Comparison of Edge Laminar Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Management After VATS
NCT ID: NCT07073495
Last Updated: 2026-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-15
2025-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
US-Guided SAPB Versus ESPB on Acute and Chronic Pain After VATS
NCT05160961
Comparison of Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
NCT05105282
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block
NCT07330479
Edge of Laminar Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT07201285
Comparison of Erector Spinae Block and Combined Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
NCT06073197
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
ELB effectively blocks both anterior and posterior branches of thoracic nerves, providing extensive dermatomal sensory loss. It is considered a safer alternative to TPVB due to a lower risk of damage to sensitive structures like the pleura or major vessels during needle placement. ELB has been shown to be effective in postoperative pain management and reducing opioid consumption in surgeries like VATS. SPSIPB, applied by injecting local anesthetic between the serratus posterior superior muscle and intercostal muscles, provides both anteroposterior and lateral thoracic analgesia, creating a broad sensory block area. Studies have reported that SPSIPB provides an effective sensory block between C3-T10 levels and significantly reduces postoperative pain scores.
Study Objectives:
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of ELB and SPSIPB in postoperative pain management in patients undergoing VATS. The study will focus on the following specific aims:
To evaluate the effects of ELB and SPSIPB on postoperative pain scores (Visual Analog Scale/Numeric Rating Scale - VAS/NRS).
To compare the potential of both techniques in reducing postoperative opioid consumption.
To examine the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). To assess secondary outcome measures such as the need for additional analgesics and patient satisfaction in the postoperative period.
This study aims to be one of the first prospective observational studies to directly compare the efficacy of ELB and SPSIPB. The results are expected to provide guidance for optimal postoperative pain management in VATS patients and contribute to a better understanding of the clinical role of these two techniques.
Study Design and Methodology:
This will be a prospective, observational, single-center study. Patient groups will be formed based on natural clinical practice, without randomization. No additional procedures, interventions, or treatment changes will be made to any patient within the scope of the study. All patients will be managed according to standard anesthesia protocols currently applied in the clinic, at the discretion of the responsible anesthesiologists. During the study period, patients undergoing VATS will receive the block protocol routinely preferred by the responsible anesthesiologists, and no intervention will be made by the researchers. This study will not implement a new protocol; rather, it involves prospectively recording data from an anesthesia pain management protocol that proceeds in its natural course.
Postoperative Follow-up:
Pain Assessment: Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.
Opioid Consumption: The amount of opioid consumed within the first 48 hours will be recorded (as morphine equivalents).
Complications: Complications such as hypotension, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting will be monitored.
Mobilization: The time until first mobilization (sitting at bedside/walking) will be recorded.
Patient Satisfaction: Patient satisfaction and pain control will be monitored and recorded for 48 hours (using a 5-point Likert scale).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ELB Group
Patients undergoing VATS who received Edge Laminar Block (ELB) for postoperative pain management. ELB involves the injection of local anesthetic at the edge of the thoracic lamina as a regional anesthesia technique. The efficacy and safety of ELB will be evaluated in this group.
No interventions assigned to this group
SPSIPB Group
Patients undergoing VATS who received Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) for postoperative pain management. SPSIPB involves the injection of local anesthetic into the intercostal plane beneath the serratus posterior superior muscle. The efficacy and safety of SPSIPB will be evaluated in this group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eda Cennet Caferoğlu
Dr. Eda Cennet Caferoğlu
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-06/84
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.