characterized by impaired vision in one or both eyes because of disruption of normal visual stimuli and underdevelopment of the visual cortex, leads to lifelong visual deficits affecting both monocular and binocular visual function. Common causes of amblyopia include refraction error, anisometropia, strabismus and visual deprivation arising from ptosis or congenital cataract. Our previous studies had shed light on the relationship between abnormal early visual experience, and development of later amblyopia and possible neural developmental disorders. Functional recovery is difficult when neuroplasticity slows down at the end of the critical period. To date, there is no established effective treatment for adult amblyopia.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one of the non-invasive stimulations had been used widely as a research tool to understand the brain functions and an established treatment modality in neuropsychiatric diseases. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a newer form of rTMS protocol which have a major advantage over traditional rTMS in their reduced administration duration and allowing stimulation at significantly lower intensities to attain comparable effects. TBS had been demonstrated to able to improve functions in participants with visual disorders. However, studies of its use on adult amblyopia are scarce. Due to lack of efficient treatment at present, it is of scientific significance to conduct placebo-controlled experiments on this topic. Investigators will evaluate the effect of three regimens of TBS (intermittent, continuous and sham), after one session and accumulative sessions, on visual functions of amblyopia adults shortly after treatment and 2 weeks later (lasting effect), in order to evaluate its potential role in amblyopia and find out the best paradigm for amblyopia treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amblyopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intermittent theta burst

The total TBS time is about 1 to 3 minutes and the subjects have to look at at a visual stimulus on a computer monitor while receiving TBS and continue the visual training until 20 minutes after the treatment. In iTBS group, the subjects look at the visual stimulus with amblyopic eye while in cTBS group, subjects look at visual stimulus with non-amblyopic eye. The subjects will receive three times of stimulations in one week. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) procedure

Intervention Type DEVICE

The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.

Continuous theta burst

The total TBS time is about 1 to 3 minutes and the subjects have to look at at a visual stimulus on a computer monitor while receiving TBS and continue the visual training until 20 minutes after the treatment. In iTBS group, the subjects look at the visual stimulus with amblyopic eye while in cTBS group, subjects look at visual stimulus with non-amblyopic eye. The subjects will receive three times of stimulations in one week. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) procedure

Intervention Type DEVICE

The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.

Sham theta burst

The stimulus intensity in sham group is about half of that in iTBS/cTBS groups, and the subjects receive a placebo stimulation with the coil orientation tilted to 90°. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) procedure

Intervention Type DEVICE

The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) procedure

The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult amblyopia participants, aged 20-50 years old.
3. An amblyogenic factor and history of amblyopia treatment was recorded

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unstable vital sign
2. History of brain injury and/or head trauma
3. Neurological and psychiatric disease
4. Seizures or family history of seizure
5. Pregnancy
6. Uncontrolled migraine or the presence of metallic implants or shunt in the head or torso
7. Wide region of ischemic cicatrix, multiple sclerosis, taking tricycle antidepressants,
8. Analgesics or any drugs may decrease the threshold for inducing seizure
9. Experienced sleep disorders during the rTMS treatment
10. Severe alcoholism or taking seizure drugs
11. Severe heart diseases or uncontrollable migraine caused by high intracranial pressure
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tzu-Hsun Tsai

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei County, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tzu-Hsun Tsai, PhD

Role: CONTACT

886223123456 ext. 65906

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tzu-Hsun Tsai, PhD

Role: primary

886223123456 ext. 65906

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202106139DINC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.